Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jack Cafferty read my email on the air - re: Electronic Voting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Jeanette in FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 06:09 PM
Original message
Jack Cafferty read my email on the air - re: Electronic Voting
His question during the 5 o'clock hour was: Should Electronic voting be outlawed? All of the responses were excellent. Mine was the second one read. Woohooo!!

BLITZER: Let's check back with Jack Cafferty for "The Cafferty File" -- Jack.

CAFFERTY: Wolf, the question this hour: Is should electronic voting machines be outlawed?

There are serious questions about how reliable they are and how tamper-proof they may or may not be.

Mark in Colleyville, Texas, writes: "I'm a software engineer with many years of experience on many different computing and controller platforms. E-voting, as we have it implemented now, should be banned. No self-respecting software engineer implements any kind of software without hard-copy/paper audits. It blows me away anyone would allow implementation of any kind of automation without audits."

Jeanette in Florida: "Jack, everyone is wondering if democracy is at risk because of electronic voting machines. How do we know democracy wasn't already lost in 2000 and 2004? We will never know with certainty that those elections weren't tampered with. Back to paper ballots and hand counting. If it takes longer, so be it. At least we will know our votes counted."

Bobby in California: "Should electronic voting machines be outlawed? No. But they should give out paper receipts as proof of the voter's input."

Jim in Texas: "Jack, this is how to fix it. The electronic vote would tally and then kick out a printed receipt. If Wal-Mart can do this with every sale, how difficult can it be? The voter would then verify their votes were counted and correct. The voter would then insert the printed ballot in a software-free reader, like IBM used in the '50s, to tally the votes. If the tallies didn't balance at the end of the day, there's something rotten in Denmark."

And Sam in Oceanside, California: "How come we can get a paper record for our financial transactions, but we can't get a simple paper trail receipt for the most important right we have as citizens: the right to vote? I will tell you why. The people in power don't want us to."

If you didn't see your e-mail here, you can go to CNN.com/CaffertyFile, and read some more of these online -- Wolf.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. CONGRATS Great letter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cspanlovr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Your's was the best one. I just knew it had to be a DUr!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. You go girl....
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. You got a great rhythm going in your letter. No wonder he read it.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Very Cool! Yours raised more questions that ppl should contemplate.
Very COOL!:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. I heard it!!!!
Edited on Mon Sep-18-06 06:33 PM by me b zola
Great letter, Jeanette! You tied the questions being raised now about e-voting to the past 2 presidential sElections--and got it read on the air!!! :thumbsup:

:woohoo: Jeanette in FL, :yourock: :headbang: :bounce: :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. Congratulations, Jeanette!
Your email was great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. Rec #10 for an excellent job Jeanette!!
Bustin with DU pride!!

:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. Miss Waverly gives a kick
for a great job, thank you for reminding people about the 2 stolen elections.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. good going!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. Cool. NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. I saw it! Way to go! Mine showed up on the website but he didn't read it
on the air. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeanette in FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. Here's Karl's from the website. WTG, Karl
Let's make this simple: Would you do business with an ATM that didn't give you a paper receipt?
Karl, Wagoner, Oklahoma


And thanks to all of you for acknowledging my email that Jack read. What a feeling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. Good analysis. As a note, we need *paper ballots* not a "paper trail".
Edited on Mon Sep-18-06 07:39 PM by w4rma
We do *not* need paper receipts because then certain buisnesses will require you to show your receipt for who you voted for in order to keep your job, or certain groups of people will offer other types of bribes if you show them your receipt for who you voted for.

Paper ballots. Paper ballots. Paper ballots. I cannot stress the fact that our ballots must, themselves, be paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
14. How cool is that! Congrats! And thanks. No transparency =
No Democracy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QuestionAll... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. why can't voting numbers be like ATMS....
and as secure.
would have been my question, maybe I'll ask it some day to someone who give a flying fuck.

but really.
why .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Why?
Because they know that as things progress ever closer to the edge of total government control over every facet of our lives, people will begin to get upset and vote the bastards out!

Therefore, the way to ensure that the government gets and keeps control is to control how the votes are counted. That's why.

But you already knew that, didn't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cybildisobedience Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. Congrats...
Great job -- and thanks for taking the time to make your voice heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
17. WAY TO GO, JEANETTE!!!!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
19. Good work, watched hiim read it!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judaspriestess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
20. Congrats
You are a star now, in all seriousness, congrats on an excellent email
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
21. Great job..
... these letters that get published and aired are invaluable to achieving our goals. Good work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
23. Excellent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Libby2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
24. Great job!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
25. I heard that yesterday!
Congrats!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
26. You rock, Jeanette!!
Stating a powerful, succinct idea---in one or two sentences--is an art!

You did VERY well.

I really liked how you questioned the 2000/2004 elections, too!

Kudos to you!! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
27. Wow!! How great is that?!
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
28. Great job. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
29. CNN
I kid you not, have read mine three different times. I bet they were being smart alec when the read the one when they asked the question about the bush assassination movie. I said Americans did not want bush to be killed...Look who was waiting in the wings...cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC