Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

W keeps saying he would do whatever is required to "keep us safe"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 11:55 AM
Original message
W keeps saying he would do whatever is required to "keep us safe"
spying on citizens... ok if it keeps us safe.

torture - and reclassifying terms used for prisoners to allow torture... that could be used against captured US GIs... ok if it keeps us safe.

starting elective wars based on fraudulent evidence... ok if it keeps us safe.

But there is ONE thing that W thinks is off-bounds... lifting his tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans (or the wealthy oil companies or any other mega corporations)... that is NOT ok, even if it the $ was used to shore up US security to keep us safe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. IF it keeps us safe...
Edited on Sun Sep-17-06 12:12 PM by Amonester
Warrants would help keep us safe, but a lack of legal warrants R crimes: since when are crimes keeping anyone safe?

Torture (another crime) never produced any reliable information, especially when being committed against individuals who never did anything wrong (yes, that happens too, and when it does, who's to defend these innocent victims?).

Starting any war against defenseless human beings in order to enrich the already obscenely rich is another crime and it only produces more anger and creates more 'enemies' ('terrahwhists' in this case like others before, re: Vietnam) than reduces their recruiting arguments.

Besides: just walking across the street here doen't keep us safe...



Ed: typos :(




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I agree.... just using his own mantra
because some folks in the public, still seem to buy it.

Btw, your arguments are very succint and compelling. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Please please stop protecting me, George!!
The Bush Administration is more like a protection racket--in reality the protection is a form of assault and exploitation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Maybe we should just start calling it what it is: The Bush Syndicate
rahter than the administration. Plus the WaPo article this morning on the hiring and running of the CPA based on 'loyalty' with no concern with any qualifications rather makes the term "administering/administration" not seem to apply to bushco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lusted4 Donating Member (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. If you were going to a gang fight would you pick * to be in your gang?
maybe for cheerleader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. Resign
I'd feel a hell of a lot safer if this lunatic* would just go away, hell at this point I wouldn't even lock his ass up, just go away georgie*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Tell that to the victims of Katrina
that he refused to lift a finger to help.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think he wants to keep us safe like the gimp in Pulp Fiction--
locked up in a trunk until he needs us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. if he were telling the truth our ports and nuclear power plants would have
been properly secured years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC