http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=2468837&page=1The latest in a series of bizarre controversies centers on the Virginia Republican's recently discovered Jewish heritage. During a Monday debate with James Webb, his Democratic opponent, Allen snapped at a Washington, D.C., television reporter who asked whether his ancestors included Jews: "To be getting into what religion my mother is, I don't think it's relevant. So I'd like to ask you, why is that relevant?"
The exchange with the reporter quickly gained steam on the Internet, where bloggers called on Allen to answer the question.
On Tuesday Allen confirmed his Jewish connection in a written statement, slamming the reporter's question as "reprehensible." The reporter, Peggy Fox of WUSA-TV, said she got the idea from an article in the Jewish weekly newspaper The Forward, which has looked into Allen's possible connection to a Jewish family that moved to Italy centuries ago.
In his statement Allen wrote, "I was raised as a Christian, and my mother was raised as a Christian. And I embrace and take great pride in every aspect of my diverse heritage, including my Lumbruso family line's Jewish heritage, which I learned about from a recent magazine article and my mother confirmed."
---------------
It almost sounds as if george allen was ashamed to admit he had Jewish blood in his veins. What's so reprehensible about bringing up one's cultural and religious heritage? It was so long ago, and certainly no source of shame.
I'll bet if you looked really hard, you'd find that the allen's also have some other blood flowing in their veins, maybe even Negro blood, it happens more than most folks realize. And george is right, what diff does it make? If it's true george then why is it reprehensible for a reporter to ask?