Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. threatened to bomb Pakistan back to the Stone Age

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 06:34 AM
Original message
U.S. threatened to bomb Pakistan back to the Stone Age
http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-pak22.html

WASHINGTON -- President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan says the United States threatened to bomb his country back to the Stone Age after the 9/11 attacks if he did not help America's war on terror.

Musharraf says the threat was delivered by Richard Armitage, then the deputy secretary of state, to Musharraf's intelligence director, the Pakistani leader told CBS-TV's 60 Minutes.

''The intelligence director told me that {Armitage} said, 'Be prepared to be bombed. Be prepared to go back to the Stone Age,' '' Musharraf said in the interview to be shown Sunday on the CBS television network.

It was insulting, Musharraf said. ''I think it was a very rude remark,'' he told reporter Steve Kroft.

But, Musharraf said he reacted responsibly. ''One has to think and take actions in the interests of the nation and that is what I did,'' he said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe, maybe not ...
Who can believe anything that comes out of any of the Friends-of-George's mouths ?

:shrug:

earlier discussion: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2523368
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Repos don't have the patience or skill for diplomacy.
If you get in their way or don't cooperate they'd rather just shoot you to get you out of the way. Diplomacy is for sissies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. General Curtis E. Lemay
Every soldier thinks something of the moral aspects of what he is doing. But all war is immoral and if you let that bother you, you're not a good soldier.
Curtis E. Lemay

I don't mind being called tough since I find in this racket it's the tough guys who lead the survivors.
Curtis E. Lemay

I think there are many times when it would be most efficient to use nuclear weapons. However, the public opinion in this country and throughout the world throw up their hands in horror when you mention nuclear weapons, just because of the propaganda that's been fed to them.
Curtis E. Lemay

I'd like to see a more aggressive attitude on the part of the United States. That doesn't mean launching an immediate preventive war.
Curtis E. Lemay

If you kill enough of them, they stop fighting.
Curtis E. Lemay

Killing Japanese didn't bother me very much at that time... I suppose if I had lost the war, I would have been tried as a war criminal.
Curtis E. Lemay

My solution to the problem would be to tell the North Vietnamese Communists frankly that they've got to drawn in their horns and stop their aggression or we're going to bomb them into the stone age.
Curtis E. Lemay

Native analysts may look sadly back from the future on that period when we had the atomic bomb and the Russians didn't.
Curtis E. Lemay

Sometime in the future - 25, 50, 75 years hence - what will the situation be like then? By that time the Chinese will have the capability of delivery too.
Curtis E. Lemay

That was the era when we might have destroyed Russia completely and not even skinned our elbows doing it.
Curtis E. Lemay

That's the reason some schools of thinking don't rule out a destruction of the Chinese military potential before the situation grows worse than it is today. It's bad enough now.
Curtis E. Lemay

We should bomb Vietnam back into the stone age.
Curtis E. Lemay


http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/c/curtis_e_lemay.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. Why is he saying this now?
Methinks there is more to this story than meets the eye.

Pervez Musharraf has no reason to complain. His submission has paid off EXTREMELY well for him. He got over $4 billion (?) in loans forgiven. The US gave him MiG fighters worth several billion I believe we gave those to him. The US has helped keep that dictator in power.

So what's his problem now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. Looks Like Armitage Is Being Set Up Again
In the run-up to the Iraq invasion, this regime attempted to strong-arm a bunch of our friends for this misadventure. There was the pressure applied to Turkey to allow this regime to open a northern front in Iraq and all the goodies they were willing to give away (and probably did). It'd be interesting to look at all the "deals" worked with "coalition of the willing" and how much corruption and coersion was involved.

Ain't it particular that Mr. Armitage's name is being tatooed on this one...right on the heels of the Plame situation. He's now become a right wing whipping boy and by putting this one on him it will stop him from discussing the Plame situation or even joining Joe Wilson's lawsuit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC