Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT editorial: Warner, McCain, Graham have little to show for defiance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 12:51 AM
Original message
NYT editorial: Warner, McCain, Graham have little to show for defiance
Edited on Fri Sep-22-06 12:52 AM by DeepModem Mom
Editorial
A Bad Bargain
Published: September 22, 2006

....About the only thing that Senators John Warner, John McCain and Lindsey Graham had to show for their defiance was Mr. Bush’s agreement to drop his insistence on allowing prosecutors of suspected terrorists to introduce classified evidence kept secret from the defendant. The White House agreed to abide by the rules of courts-martial, which bar secret evidence. (Although the administration’s supporters continually claim this means giving classified information to terrorists, the rules actually provide for reviewing, editing and summarizing classified material. Evidence that cannot be safely declassified cannot be introduced.)

This is a critical point. As Senator Graham keeps noting, the United States would never stand for any other country’s convicting an American citizen with undisclosed, secret evidence. So it seemed like a significant concession — until Stephen Hadley, the national security adviser, briefed reporters yesterday evening. He said that while the White House wants to honor this deal, the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, Duncan Hunter, still wants to permit secret evidence and should certainly have his say. To accept this spin requires believing that Mr. Hunter, who railroaded Mr. Bush’s original bill through his committee, is going to take any action not blessed by the White House.

On other issues, the three rebel senators achieved only modest improvements on the White House’s original positions. They wanted to bar evidence obtained through coercion. Now, they have agreed to allow it if a judge finds it reliable (which coerced evidence hardly can be) and relevant to guilt or innocence. The way coercion is measured in the bill, even those protections would not apply to the prisoners at Guantánamo Bay.

The deal does next to nothing to stop the president from reinterpreting the Geneva Conventions. While the White House agreed to a list of “grave breaches” of the conventions that could be prosecuted as war crimes, it stipulated that the president could decide on his own what actions might be a lesser breach of the Geneva Conventions and what interrogation techniques he considered permissible. It’s not clear how much the public will ultimately learn about those decisions. They will be contained in an executive order that is supposed to be made public, but Mr. Hadley reiterated that specific interrogation techniques will remain secret....

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/22/opinion/22fri1.html?hp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. So in other words they caved.
Is this not important enough for the dems to filibuster? Is the safety of our troops, the Constitution not important enough to expect that much? Or will they be afraid of supporting 'terra' and go along? This will be very telling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. It was all a photo op
They didn't cave, they planned it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eringer Donating Member (338 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
30. McCain, Bush's hand puppet
McCain is an idiot. He thinks that W. will help me get the nomination. What a joke he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Damn straight he is. McLame is doing his best to look tough...
morons* polls are in the toilet(regardless of what that rightwing spin machine gallup says)and mclame wants to put up a show as the guy who is the person who is out to clean up the ethical issues in washington.

bait and switch. smoke and mirrors.

mclame is morons* ass puppet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
34. Yep, politics as usual.
Politics trumped principle......again. As usual. The Republican party merely wanted to make a show of their "displeasure" with Bush's policies. Sure, they "stood up to him". :eyes: Now they can go home and preach to their choirs about how they stood up to the big, bad Bush. In the end, it was all sound and fury, signifying nothing.

The Republican party cares MUCH more about appearances and politics than the real safety and security of America's citizens. But, what else is new? :shrug: Retaining power is the only thing that matters to Republicans, the power to fuck up our country beyond belief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
25. .. just a little pas de deux
A dance step, in Rove's Opus, "Election '06"

McCain caved before about torture. He had NO problem with shrubbie's "I don't have to if I don't want to" signing statement the LAST time the legislature got involved... Why should the torture business engage him more this time around?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
40. ONLY repukes were "permitted" in this "conference" - and we are somehow
surprised at this outcome?!

And the whore media says NOTHING about this BLATENT PARTISANSHIP - but let a single Democrat dare utter a criticism of a repuke - and they scream for weeks about "being biparitsan".

The silence is deafening.

And I can bet my life and entire fortune that if and when the Democrats retake control of any branch of our government, they will voluntarily initiate or bend to the demands of the repuke to "let it go" and NOT undue this travesty!

Bet on this prediction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. Memo to the Senate Democrats: Filibuster, goddamnit
and let America know the madness stops here and now. Or resign. All of you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
23. Which Dem leaders have spoken out against this monstrosity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. President Clinton has spoken out against it.
I hope that 40+ others were listening and filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
36. No, they have to "keep their powder dry".
For those instances when it's REALLY needed. :eyes: I can't imagine what could make them filibuster anything. They've let the RepubliCONS have everything they've wanted without using the filibuster yet. Perhaps if the Bushies wanted to legalize the wanton murder of Democrats without penalty THEN they'd use the filibuster. Maybe.

We've got so much fucking "dry powder" right now we could solidify the Atlantic Ocean with it. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
41. Oh, no - we are told we must "suck it up" one more time & vote Dem again.
Even if our Dems continually DO NOTHING.

I'm lucky that my candidates are OK. But if I were in some other state like Connecticut where that cretin LIE-berman is running AGAINST the dem, maybe causing the dem to lose, if LIE-berman wins, I would NEVER support him, no matter what party he decided he was in on any particular day. NEVER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scone Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. fillibusters & signing statements
Filibusters trump signing statements, no doubt. But most Senate and House Democrats are desperate to out-fascist their fascist Republican counterparts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
26. Hi scone!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Email that editorial to your Senators.
And you Rep.

One can write, "I agree with the following editorial."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. Scratch a rePuke and what do you get??
Nothing. An empty shell with no heart or subsance. Vacuum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. Does No One Think About
Edited on Fri Sep-22-06 08:19 AM by iamjoy
I sort of posted this point sarcastically in another thread about this, but I am really worried.

If BushCo can refuse to follow the Geneva Conventions (on torture) because it is "vague" what is to stop something similar from happening in our civil justice system? Could Dubya not later announce that the Eighth Amendment (cruel and unusual punishment) is "vague" and allow criminal confessions obtained through torture?

Too often I have heard people defend such incursions on our civil liberties (illegal wire tapping, etc) by saying "if you aren't doing anything wrong, you don't have anything to fear" - but this is not true. We know that even the best cops (to say nothing of the few hate filled ones with an agenda) make mistakes, get the wrong guy. We know that the most innocent of actions or statements (not to mention ones that are wrong, but not criminal) can be misinterpreted.

Does no one realize the danger or am I just being paranoid?
(heck of a board to post this question)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnlal Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Humanity is a vague concept to Republicans
The Geneva Conventions require nothing less than Humane treatment of prisoners. If Bush finds the term to be vague, and needs definition or guidance, it says a lot about him and his kind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
29. 8th Amendment is clearly under perview of Supreme Court
any attempt to "clarify" cruel&unusual by this Admin would certainly go before the SC.

Although, it certainly doesn't help that BushCo has packed the SC with their neobot minions... :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
47. You are not, "just paranoid".
"Beware the camel's nose", goes the old proverb. This is the camel's neck. :grr: :banghead: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oc2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
8. Moderate republicans have no balls, if they did they would of left the

party as independents..

The Bushies and the Fundies control the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peaches2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Bush now is all-powerful
If the Repukes have no balls as you say, and this is proof they don't nor do they even have any self-respect, then the Dems have even less. We are now officially under the rule of our dictator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnlal Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. I agree
We have allowed the story to be about how Graham, McCain and Warner feel. The media focused on three republicans, as if they were the opposition. The media, and the American people were misled again. When the dust cleared, we see that a compromise has been reached between the Republicans and the Republicans. The focus has been taken away from the Democratic opposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnlal Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
10. Anyone who still believes in moderate republicans...
is living in a fantasy world. McCain is the worst of them. He is so two-faced that I can't believe he has any credibility anymore. In the run-up to the mid-term elections, it has been widely reported that republican candidates have been "keeping their distance" from President Bush, even while they are allowing him to raise funds for them. If the so-called "maverick" of the Republican party is so quick to knuckle under to torture, you can bet that the rank-and-file have no more independence. This torture vote is the knife that will cut through the veil of Republican independence in the upcoming elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
39. And now he's "praising" the agreement
as if they actually accomplished something. He IS the worst of them, because it's for political gain and nothing more. The other two, as far as I know, have no presidential ambitions.

The truth is, though, that people who only read the "librul" newspapers think he IS a maverick - which makes me sick. He is Bushes puppet as much as, or even more, than most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
12. Wankers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
14. What is the Times talking about? Little to show?
McCain, Graham and Warner all got lots and lots of air time, and they held up this odious piece of legislation for almost 96 hours before agreeing to a compromise that deprives the administration of using the monogrammed cattle prods it so badly wanted! You call that "little to show"?

I'd call it less than nothing.

Well Senate Democrats; your powder should be good and dry, as long as you've held your fire. Time to cut loose, don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mazzarro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yeah right!
I'll believe it when I see it - them Dems really cutting it loose, I mean!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Agreed. This is "put up or shut up" time for the Democrats in
congress. If torture and fascist show trials are not the place for a "line in the sand", I don't know what is. This is a defining moment for the Democratic Party. This is where, if they can't stop this fascist shit, they walk out and hold a separate, legitimate congress until the elections in November. If the Americans vote the fascists back in or the fascists steal another election, then it's civil war.

Anyone who thinks that this isn't the issue to bring this country to a screeching halt, hasn't been paying attention. This is it. This is the one. This is who we are. If this bill goes through then we have to come out, full bore, a never relenting insurgency. We have to show this fascist government and the rest of the world who we are. This is it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jawja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #16
24. This is not just a defining
moment for the Democratic Party. It is a defining moment for America.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EarthNeedsHope Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
17. And the Democrats are silence
God, pelosi and reid are stupid! They need to get in on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I think they need 6 more Senators
on their side. For the moment they are powerless, and it is not their fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
19. Enough is enough
If it's not torture, then Cheney has to go through it before they use it on prisoners. These nazi clowns are doing everything in their power to make torture legal. Even the one concession, that the jury and defense see the same evidence, is stupid, because it allows the prosecution to remove names, details, times, locations out of the documents, information that is vital to deciding if the information is credible or not. The way they wrote it, you can have a report that says XXXXXX said the defendant was planning to kill XXXXXX in XXXXXXX on XXXXXX. Jury sees defendant and kill, but not the source or even if the guy was around at the time he supposedly made the threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
20. lesser breaches of the Geneva Conventions decided by Presidential fiat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
21. you better give em hell harry
he was quoted here the other day promising this would not come to the floor. it f'ing better not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
22. i just called McCains office..and i said
as a woman who's entire family has been in the military.i want to thank Senator McCain for his wondeful photo opps regarding the Geneva Conventions...( the guy on the phone started to thank me for the call..and i kept on speaking..)

then i said i hope i get the opportunity to meet and be in a public place with senator McCain so i can thank him in person..by spitting on his feet ..and the ground in front of him..as he no longer deserves to walk the hallowed ground of the UNITED STATES of America...i said he is a coward of the worst degree..and i hope he rots in the hottest of hells for the sentence he has just placed on our soldiers , now , tommorrow and forever.

then i said tell him i said go to hell!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StatGirl Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
27. The word "defiance" is just another propaganda term
It implies that Bush has the right to call the shots, and anyone who disagrees with him is a child or a subordinate who deserves punishment or a slapdown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
32. McCain is no maverick. John Warner is a reactionary conservative.
Lindsay Graham is a LIAR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
33. Does anyone now not understand how Nazi Germany happened?
And Bush isn't even using gangs of thugs beating up people. Just worried about their image, about getting elected again, these people "compromised" for what? Explain to me..for what. Does the idea that protecting one innocent person from torture come into their heads? That governments, men, make mistakes all the time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
35. Except a sore ass channel...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
svbackstreets Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Habeas Corpus
To me the worst part of all this is that the President can disappear people on his say so and they have no right to a hearing. So you're not a foreigner or an unlawful combatant? Tell it to the judge.

Oh sorry you can't!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughttheater Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
38. Tongue-in-cheek visual of the Grand Opening of "Tortureland"
See a tongue-in-cheek visual of the Grand Opening of "Tortureland"...here:

www.thoughttheater.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
42. It really is
a sad day in America, that three Repuke Senators and one piss poor excuse of a President could inflict on 300 million people a disastrous policy with irreversible consequences with their so called "compromise". I say it that way because the opposition party leaders and Senate Democrats appear to be silently standing aside and watching it happen. Democracy is dying a slow painful death and I for one feel helpless to stop it, FAXING, Emailing, letter writing and phone calling our Representatives seem to be falling on deaf ears and blind eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annm4peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. MN Senator Mark Dayton's
Minnesota's Senator Mark Dayton's office said he would vote against the bill.
Sen. Coleman's office didn't know how he would vote.

* What did your senator have to say ??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
44. This whole fiasco was just another Repuke stunt.
I never believed for a minute that Warner, McCain, Graham were serious about their overly publicized objections to Bush's "program". They just proved me right.

They have their heads so far up Bush's tush that I can't tell where they end and he begins!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
45. Am I the only one wondering if McCain, Graham & Taylor put on a pony show?
Oops, I meant to type "McCain, Graham, & Warner." Don't know where that typo came from.

But seriously, it looks like they made a big stink to show that the administration is willing to compromise, then passed along a compromise bill that still protects some pretty onorous shit (like removal of habeas corpus) without according to the ACLU specifically prohibiting most of the torture methods that are validating the worst claims of our enemies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
46. I want to wash my mouth out with soap...
for EVER saying a kind thing about McCain. He claimed that he would take a stand on this issue even if it cost him the presidency. Bullshit. You bent over for your rogering just like always. You were TORTURED in Vietnam. Doesn't that give you any compassion or understanding for those who are suffering torture now, or will in the future, in our name?
I guess not.
You have no integrity.
You have no honor.
You disgust me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC