The body armor commercial in still PHOTOS (and link to VIDEO)

[yurbud]

To see this move:
http://www.ifilms.tv/votevetsweb/

To vote it up on Youtube:
http://youtube.com/results?search_query=votevets.org&search=Search


When your Congressman or Senator runs a lame fucking ad, burn this to CD, send it to them, and tell them to fire their campaign manager.

[Skidmore]

1. We saw that ad last night on teevee!!!

My husband wanted to know who grew a spine! LOL!!!

[NewJeffCT]

2. great ad - they are also running anti-Lieberman ads

The group is votevets.org

[yurbud]

5. they should bury his sorry vichy ass.

[Cha]

9. I love it. I'd like

to know what they are saying about der lieman.

[NewJeffCT]

11. ask & ye shall receive

Here is a link to a PDF of their print ad:

http://www.votevets.org/storage/votevets/documents/printad9-7.pdf

They also had a radio ad running here in the Hartford area.

To summarize, They said they were back from Iraq and had some tough questions (What is our military mission in Iraq? Where are those WMD?, etc) and, then wondered why Joe Lieberman didn't ask any of them.

[Cha]

16. Thanks Jeff! ol' lieman being held

accountable by the very Soldiers he sent off to die or not. :nuke:

[yurbud]

3. independent group, not the Dems

The Dems commercials would be more like "I firmly believe whatever does not offend big business or the GOP."

[Broken_Hero]

21. yeah, same here....

I was surprised by the ad as well...:)

[trotsky]

4. Does anyone know if there was an equivalent vote in the House on this?

Would be useful to run against slimeball Mark "Screech" Kennedy who is now running for Senate here in Minnesota.

[NewJeffCT]

6. Good question - I'd like to know, too

To see if it is something that can be run against Rob Simmons, Chris Shays or Nancy Johnson here in CT...

[wakeme2008]

7. You would have to check how they voted

it is listed in one of the last frames.

[NewJeffCT]

12. It has the Senate resolution listed

But, I did not see a corresponding one for the House.

[Cha]

8. Yowzer! Thanks, yurbud!

Finally, get some barenaked fact out there about the hypocricy of the fu*king neoCons.

[yurbud]

13. Now they need one to ask who profited from the war...

this our debt for the war.

this the number of soldiers who have died.

this is the number of Iraqis who have died.

this is the profits of the oil companies.

this is the stock price of Halliburton.

Any questions?

[Cha]

15. Prescisely! The Blood and

Treasure we lost based on fabricated evidence and bush Lies and the corporate media's "MARCH TO WAR" :nuke:

[Libby2]

10. Very Powerful!

Thanks for posting.

[Beausoir]

14. Saw it last night. It's a nuke.

Now we're talking. Time to point of the truth.

[Ioo]

17. I agree, but not seen it on TV in DC area.

[Ioo]

18. *** REMEMBER - They are looking for $$$ to air it - HELP THEM!!****

https://secure.democracyinaction.com/dia/organizations/iavapac/shop/custom.jsp?donate_page_KEY=1191&t=GoodNewOne.dwt

[GregW]

19. One thing I find confusing...

We faced the AK-47 in Vietnam - it was 'today's' weapon back in the 60's.

Am I to infer from the ad that the Vietnam-era "flak jackets" that were issued to our troops in Iraq were ineffective in Vietnam, and that modern armor provides effective protection to the torso and head?

The ad sort of sounds like weapons have evolved and armor hasn't - where in reality it's the same weapons and now better armor.

[yurbud]

20. the old ones could deflect shrapnel and smaller arms fire not a straight

on shot from a larger caliber like an AK-47.

the gun didn't change, but defenses got better.