Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Keith Olbermann's on... ought to be an interesting show.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:02 PM
Original message
Keith Olbermann's on... ought to be an interesting show.
He's replaying his "Politics of 9/11: A Special Comment" commentary, for those who haven't seen it online yet.

And I can't wait to watch his coverage of Bush's presser today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. "its unacceptable to think"
I like how he keeps repeating that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. love that line
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Thoughtcrime!!!!!!!
Edited on Fri Sep-15-06 07:42 PM by doublethink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. now he's showing the David Gregory clip
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Tony Snow was having a good laugh in the background, wasn't he?
It's unacceptable to think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. What a snit. Get the net.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. watching this, I feel so embarrassed for Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. He's reprehensible.
Bully in a pulpit. Unfuckingbelievable.

Keith's really going after that "unacceptable to think" line. Excellent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
32. His actions and stupid words
have made me come to hate him. I dont say that lightly, but it has come to that. I hate his policies and I hate his bullying. In short, I hate him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. I can't believe anyone thinks he is not a jerk
(Bush not Gregory)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. Yes! It's about making Abu Graib and Gitmo legal! Say it, Keith!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Man I have been under a rock
I had no idea dipshit went off like this today about article III

loony
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
53. I think he's growing more and more shrill and aggitated because
SOMEBODY, maybe James Baker or somebody else, has mentioned to him that he may very likely be branded a war criminal for pursuing this. And I think it's making him slightly jumpy when he's not getting his nice rubberstamp again - especially on something as crucial as keeping him out of a war crimes tribunal. As is, I'm willing to bet that whenever he leaves office (sooner, hopefully, than later) there will be countries he cannot dare ever fly to again, for fear of being placed under arrest when he hits the ground. I think Kissinger suffers the same fate - really can't leave this country for fear of being arrested overseas in countries that have declared him a war criminal. I think the same fate awaits bush. It'll be moot - he doesn't like to travel. But watch what happens, and how many international people will have to come to him in later years because he won't be able to go to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. They obviously only gave him the one "hypothetical" line and
Edited on Fri Sep-15-06 07:13 PM by jazzjunkysue
"program not going forward." and the rest he improvised.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. even Howard Fineman is shocked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. What an effing, pompous ass Bush was in that!!!!!!
This guy is getting so out of control, it's unbelievable. He has GOT to be stopped!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. His handlers are giving him just enough rope: They know the end is near,.
Let him swing. Stick a fork in him. I'm so outta here.

Remember the last time the whitehouse morale dropped like this? After mission accomplished?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. So, is Keith right? Bush is saying he's going to stop fighting terror...
... by shutting down the CIA interrogators, if the Senate doesn't do as he wishes? That he's going to take his ball and go home, as Keith puts it?

That's sure what his response to Gregory sounded like to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I thought the same thing.
I'm just stunned by that whole exchange between Bush and David Gregory. Stunned at what Bush was saying. I think Gregory was too, given the look on his face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
15. Bush* is the biggest smart ass I've ever seen.
Edited on Fri Sep-15-06 07:13 PM by spanone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
18. Fineman on Bush: He's not talking to the people, he's talking to history..
... and to himself. He's making the point that if his presidency goes down, it's going down the way he wants it to."

(speaking about Bush's "anger" in the press conference, in response to Keith's question, "is Bush helping himself by appearing so angry?")

That was quite a shocking admission from Fineman; I think he's spot on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Yeah, but Finemen's round heels kicked in as this media whore
Edited on Fri Sep-15-06 07:16 PM by ShortnFiery
then instantly flopped on his back to DECLARE, "I think they will reach a compromise."

No compromise! We, The United States of America, don't TORTURE.

Can't Keith get anyone better than Fineman? :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. Jonathan Turley coming up....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
20. Jonathan Turley up next.
This should be good -- Turley will analyze the legal angle; I'm sure he'll get all over Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Turley is really good.
I can't wait to hear his take on this, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #20
44. We need more spokespeople like him- hearing him really hits home
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
21. The more I think about that exchange between Bush and Gregory,
the angrier I get, NOT at David Gregory, of course, but at Bush. Someone stop me before I start throwing things. I have NEVER seen anything like this from a POTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Bush doesn't like Gregory.
This has happened before--but not quite to the extent it did today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Bush doesn't like anyone who questions him, but yes he particularly
doesn't like Gregory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. I'd guess Gregory isn't real crazy about Bush, either.
Isn't Gregory the reporter who Bush mocked some years ago because he had the gall to speak French to a French politician, in front of Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #28
37. YES. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. Remember the press conferences with Scotty during Katrina?
Gregory pissed Bush off years earlier when he asked Chirac a question in French, but I'll bet their hatred of him reached new levels when he absolutely skewered Scotty during Hurricane Katrina.

And remember... Gregory, under heat for his "behavior" during that week, ultimately apologized to Scotty.

When Bush called on Gregory today, I was surprised... and then I knew he was in for something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Gregory took heat from Snow recently also--
only because he wanted a legitimate answer to a legitimate question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
27. this is gonna be good on constitutional law - with picture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
29. Turley is breaking this down well
"this administration senses something big coming down".

Man, I hope C&L gets this on tapel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. So do I. I'd like to watch this several times, so I can get everything
Turley is saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Absolutely. Bush* is covering his rear. New Gitmo detainees/Red Cross
Edited on Fri Sep-15-06 07:22 PM by spanone
The Red Cross will interview these new Gitmo detainees and they will find out that we have been waterboarding. Illegal, against the law. War crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. I swear, if Congress passes ANYTHING to help Bush get off
the hook on this shit, we truly have turned into that which we despise. Never again can we hold ourselves as a moral authority in the world. Never again can we go after another country for torturing our men and women in the military. The domino effect of this, across the world, would be unspeakably disastrous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. Road to The Hague.
Edited on Fri Sep-15-06 07:53 PM by Xap
Even if * gets his private little self-pardon passed by his private little rubber-stamp Congress, why would the rest of the 194 countries that signed the Geneva Conventions pay any attention to his private little "law"?

Will he go into hiding or to the Hague?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. Backside covering.
Turley thinks the 14 Gitmo prisoners will disclose all kinds of mistreatment, in theory subjecting US officials to prosecution. They are more worried about that than the need to get information out of detainees.

Evil fucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
30. Here it is: The truth. "There's alot of trouble coming down this mountain.
Edited on Fri Sep-15-06 07:20 PM by jazzjunkysue
Like, violations of genieva conventions and also NSA violations. (Wire taping.)

This is about impeachment and imprisonment.

Keith is the first to say it, as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #30
39. Further the Democrats should take the following truism and run with it ...
Edited on Fri Sep-15-06 07:26 PM by ShortnFiery
Turley mentioned that TODAY is "Constitution Day" ... the day we celebrate The Rule of Law.

Bush used Constitution Day to argue in favor of Secret Prisons and Torture for ALL he should deem as *terrorists*!

The Democratic Candidates should use this FACT often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Good idea.
When Turley said that, I got even angrier about what Bush said. I hope the Dems DO use it. I know I will be!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Great reminder from Turley n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #39
56. Actually, Sept. 18th is the official celebration day this year
Sept. 17th 1787 was when the constitution was finalized by the delegates and signed it in Philadelphia. The individual states ratified it later - Delaware if you recall was the first state.

But Turley was trying to definitely point out the irony of the active push that this administration was doing that is an assault on the Constitution and right around the same time we are supposed to be celebrating the Constitution.

The debate and vote on the floor of the Senate will be most likely on Monday...the actual Constitution Day....nice, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. Thanks for the Clarification ...
Edited on Sat Sep-16-06 12:28 PM by ShortnFiery
I often find that Liberals and Progressives want the CORRECT information on issues. Therefore, IMO we're more willing to adjust when corrected and/or clarified.

Yes, I wouldn't want to be corrected by a Right Winger ... as if he/she truly knows the history of Our Beloved Constitution. However, one never knows?

Thanks again for keeping us smart. :-) :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. Your welcome!
I agree that more often than not that Liberals/Progressives want facts and the correct info on issues and that many of the conservatives I know are satisfied with half truths on issues. On the otherhand, a Right Winger may be satisfied justifying what they do based on a half truth, but just love to correct a liberal if they have made a mistake. Yes, it is truly ironic that the folks on the conservative side can often seem to think they and they alone are somehow the "guardians of the true meaning behind the Constitution".

I'm glad you didn't take my post as being anything other than what it was - passing on info. I went to the University of Pennsylvania, founded by Benjamin Franklin and I have always and passionately followed Franklin's life and the original signers of the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution. Going to school in Phillie and also having grown up in Washington DC provided me with great resources.

PS: Here's another "irony": Constitution Day was only 2 years ago signed into law by none other than George W. (it used to be Citizenship Day). But I find that there are so many arrogant things that he and his administration like to do on the very days that are celebrating the opposite of what he announces! Take for example on MLK's B'day a few years back that he announces his administration is going to be arguing against affirmative action in the Univ. of Michigan admissions case in front of the Supreme Court. Or on the anniversary of Roe v. Wade that they announce something that clearly goes against women's reproductive rights. Anyway, the announcement that he wants both torture and rendition allowed as well as his arguments about wiretapping all around "Constitution Day and Week" is ironic, but I often think and believe in their case its actually deliberate.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
42. Really not that interesting right now.
He's covering skinny models. Great story -- NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. He will replay his "Hole in the Ground" commentary
after the commercial break.

Says will include new developments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. I'm very curious as to what the new development are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. George Pataki vetoed legislation
that would allow free admittance to the 9/11 Memorial
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
47. 800,000 emails and letters about his commentary
that has to be a huge record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. I'm watching, but I missed the story about the 800,000 emails.
Did he say they asked thathe rerun that comentary? I'm assuming they must have, since that's what he's doing tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
49. Great ..... gotta pay to get into the 911 memorial .....
if and whenever it gets built.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
51. Keith's comments after the replay:
"And remember, since then, this President has now told us that it is unacceptable to think."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. No doubt that statement
Is based on bunnypant's personal experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
52. Ooooo, yet another SMACK upside your head, Mr. President.
Edited on Fri Sep-15-06 08:01 PM by napi21
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
55. Watched is just now!
He is off his nut, far more than usual. He needs a straight jacket and a visit from Nurse Ratched.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
57. video up on You Tube
rate it up

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ag3QsL2hbXI

Top rated video this date/hour
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #57
58. cool. I tried to watch last evening but kept getting interrupted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC