Jack Cafferty just blasted Bush's attempt to pass a law

[Subdivisions]

that would protect him from the consequences of the laws he's broken.

Sorry, no link yet, but maybe C&L will have it later.

Here is the question:

Should Congress pass a law that would prevent members of the Bush administration from being prosecuted for war crimes?

You can send your answer here:

http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5t.html?65

[Rosco T.]

1. Wouldn't it almost immediately be declared unconstitutional..

.. being ex post facto and therefor in violation of Article I, Sections 9?

[movonne]

2. Well maybe if it was Clinton, but the the bush adm..

[Jacobin]

5. Since SCOTUS appointed him emperor

Probably not

[ourbluenation]

3. keep this kicked. pressure pressure pressure. I sent an email to Jack

and I encourage everyone to do so too.

[SoCalDem]

4. It's the "Wimpy" bill.. I'll gladly change a law next week,

for the law I'll break today :)

[SammyWinstonJack]

6. !

:spray: Isn't that the truth?

[RufusEarl]

7. This is amazing,

if he wants a law to keep him from being prosecuted he must know he has commented war crimes.
To me this is an admission of guilt, his attorney's must have advised him to get a law on the books. Simply amazing!!