Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Associated Press: Lessons Learned From ABC's `9/11' Folly

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 05:06 PM
Original message
The Associated Press: Lessons Learned From ABC's `9/11' Folly
What does "The Path to 9/11" tell us instead?

— For one thing, it reminds us that aggrieved liberals can get just as riled at the media as conservatives. Never mind that ABC and its parent, the Walt Disney Co., are part of what the right wing slams as the liberal media elite. Disney was nonetheless accused of shelling out $40 million to craft a docudrama that would curry favor with the Bush administration, its airing shrewdly timed to the midterm election.

— The film's brutal reception also demonstrates how, when a protest hits its stride, nearly everybody loves to pile on. Rush Limbaugh and Hugh Hewitt heartily endorsed "The Path to 9/11," but their fellow conservative pundit (and former Reaganite) Bill Bennett weighed in against it. And even Harvey Keitel, the film's star, confessed on CNN to doubts about its accuracy back when he was shooting it.

Meanwhile, the "Path to 9/11" ambush should have taught ABC and the filmmakers these valuable lessons:

— First, get your story straight. When you deal with a subject as disturbing and painful as the 9/11 attacks, it's a good idea to not misrepresent it. And when your film shovels blame on powerful people, especially a former president, it's wise to remember that those bigwigs bite back. It's best to have the facts on your side.

— The other lesson: Get your story straight. When you're hyping a program, make sure, up front, to nail down what you're hyping it as.

Full-page magazine ads last week billed "The Path to 9/11" as "Based on The 9/11 Commission Report." Period. The message being peddled: This film would stay faithful to the definitive written account, with commission chairman Thomas Kean on board to certify its authenticity.

And yet by Sunday, ads were omitting any mention of the 9/11 Report. So did the opening credits of the film in the version that aired.

http://www.adelphia.net/news/read.php?id=13083671&ps=1005&srce=news_class&action=3&lang=en&_LT=HOME_TVNWC03L3_UNEWS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Our task: to preserve freedom of speech while protecting the
nation against lies.

We now take it for granted that we have to deal with lies all the time. How did this come about, and what is the way out of this quagmire?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC