Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton: "I am sick of Karl Rove's bullshit."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Opusnone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 08:20 PM
Original message
Clinton: "I am sick of Karl Rove's bullshit."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eat-the-press/2006/09/18/remnick-on-clinton-on-eve_e_29704.html

New article (23 pages) in New Yorker, by David Remnick.

"Clinton on the vote to go into Iraq: "I'm sick and tired of being told that if you voted for authorization you voted for the war. It was a mistake, and I would have made it, too....The administration did not shoot straight on the nuclear issue or on Saddam's supposed ties to Al Qaeda prior to 9/11."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah. What the Republican critics of Dems who voted for it
...are really criticizing is being dumb enough to trust Bush, which is what the Dems did. I guess we've learned our lesson by now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. does "did not shoot straight" mean they LIED?? why not just say it? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Opusnone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Because he is still a politician
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mazzarro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I am TIRED of Dems not saying directly that Mr. bush LIED!
If Dems had started doing so long ago, I think that by now it would have come to be an accepted conclusion and would have impacted his approval rating negatively. Also it would have made it a lot easier to counter all this cage rattling and fear mongering claims he has been making lately. I even believe that the sooner Dems started pasting him and his administration as liers, the better we will be in countering the inevitable October surprise that is bound to come from KKKarl Rove!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Opusnone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The talking point now is that everyone thought there were WMD's
It's a hard one to get around in a sound bite society, but the best answer is "WE didn't invade another country because of what we thought MIGHT be true."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. Good point, but everyone didn't believe Saddam had WMDs
2001: Powell & Rice Declare Iraq Has No WMD and Is Not a Threat

A more detailed version of who said what, when

Experts Believed No Iraqi WMDs in 2001

I've done my part. Now fit that all into a sound bite.

I've got a good counter to the 'stay the course' sound bite: But we're headed for the rocks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I'm tired of the Dems not talking about war profiteering....
For the life of me I can't understand how republicans could dig up anything, but not one democratic leader is talking about the Carlyle Group, or Halliburton. ...We haven't heard about the Bird flu since Rummy got his cut.

Why aren't we talking about PNAC and RAD? These are all facts, why aren't the Democrats using them?!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. I'm tired of Clinton speaking out of both sides of his mouth. 2 months ago
Edited on Tue Sep-19-06 07:56 AM by blm
he said RFK made a compelling case that Kerry actually won. IN FRONT OF ALTERNATE PRESS.

Then he never followed up on that remark in any public way. Now he's back to mocking Kerry as a loser in the mainstream press. What an asshole.

Clinton couldn't have even won in 1992 if it hadn't been for certain Senators and congressmen riding Bush1's ass throughout his entire term and exposing alot of his covert and corrupt dealings. And the main senator leading the way was John Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parisle Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah, great,.... but..
.....Clinton needs to say that to Bush's face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. What Clinton really needs to do is sue Disney and ABC.
Until he does I won't have any respect for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niallmac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. What makes millions of people here and in other countries so smart?
They and I demonstrated in the streets before the Iraq War started because we knew in our hearts it
was a crock. That's why we marched.

Do you wonder why I have such a hard time with people who live inside the Beltway
being fooled about the war?

It's almost like they feared the fear driven nationalist frenzy momentum that had enveloped the
country at the time and forgot what defending the Constitution was all about.
Ya know? It's almost like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. On WaPo's Susan Schmidt
"A Xerox machine for Ken Starr."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. Feingold understood what it meant
He did not vote for it or cave into the pressure of Patriotism... I am so proud of him...


I don't care if anyone voted for it, only that they have since renounced their vote...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
11. Clinton could have STOPPED showing up on TV supporting Bush 2001-2004
Edited on Tue Sep-19-06 07:50 AM by blm
for starters.

Did Clinton have ANYTHING to say about how sorry he is that he closed the books on IranContra, BCCI, Iraqgate and CIA drugrunning so Poppy Bush could have a "peacefyl retirement" ?

Doesn't he regret that he let Poppy off the hook for supporting and protecting terrorism all those years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
14. Dupe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Dose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
15. How is it that WE KNEW they were lying and Congress didn't?
WE KNEW and we were posting that Powell lied to the UN, KNEW and were posting that Bush lied about yellow cake, etc. etc. etc. I still want to know how the hell that happened. Every Democrat who voted for authorization needs to explain that to me. :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
17. Hans Blix was out there telling us there were no WMD
along with David Kay and even the Chimp's own Darfur. They all said the same thing. It wasn't what they all wanted to hear. The Chimp still says that Hussein "wouldn't allow the inspectors in," when actually, they had to leave because the war was about to begin regardless of their opinions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
18. The only "deer in the headlights" that I saw, was bush at the debates.
Kerry handled himself just fine.

Clinton is the quintessential politician. And I'm not saying that as a compliment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. 59 MILLION VOTES
Kerry attracted a lot of fellow deer in that case.
Clinton is really over-reaching with that kind of charaterization. God he can be annoying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
20. If was a fundamental error to hand over the authority to declare war
to the president. It is unconstitutional and unprecedented in any democracy, and took the US closer to totalitarian rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Yes, and that "fundamental error"
cost lives. I don't think that's an acceptable error, no matter who defends it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Gonzalez admitted a few months back that IWR did NOT give them war powers
Edited on Wed Sep-20-06 08:51 AM by blm
For the last few years they have been SPINNING the IWR as if it did give them full authority, but it never did. The media let them get away with it and repeated the WH line that it was a vote for war. It never was.

Democrats who kept saying that Bush was rushing to war without first allowing the guidelines to work were shouted down in the media, and even by some on the left who refused to hear them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC