Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton plots his comeback - The Observer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
rndmprsn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 08:34 PM
Original message
Clinton plots his comeback - The Observer
Edited on Sat Sep-16-06 08:43 PM by rndmprsn
bill clinton secretary general of the UN...i like the sound of that!

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world/story/0,,1874278,00.html

It was the week he came out fighting. Bill Clinton's extraordinary assault on the makers of a dramatised 9/11 documentary which portrayed his administration as failing to prevent the terror attacks, was the most public example of a three-pronged effort - to protect his own presidential legacy, to relaunch himself as a world statesman and to make himself a viable First Gentleman should his wife Hillary achieve her own ambitions on the White House.

The publicity onslaught was launched by Clinton following the screening of the drama-documentary The Path to 9/11, which suggested that he failed to prevent the 11 September terrorist attacks because he was distracted by the Monica Lewinsky affair. The programme's timing could not have been worse for Clinton, coming just as he is trying to rebuild his reputation as a world statesman and while his wife is trying to gather support as the next Democratic presidential candidate ...



...Bob Muholland, a Democrat party activist and an old friend of Clinton's, agreed: 'It needed to be rebutted. You have to, otherwise people might start believing that rubbish. Bill Clinton has to speak out every day on this issue. For average people it is obvious that Bush is responsible for the failures leading up to 9/11.'

As soon as he gets the ABC controversy stamped on, Clinton will be straight back on the comeback trail to power, his supporters insist. 'Clinton does not need a Karl Rove. He is the best political analyst in the country.' said Mulholland. And those supporters are as eager as Clinton to reshape his legacy. 'Most Americans and most Brits would agree that looking at the world situation right now, they would prefer to have Bill Clinton as president again - or Bill Clinton running the United Nations,' he added.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bill for all his flaws ,was a superb manager of this country. A genius
I believe for the sake of bipartisanship and being a good partner to his wife have allowed him to be shanghaied by poppy 1163 and george Washington's aunt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just heard him speak at a dinner for Amy Klobuchar.
It was fabulous - and I love the message he's getting out there - that Democrats THINK, while Repukes ATTACK. Democrats have a philsophy and study the evidence to make decisions, while pukes have an ideology and discard evidence because they think they already know all the answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Those in the Blame Clinton crowd blame him for everything.
Other reasonable people will know what a crock this is.

I didn't at all get a feeling that Clinton was furious or angry or upset. On tv he simply smiled and said, "I think we owe the families of the victims the truth." This led me to believe that there will be legal action taken, and ABC will rue the day...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bush Clinton Bush Clinton...
how very Roman!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. In the Federalist era, two names made Washington cringe:
Cromwell and Caesar. Call him either one and you were tempting the man's volcanic wrath. I used to think it was really ironic that Australia's conservative party was named the Liberal Party. But that's only slightly ironic compared to Bush's faction being named Republicans. One contributing reason I don't want Senator Clinton nominated is the insult it would be to our 230 years of steady republicanism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MODemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Goodness, Bill Clinton is surely good on my eyes
He's a master at whatever he chooses to do. I'll always admire him no matter what. Thank you so much, Mister President. :thumbsup: :loveya: Thanks for the memories of peace and prosperity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigluckyfeet Donating Member (559 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I wonder if the Clinton's
have made a deal with the bush's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. that is exactly what i wondered too,
especially after the clintons themselves once said that the bushes had asked them not to run in 1992, that if they did not run in 1992, the bushes (meaning ole POPPY) promised to give them a free run. they said they wondered at the time what that meant. (they didn't have to wait long to find out, and neither did we) and now after all that, old man bush and clinton are friends?! and now, he is planning a come back, a UN comeback? something gives somewhere. the bushes tend to taint anything they touch--and whether clinton is free from bush taint or not, he is bush tainted in the eyes of very many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MODemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Sometimes I wonder why Clintons remain so close to Bush
It infuriates my husband for Clinton and Bush Sr. to be seen together so much; and it doesn't make me too happy either. As low as Bush is in the polls and all the trouble he's into, it doesn't make sense for them to be cozying up to him. I sure hope they haven't made a deal with the Bushes. :spank: :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Of course Clinton would never ACTUALLY get elected to UN chief
He's known as a hard nosed proponent of American interests and was a bit of a hawk on Iraqi sanctions. We forget that now, because the Iraq issue ended up being handled by people who were batshit insane. But Clinton choked Iraq's recovery and medical supplies (for fear they'd be turned into chemical weapons) and hit Iraq with missiles on at least two occasions. That's about as hard assed militant as you can get with Iraq without being a fucking re-tard.

The Russians and Chinese would nuke his nomination as Secretary General in a second. And they'd be doing him a favor since (1) his election would end Senator Clinton's chances (which I assume he supports) to become president and (2) it would be a pretty big demotion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh, one other problem. This new evidence tying Clinton to 9/11
I saw it on ABC...

It's got to be true! (think he's flying that thing with the Clenis?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. !!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think UN rules preclude a citizen of a permanent Security Council
member from being Secretary General.

That aside, I'd **love** to have him as SC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. you don't know what you got till it's gone...
but.. you can't go home again. I think it'll take more than Bill to right this ship..but he would probably at least steer us away from the icebergs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadManInc Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. I t would be a waste of his talent, but I would like to see him in
charge of the FCC. It would be funny to see Fox and the like kissing his ass!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COSPRINGS Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. People forget how popular he was..
I wish he would run for Senate himself. We need to keep him in the national spotlight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Warren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. People forget how popular he was
Still is....all around the world!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Warren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. SecGen UN.....OK very good
I'd love to see him on the new Dem Supreme Court
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
18. President Clinton is a great President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC