Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How Many Admendments Has The Bush Regime Broken?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
true_notes Donating Member (740 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 11:28 PM
Original message
How Many Admendments Has The Bush Regime Broken?
Ok DU, I don't know how many of you will read this or even put any thought into it, but it would be interesting to compile a list of all the admendments chimp n' charge and his nutcases have broken. Below I posted the Bill of Rights. Hope you guys participate. I'll mass mail this if it is successful.

Thanks
T_N

The Conventions of a number of the States having, at the time of adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added, and as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government will best insure the beneficent ends of its institution;

Resolved, by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two-thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States; all or any of which articles, when ratified by three-fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the said Constitution, namely:


Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.



Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.


Amendment III
No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.


Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.



Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.


Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.


Amendment VII
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.


Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.


Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.


Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AllenVoivod Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Five out of ten...
Edited on Tue Sep-12-06 11:41 PM by AllenVoivod
The NSA wiretap thing violates #1 and #4. The treatment of "enemy combatants" violates #5, #6, and #8. How's that for a start?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Hi AllenVolvod!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and by extension 10.
Not a legal eagle, but this is my civics 101 take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I tend to agree, they have
broken all but the 2nd amendment.What amendment is covered from stealing 2 national elections?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Good call, but that's State election law I think. (States run elections).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Tell that to SCOTUS!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Oh yeah. Good answer. They sure ignored that provision.
(I try to remain forward thinking, but that still sticks in the craw, y'know? I've often wondered what the Florida Supreme Court felt privately about losing jurisdiction...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. F****CCCCKKKK!!!!
Even with Jeb in the Governor's Mansion this gov't ignors the rule of law
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. Ummmm....why did you post this twice? The older thread is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC