Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rethugs chose the wrong war, and then lost it!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
rndmprsn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 10:35 AM
Original message
Rethugs chose the wrong war, and then lost it!
"Republicans chose their own political security rather than our national security and followed george bush into the disaster that is iraq...AND THEN THEY LOST THE WAR!"

bill maher said this on hardball the other day, ive been repeating this over and over to some of my "republic party" friends and its starting to sink in...just this morning i heard one of them use this very same talking point to another rethug.

oh yeah i now refer to them as the "republic party" in protest to the whole democrat party thing...childish i know but we must stoop to their level to make them understand...ugh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mazzarro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bravo on the use of 'republic party'
I think a payback is quite appropriate at this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Love it. I prefer "Repub Party" myself. You know-
Edited on Sat Sep-16-06 11:10 AM by Marr
they use "Democrat Party" because it removes all semblance to the word "democracy", and adds a little "rat" sound.

"Repub" removes the similarity to "Republic" and sounds a little like "repugnant", so I figure it works about the same.

Tomato, tomaaaato.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rndmprsn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. i like the sound of that one too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No DUplicitous DUpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm sure the R's can find someone to say it is not, quite, lost yet..
Give us your kids, and maybe, we can win. NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Republic Party....
“…chose their own political security rather than our national security and followed george bu$h into the wrong war (Iraq) - and then they lost that war”...

I’ll add that that while the Republic Party has been busily fighting the wrong war for power, profit and political gain, the REAL war (on terrorism) has become more deadly than ever. The debacle in Iraq has naught but created more Anti-American sentiment — and more terrorists — hellbent on destroying the US. It has exacerbated the problem.

During the Clinton years, The Republic Party’s #1 concern was getting BILL CLINTON, not getting the terrorists. They spent millions of taxpayer dollars investigating Clinton’s sex life, rather than spending it on investigating terrorists and terrorist plots. The Republic Party’s #2 priority during the Clinton years was gaining and protecting corporate profit and their own political butts.

What has changed since bu$h was appointed is that their #2 priority is now #1 and terrorism isn’t even on the list.

The first things George bu$h did after he was appointed was shove through tax cuts for the rich, begin planning how to invade and occupy Iraq to get at the oil, toss all the programs and legislation Bill Clinton had in place to monitor and stop terrorism on a daily and weekly basis, close the Office of Women’s Initiatives, scrap the US Commission on National Security 21st Century’s (aka, the Hart-Rudman Commission) recommendations on terrorism, and go on vacation.

Since 9-11, the Republic Party wants you to let Osama binLaden decide who you should vote for. He’s their favorite boogeyman, waved in front of the faces of Americans, to get them to vote Republic(an). In light of the Republic Party’s agenda and record since then, it is unimaginable why anyone would - unless they’re simply not aware, and many sheeple in our nation are not. They are content to rely on whatever crap the lamestream media shovels down their throats, to be regurgitated later amongst themselves in soundbites and chain letters and out-of-context propaganda. They are content to let the spectre of Osama binLaden, still remarkably on the loose, decide who they should vote for. And this HAS to be the absolute epitome of ignorance and irony.

I don’t believe people who support the Republic Party are stupid. I do think they are ignorant. And, I think they choose to be oblivious to, or misinformed or misled about so many things. And, when people - thousands of them - die or are placed in greater danger of dying (or being terrorized, maimed or tortured) because other people choose to be ignornant and support despotic regimes for whatever reason, then I think that’s a big problem, not to mention outright immoral. To put this in proper perspective, it’s immoral on a much larger scale than a blow job from a big-haired intern who isn’t your wife.

But, proper perspective and priorities seem to be something the Republic Party and their supporters seem to constantly have problems dealing with. And because of that, we all pay. Some of us more dearly than others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good interview, and tweety couldn't argue with Bill.
So strange when tweety changes to his other personality and starts believeing in the rapture and intelligent design.

Let's call one Tweety-Dumb and the other Tweety-Dee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC