Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Salon: "PT911" not scriptwriter's first "crockudrama":

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 06:32 AM
Original message
Salon: "PT911" not scriptwriter's first "crockudrama":
Edited on Wed Sep-13-06 07:00 AM by JHB
According to Salon today, it turns out that The Path to 9/11 wasn't the first "crocudrama" penned by scriptwriter by Cyrus Nowrasteh: The executive producer and director hired him after reading his script for the 2001 Showtime "docudrama" The Day Reagan was Shot (directed by oliver Stone, no less).

For any wingnuts who want to claim PT911 was well-researched, Salon quotes some commentary on Nowrasteh's previous "well researched" effort. The commentator? Richard V. Allen, former Reagan National Security Advisor (not exactly a patron saint to us to the left of Attilla the Hun):

"How do I know it is fictional? Because I was there. Oh, and I had a tape recorder ...

"Situation Room meetings are rarely tape-recorded, but because we were dealing with a national emergency that afternoon, I placed my own small recorder in the center of the table. I captured the entire proceedings, about six hours. Written versions of these events have appeared since, some mostly accurate, others mostly inaccurate, but none has approached 'The Day Reagan Was Shot' for brazen distortion ...

"The film places generals in the Situation Room when they were not there; introduces conversations that never occurred; claims that a 'red alert from NORAD' was in progress (there is no such thing) and that a Soviet 'wolf pack' was off our coast with malign intent. (It wasn't: There were more Soviet subs than usual because it was the end-of-the-month changeover day, as we figured out within 20 minutes.) ...

"Messrs. Stone and Nowrasteh had completed their shoot by the time I wrote an account of the March 1981 events in the Atlantic Monthly, on the 20th anniversary. They then had a problem: They needed to validate their version and had not known about my tapes. I insisted on seeing the film before talking with Mr. Stone's people, and after I did, Mr. Nowrasteh had the temerity to say that the tapes 'corroborate our movie.' They do no such thing ...

"Maybe the whole thing was meant as a comedy. If not, it is simply a swindle."


http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2006/09/12/911/index.html
:toast: :rofl: :spray:

"Fiction"? "Swindle"? "Teremity" to claim "corroborate our movie"?
It's deja vu all over again!



For anyone who wants to pony up $4.95 for Allen's original WSJ article, here's the link:
http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/wsj/access/94908277.html?dids=94908277:94908277&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=Dec+14%2C+2001&author=By+Richard+V.+Allen&pub=Wall+Street+Journal&edition=Eastern+edition&startpage=W.21&type=91_1996&desc=Taste%3A+The+Day+the+Truth+Was+Shot+---+Oliver+Stone+tries+history+again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. I saw "The Day Reagan Was Shot," and it struck me odd how they portrayed
...Poppy Bush as this stoic, heroic figure in control while everyone else was freaking out.

This might be indicative who's ultimately paying Cyrus to write such shit:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. IMHO Poppy was to Reagon what Dick is to Junior
Both could not come out of the rain unless somebody told them too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamahaingttta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. No, that's not quite right...
The Reagans (particularly Nancy) HATED the Bushs, and Poppy was behind the attempt on Dutch's life in '81. Reagan's California crew tried to do everything they could to keep Poppy in the wilderness, but he was too connected.

Try this for a little light bedtime reading:

http://www.tarpley.net/bushb.htm#Table
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thanks for the link I will read later
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. If Cyrus keeps this up
he'll become even MORE persona non grata in Hollywood than he already is. Kinda hard to "take over the film business and install 'Christian Values'" if no one returns your calls, is willing to meet with you publicly and -- especially -- sees the pathetic tripe (no offense to tripe) you call a movie.

He's a footnote the Freepers will insist is a genius filmmaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. Uh...what's with that URL?
I have a wide-screen monitor, and I still had to scroll a foot to the right!

Anyway...good post. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. It's just very long...
...and I'm a little fuzzy on how to give it a short label.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC