Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If you refuse to use a vote stealing machine, do you lose your vote?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 07:55 AM
Original message
If you refuse to use a vote stealing machine, do you lose your vote?
I assume if a person said he refused to use a diebold machine to vote with, he'd forfiet his vote. Or maybe a person could try an absentee ballot, but those are stolen and lost too by the corrupt. And then I suppose a person could demand a paper ballot with receipt.

Shouldn't a person have a choice? Or is it mandatory to use the diebold cheating machines? If we all know going into the booths that the votes are stacked, stolen and thrown out, what is the motivation for voting at all?

If close races can be stolen by machinery and trickery, are we doomed to vote impotently forever?

Can a landslide also be corrupted in this way? How the hell do we counteract the advent of the cheating machines?

We could very possibly lose November to republican machinery AGAIN but most folks don't seem to notice or care.

I want to see a revolt against the machines, or a revolt against something, anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Revolt against the machines.
Nice framing!

Our county has both - paper ballots that will be scanned & electronic voting machines. The election judges told me that90% of the people choose paper ballots. Oh really? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Scanned paper ballots are no better than DRE
The tabulators the scanned votes are read into have proprietary software that can do anything with the vote once it's in there. You'll never know if your vote was counted properly.

We need paper ballots that are hand-counted and count watchers overseeing the process. Nothing less than full transparency at every level of the process is acceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. A M E N , magellan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. "Speed should never trump accuracy when counting our votes."
(As quoted from your post on the other thread.)

And amen to that, seafan! We need to decide as a nation that knowing election results the same night isn't as important as safeguarding our democracy.

I point out the dangers of scanned absentee ballots every time someone suggests it as a safe way to vote. It's troubling to me that even here on DU, where we have access to so much information, many are still uninformed on the full extent of the threat posed by all electronic voting.

For example, as your post illustrates, why would the state of FL make it illegal to perform a hand recount of machine-read ballots? This legislation has stunk to high heaven since it was introduced. It casts even more suspicion on what's going on in the tabulators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. we can have both!
check out this site:

http://www.openvotingconsortium.org/

There has been a lot of good work done in California..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Open source software, what a novel idea!
You realize of course it'll take some doing to get this accepted nationwide...because no one can make any money off it!!

Thanks for the link, annabanana, it's good to see the open source community working on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. In NYS you can vote by affidavit or absentee ballot
they get counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. I had to get an absentee ballot in 2004
they had moved our polling place to a church and I refused to vote in a church. Luckily they accepted with no problem and have now moved our polling place to the city hall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. it is not too hard to vote that way..
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. Un bueno idea...
You ought to be able to demand a paper ballot. Why these election officials seem to hate accountability is perplexing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. yes
it is perplexing. The people charged with ensuring that our votes get counted apparently have no interest in accountability. Hmmmmmmm.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. We have advanced voting here
so you can vote with a paper ballot. Or you can wait till election day and use a machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecoalex Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Oregon's mail in voting scheme has worked well for many years.
My County Supervisor is against absentee , or mail in voting. He says you don't know all the information until voting day.I don't agree. Most people know the * enabling repugs must go. Some of the Dem enablers too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. I vote early by absentee & I make a copy for proof.
Don't know how I'd ever back it up in a court, but I do have a scanned and signed copy as my receipt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
13. if you vote on a rigged machine, why vote at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. superglue can weld in a vote
Then the rigged machine will only count 1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. --------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
18. Vote absentee
I'm going to be out in the burbs on election day working for a candidate. So I will have a paper vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC