Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Chavez stuff is a Rove distraction - its not important

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 01:25 AM
Original message
The Chavez stuff is a Rove distraction - its not important
Who gives a rat's ass about what someone said in a speech?

Heads up here, folks. We have an incredibly important election coming up less than 2 months away. Focus on getting people out to vote and helping Dem candidates win.

Getting a Dem majority back in Congress is the most important thing to focus on right now - so lets get to work.

If you're all wound up one way or another about someone's speech, try getting out to your local Dem campaign headquarters and signing up to volunteer for some phone banking or other campaigning.

Sheesh, this is silly. You're playing right into Rove's hands, he's loving it.

Let's get to work and save democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kick
Testing for GOP disruptor factor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
34. K&R



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. Agreed, the Chavez stuff doesn't matter
But the fact that Pelosi and Rangel went out of their way to condemn it does.

Have they done that on torture yet? Secret prisons? How about the DSM and the Liar in Chief?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. They had to say something
But now its time to get back to important issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 04:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
25. Indeed they have
Why not do some basic research before making such insinuations. Rangel has been very outspoken on the torture issue. Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Right. First of all, cali
...don't get snotty with me. I've done nothing to deserve your attitude.

Basic research? Done. Can't find anything about either Rangel or Pelosi having gotten in front of a corporate media camera since last Friday to say something about Bush**'s pro-torture tantrum, although I'd be happy to admit that I'm wrong if you'll provide links.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R.
Amazing the stupid shit over which people will throw great Americans like Charlie Rangel under the bus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. Ummm... I never thought I'd say this, but...
Amen, OzarkDem.

}( ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thanks
This stuff gets old after a while, doesn't it? I've got insomnia tonight and I don't feel like reading a bunch of freeper talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Now that Pelosi, Rangel and Clinton have buried the myth...
... that Democrats cheered on Chavez' comments, why do DUers continue to burn the straw man?

It's fuckin' maddening. Six weeks out. I can't belive this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaptBunnyPants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #10
21. Because Chavez is a good man, who's used his political power
to benevolent ends. That means a lot to me. The reforms he's bring to Venezuela are bringing health care and the fruits of modern life to people who have never had that before, and politically empowering people who had previously just been part of the nameless, faceless underclass. We are talking about a country that, despite it's immense wealth of natural resources, had upwards of an 80% poverty rate when Chavez came to power. While other world leaders out there are just lining their own pockets, Chavez is actually addressing the needs of his people. He's a South American Huey Long, forcing energy companies to pay a decent price for their oil, and investing that money into infastructure.

It may have been politically easier for Pelosi and Rangel to buy into the beltway view of this incident, but I don't think it was right. And I doubt we will see the political benefits you imagine. The right will continue saying whatever they think will placate their audience, regardless of our response, but I doubt this episode could ever have gotten any real political mileage for Bush. People don't like him, and they haven't liked him for a long time; that's not going to change just because some guy named Hugo Chavez doesn't like him either. And most people I meet tend not to be as squeamish about namecalling as our political and media elite. Bush called a reporter a major league asshole, and I think that was one of the only endearing moments he had in the entire campaign. It didn't hurt him in the polls, and it made him appear almost human,(no small task)...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
found object Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
11. A link to all the "silliness".
http://www.vheadline.com/readnews.asp?id=67379 Actual transcript of Hugo's speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Right, its not important
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Change has come Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. read these threads...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
13. Right - standing up to US imperialism is irrelevant.
Rather we should follow the ques of our supposed representatives and take the opportunity to rally around the asshole in chief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Right now
we need to focus on getting a majority back in Congress. If we can't do that, the rest is meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Amen, amen, amen!
I'm here to fight the Republicans........and win.

I ain't here to bury my own!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. Why is it so hard to understand?
If you want results, you'll need power. You'll need to win one of the chambers of Congress back. Hugo Chavez has nothing to offer us to meet that end. There are no "Bush is Evil" fence-sitters. Either you think he's evil, or you don't, but you definitely made up your mind a long time ago. The current rhetoric stokes the flames, but it doesn't bring the votes.

And none of this, absolutely none of it, matters if we are defeated in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
15. Totally unimportant.
ChimpCo is afraid out of their minds. They don't know what to do. All they can do is exploit shit like this while they shake in their boots about November.

They are going to try all sorts of other shit before November. But everything I see is going against them.

I don't know what the Sam Hell is going on with the candidate polls, but they can't be accurate. The pollsters are missing something important going on under the radar.

Optimism rules:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=2189847&mesg_id=2189847
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaptBunnyPants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
18. Your right, it's not important.
Just depressing, that's all. I just hope there never comes the day when it will be politically expedient for the Democratic Party to condemn me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
20. agreed, corporate media distractions will be constant
I'm already yacking up syrup and cotton candy and I only watched 1.5 days of the crap.

I'd no idea what TV news had become since I couldn't stand it after the Iraq invasion lies. It's even worse!

Do people not see what's being perpetrated on them? Who watches that shyte?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
22. So Rove wrote Chavez' speech?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmboxer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
23. What's the difference between the Pope Calling Bush the Antichrist
and Chavez calling him a Devil?! If you look at Bush's record, could you call him an angel?

Republican media is trying to bring up the polls in favor of Bush, however, the polls don't matter, the number of voters do not matter, it's the damned Republican voting machines that have been stealing the elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #23
31. The Pope never called Bush the antichrist. That was one of Wayne
Madsen's fiction pieces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
24. You're right.
Frankly, I think the Dem leaders, Rangel and Pelosi did what they had to do, now let's move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
26. This is the best "Chavez" thread I've seen.
K&R!

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
27. K&R for the "Suicide by Chavez" crowd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
29. If *'s unpopularity is where is allegedly is then these democrats
made a colossal mistake - they could have ignored Chavez, instead they rallied around Chimpy. What a way to alienate their base.

They are like the Washington Generals - just for show, intended to lose but there to put on a show of a game so the Globetrotters can show off.

These are the incumbents, too.

They also appear to think that they need to do this to win, which shows they think freepers are the majority, and so they are appealing to THAT, rather than their base. They are actually trying to appeal to the minority that still thinks Chimpy is the greatest and strongest leader ever. That's pretty sad, because those people are going to vote Rethug anyway.

We can comment on this stuff, even six weeks from the election, thank you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
30. It shouldn't BE a big deal
but in the heartland it is. Right now you have millions of folks who voted Republican who don't like/trust the current administration anymore. They don't know WHAT the hell to do. Vote Democratic? Scary. Very scary. They are those folks who do all that radical stuff all the time....we're not sure they are even FOR America! They seem to want things to go bad for America. This Chavez feller comes in here and badmouths our government on our soil...well, that Rangel feller and that Pelosi lady... they did the right thing. That's the American way. We stick together. Nobody talks about our own that way except US. You know, I just might vote for those Democrats after all. They're REAL Americans.

This is what I am hearing now. It's all about spin and numbers and this won't play well in Peoria if the Democrats are seen as getting behind a foreign ruler.

Just my opinion...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoping4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. I couldn't agree more. Actually its a win-win for Dems not to denounce
Chavez. Its a win because like you said it expresses the outrage in the heartland so its the right political move. But its also a win to denounce Chavez because no matter how much they denounce Chavez nothing is going to erase what he said. People in the heartland may feel outrage but as the saying goes "throw enough dirt on the fan, some sticks".

I think the remarks might have struck deep because they were so surprising and they were uttered by a Populist who was talking the language of an Christian Evangelical. Had he denounced Bush as a capitalist pig it wouldn't have had much effect.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed-up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
32. agreed-major distraction-Contitution or Chavez????? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
35. Anthing that distracts people from the REAL issues helps Bush
expect them to keep pulling more and more stunts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
36. Did we need this thread? I pass over the stuff that I think
Edited on Fri Sep-22-06 02:46 PM by katinmn
is a waste of time.

Like so many other topics, Chavez is here today, gone tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snivi Yllom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
37. it sure is important to those who are more upset Chavez got spanked
Judging by the real estate at DU currently devoted to Chavez's UN speech, the passion to defend Chavez's is far stronger than the passion to win back the house and senate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
38. I agree that it is a distraction, but how is it a "Rove" distraction?

Karl Rove asked Chavez to call chimpy the devil?

Or did he ask Pelosi and Rangel to condemn the speech?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Rove wanted the natl discussion to be on terrorism. He was successful
until the UN meeting. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CelticWinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
40. I said this last nite and will say it again tonite
I dont have time to worry about Chavez, I laughed my ass off when he called fratboy the devil, but it is time to move on and get our act together so we can get our country back! We have things to fix here and its not comparing notes to see if RoveBot told Chavez what to say. To be honest if you worry about it your playing right into KKKarl's blueprint for destruction. We have elections coming up and now is not the time to be distracted on the issues at hand. Repugs love it when we get our panties in a bunch and lose focus on whats going on....that is when they screw us and they dont give us a kiss in the process. The time is now to stay focused on the elections and getting the evil ones out of office.
Thanks for letting me rant
Celtic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC