Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

9th Circuit: Laptops May Be Subject to Customs Inspections

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 01:33 PM
Original message
9th Circuit: Laptops May Be Subject to Customs Inspections
BORDER INSECURITY
9th Circuit: Laptops May Be Subject to Customs Inspections After Overseas Trips

BY STEVE SEIDENBERG

With a conviction for online child exploitation, Stuart Romm is hardly a sympathetic advocate for computer privacy.

Still, what happened to Romm when he crossed the border into the United States worries some legal experts. The laptop computer that he carried with him was intensively searched by customs officials. On July 24, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the search was legal.

In U.S. v. Romm, No. 04-10648, the San Francisco-based 9th Circuit ruled that customs officials can seize and search the contents of anyone’s laptop computer, even in the absence of a search warrant or probable cause.

Some attorneys say the ruling goes too far, invading the privacy of anyone who crosses into the United States. And the ruling may pose special problems for attorneys who need to keep client information confidential when they go on business trips overseas.

http://www.abanet.org/journal/ereport/s15border.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
formernaderite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. THIS from the 9th circuit???
very strange, indeed....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. The 9th Circuit ruled on this??
That's wierd from them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wtf???
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Liberal Courts for you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geoff R. Casavant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Just the logical extension of an established principle.
Border searches don't require warrants or probable cause because until you cross the border you're not in the United States from a legal perspective and so the 4th Amendment doesn't apply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC