Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Bush wasn't unpopular, Olbermann wouldn't be permitted

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Stevendsmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 03:43 PM
Original message
If Bush wasn't unpopular, Olbermann wouldn't be permitted
This is MSNBC hedging their bets. They've got a bunch of RW pundits, but they let Keith hammer Bush as a kind of insurance policy. It's analagous to a corporation donating tons of money to Republicans, but some money to Democrats as well.

That said: Keith f*cking rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Right. But if BushCo hadn't screwed up as badly as they have, he
wouldn't be so unpopular.

I like Keith's chances in that match-up, both in the legal arena and the PR arena.

I'm angry that MSNBC just fired Eric Alterman ("What Liberal Media" indeed!) so I hope KO prevails and thrives for a long time.

He's a damned refreshing soul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevendsmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Agreed! Yes, the Alterman firing is a travesty. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOLADEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Absolutely.
MSNBC is trying to hedge.

What I don't get is why one of the networks doesn't just go to the opposite of Fox. 60% or more of Americans oppose the administration on almost every major policy point from the environment, to terror, to Iraq, to health, taxes, you name it.

There isn't a margin to be made in appealing to a completely unrepresented near super-majority of the world's wealthiest consumer market?

I don't get it. Greed usually wins doesn't it? I mean, what is a boy to believe in if he can't believe in the almighty power of greed? of a 60% marketshare monopoly, in essence?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allisonthegreat Donating Member (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. MSM-It's about time!
I hope they don't fire him...It was a hell of a commentary..I loved Eric aand wondered what happened to him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. They're afraid.
"What I don't get is why one of the networks doesn't just go to the opposite of Fox. 60% or more of Americans oppose the administration on almost every major policy point from the environment, to terror, to Iraq, to health, taxes, you name it."

The right organizes much more than the left. The right is more likely to watch slanted news en masse, and they're far more likely to attack anything that they don't like using boycotts and the like. The right is also pretty monolithic, and they move in lockstep, whereas the left has a lot of little sub-groups who would want to have special attention to their causes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Keith has been in this fight from the start.
He was the only one reporting 2004 stolen election in Ohio. He is a ray of hope in this stink-hole. (comment may be a bit strong but I have been pushed over the edge!) Peace, KIm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jedr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. it's all about selling soap,and it always has been;

remember that approx. 33% of the U.S. like G-dub, 33% are "ify", and 33% against. That makes selling your soap a tricky business. I think we need to realize this because the 33% pro are very vocal. Get your bumper stickers and yard signs going and don't be afraid to stand up to the bullies at the water cooler. That being said, K.O.'s commentary was eloquent to say the least and said what I was feeling. How have we gone so wrong in 5 yrs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. What did he say? I can not see the tape. It just will not work for me.
--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Got sound on MS-NBC. Glad he said it
--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. Huh? Keith Is Just Being Keith. Since He's One Of Their Best. They Let
him be Keith. I don't think the concept goes much deeper than that to be honest with ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. As I recall Keith brought a lot of baggage to this job.
The good kind.

He didn't want to do another "news" show where he wanted to cover Bin Laden, but was forced to talk about Lewinsky.

I suspect there's something interesting in his contract. Something that Phil Donahue didn't have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC