Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let's "clarify" one lie that's making the rounds on morning talk shows...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 09:56 AM
Original message
Let's "clarify" one lie that's making the rounds on morning talk shows...
The CIA and the US military personnel are trained on the meaning of the Geneva Convention rules and the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice). When the President comes out into the Rose Garden and says that these young men need to know they are not "breaking the laws", he needs to be called on it. It's not that the CIA and the military do not know the rules of the Geneva Convention, it is that they were given orders by their superiors that these enemy combatants, these "terrorists", were not to be considered the same as enemies in the past. They were following orders from the top. That is the point that needs to be "clarified".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks. I was getting dizzy listening to Hadley on This Week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. he being the one who needs to learn a few things.
the professional know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. This tells me one thing. WE are already torturing people.
Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danascot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. ... including the imprisonment, torture and rape of children
This is being done in your name, America.

"...coalition forces are holding more than 100 children in jails such as Abu Ghraib. Witnesses claim that the detainees – some as young as 10 – are also being subjected to rape and torture."

http://www.sundayherald.com/43796


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Another thing that is lost in all of this ...
is that the press is letting the White House completely skirt the issue of torture in the hands of our partners. All the talk is about what an American EMPLOYEE would do. The whole point of the secret prisons was to get the prisoners into the hands of people who aren't bound by any of this. Why is nobody talking about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. And another point that needs to be "clarified"...
The laws have already been broken...intentionally. They cannot whitewash criminal acts by passing retroactive laws that contradict the rules agreed to by all the nations that signed onto the Geneva Convention rules. The laws have already been broken. Crimes have already been committed. When the President announced that 14 prisoners had been moved from "secret prisons" to Guantanamo Bay, he admitted to breaking the laws. He cannot now plead ignorance of the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. Thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emanymton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
8. 'Law Of Land Warfare' - Clear And Understandable ...
Another GOP Talking Point Smoke Screen!

USA military people are trained to follow Law Of Land Warfare (LLW). It is the law and military people understand the law must be followed. This is one of the backbones of USA military leadership and training!

Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) people are _NOT_ military personnel. LLW does not apply to them. Do not allow the GOP to use this as a smoke screen. This is another sorry sad example of the administration trying to govern under the policy, “Here is the law, how do we get around it.”

CIA are not covered as military persons under Geneva Convention.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. I know I was and everyone in my unit was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muesa Donating Member (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
10. My recollection
Is that we had about 40 hours of classes in the Geneva Conventions, IHL, and the UCMJ - which is more then Bush seems to have had. (I was in OCS right after the Gideon and Miranda cases were decided and that was part of the program).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladym55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. Well, it appears you were paying attention
Our pretzeldent was probably making spitballs, doodling, or drooling during his training. His daddy had his back, so the rules for the rest of us have never applied. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. Actually, Junior never went to OCS
He got a rare direct appointment after basic training, bypassing OCS. This clearly shows that the rules for the rest of us have never applied to him, thanks to daddy - just as you say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
11. So far
he has redefined war, redefined "enemy", redefined torture, and sadly, our Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emmadoggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. Yeah,
and everyone had a fit when Clinton said, "it depends on what your definition of "is" is." Bush just makes up his own definitions for pretty much
everything. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbrother05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. ding ding ding ding ding
Edited on Sun Sep-17-06 10:33 AM by bigbrother05
For more than 60 years, the military has been trained to observe the rules/laws. What the CIA has done is less clear, but we all (those that remember Nam) have seen glimpses of the techniques that have crossed the line, with the treatment of VC captives up to the latest news from Iraq, Cuba, and "secret" overseas prisons.

Alberto Gonzales tipped their hand with his "quaint" comments and this misAdministration has unleashed the basest instincts of frightened/pissed off interrogators to do whatever they think might get one extra bit of info. The only thing they are trying to do now is to get the Congress to give them retroactive cover for their criminal activities. As the OP stated, the interrogators knew the law and when they crossed the line. It is the higher ups that are at the greatest risk, they don't care about anyone but themselves.

Send them to the Hague!!!

Edited to add: Gave it #5, on to the greatest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. can';t send them to the hague cuz we decided the US wouldn't
participate in the world court (no doubt because we were already doing this illegal stuff)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yowzayowzayowza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
13. Also, how long until...
we fail to thwart an attack due to wasted resources from a torture induced goose chase?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Already Happened
Edited on Sun Sep-17-06 11:47 AM by The Deacon
Some DUers here will remember the specifics (I'm thinking it was the Incredible Vanishing New York Subways Plot) but an "enemy non-combatant" was "rendered" to Egypt was he made up a plot simply to stop the "alternative interrogation techniques" employed by the Egyptian secret police. It seems I remember several "terror plots" which were foiled by Dear Leader without any explaination of where the information came from - or any subsequent arrests of people involved in these Nefarious Deeds. Can any other DUers fill in the blanks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yowzayowzayowza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. A good question for * from the press:
How many CIA & FBI agents are you going to propose adding to chase down all the bad intelligence generated by this new torture regimen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
16. You are so right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
17. Bottom Line: Can we trust what the president says?
He has assured us of so many things that turn out not to be true. How do they REALLY know they are not "breaking the laws"....pretty sad state of affairs when you can't trust your own president!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
18. Correct.
K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. bingo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
20. K&R!!! Tony Snow Says "It's Never Come Up..."
WTF? The Geneva Conventions have "never come up?" What the hell are they talking about and why don't people call them on this bullshit!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
21. Isn't amazing how we were all clear about the Geneva Convention
and accepted it until Bush turned up?

You know what's going to happen if Bush has his way? Soldiers like Shoshona Johnson and Private Lynch are never going to make it back alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. And if he get's kidnapped, neither is he. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost-in-FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
25. First week of Basic training
Edited on Sun Sep-17-06 09:06 PM by Lost-in-FL
That is what is taught, UCMJ and Geneva Convention.

Also, "Don't ask don't tell" and "Sexual Harassment".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dem2theMax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
28. Too bad we can't plaster this all over the country -
"Do you really want your DAUGHTERS fighting a war WITHOUT the Geneva Convention rules protecting them?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC