Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rumsfeld Unveils New Justification For Iraq War: High Gas Prices

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 02:22 PM
Original message
Rumsfeld Unveils New Justification For Iraq War: High Gas Prices
Prior to the war, the administration stressed that the United States needed to invade Iraq because Saddam Hussein possessed WMDs and had connections to al-Qaeda. None of that turned out to be true.

Now, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld has introduced a new rationale for the invasion of Iraq, high gas prices. From a radio interview last week:

SECRETARY RUMSFELD: The fact of the matter is - if Saddam Hussein were still in power in Iraq, he would be rolling in petrol dollars. Think of the price of oil today. He would have so much money. And he would be seeing the Iranians interested in a nuclear program, he would be seeing the North Koreans developing a nuclear program, and he’d say well why shouldn’t he - and he would. So we’re fortunate that he’s gone.

Of course, one of the reason gas prices are high is instability in the Middle East — created, in part, by the invasion of Iraq.

Digg It!

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/17/rumsfeld-gas-prices/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ok, so why didn't gas prices fall back in 2003?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. and THANK GOD our Vice President isn't "rolling in petrol dollars"
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. From a supply side perspecive
one of the reasons gas prices were lower prior to March 03 was the fact that Iraqi oil was being pumped and shipped. Now, they can't keep the pipelines open for long before they're blown back up. And, oil is still being pumped unmetered by Halliburton. This doesn't explain why gas prices are lower now. Its not like Iraqi oil all of a sudden came back online.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Exactly what I was going to say. Prior to the invasion, they were pumping
up to 2.5 million barrels of oil a day and there was up to 6 million barrels per day of spare capacity from OPEC, that 2.5 million got knocked offline and the prices shot up. If Saddam was still in power and pumping oil, he wouldn't have the same amount of petrol dollars as, oh let's say the Saudis have right now because of the lack of spare capacity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. "he would be rolling in petrol dollars"
Hardly likely given the fact he was selling his oil for Euros. That was suspected as being one of the unlying reasons for the war.

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12239,896344,00.html

Hence similar concerns about Iran although they seem to abated for now : http://www.energybulletin.net/7707.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thank goodness he saved us. Now go jump out in front of a speeding bus.
You miserable wretched little man
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Rumsfailed is a freakin' War Criminal.
Now he has finally stated why an Illegal Invasion was launched. Hey, it was about Blood For Oil afterall.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Great pic. In contrast...
Edited on Sun Sep-17-06 04:11 PM by madmusic
Scholars asked for protection of Iraq's relics
Pentagon says military never agreed to defend antiquities

(04-16) 04:00 PDT Washington -- Last week's plunder of Iraq's national museum, one of the Middle East's most important archaeological repositories, occurred despite repeated requests to the Pentagon by experts and scholars that the site be protected when U.S. troops entered Baghdad.

A senior Pentagon official said the military had never promised that the buildings would be safeguarded.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/04/16/MN166192.DTL

EDIT: dumb typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subterranean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. Of course Rumsfeld has the ability to see into the future
and he's never been wrong about anything before. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Iraq's national museum
Busholini's Military couldn't spare about 20 Troops to stand in front of Iraq's national museum? Bushit! They didn't even think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC