Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Musharaff tells that Bush threatened to bomb Pakistan into stone age

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
liberaldemocrat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 10:58 AM
Original message
If Musharaff tells that Bush threatened to bomb Pakistan into stone age
Edited on Fri Sep-22-06 11:10 AM by liberaldemocrat7
after 9-11 if he would not help get Al Qaeda and the Taliban you can probably say that the notion that the Bush administration threatened to bomb the Taliban into the stone age in July 2001 because they would not go along with the gas and oil pipelines, had more value and appears close to the facts.

Musharaff has given credence to the Bush provocation that Dasquie and Brisard told of in their Book "Forbidden Truth"



In the Bush press conference Bush appears to have lied that he did not realize his administration threatened Pakistan after 9-11 and Musharaff would not say anything until his new book comes out but apparently he will say that on his interview with 60 minutes.

Comments on the Bush provocation of the Taliban before 9-11?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Damned straight!
If Bush -- and particularly Cheney -- had not been elected in 2000, then September 11, 2001 would have been just another day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I believe it
I'm starting to accept how truly vile and evil this cabal really is. I think I'd rather be plugged back into the matrix and forget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's possible
that in the early days of the B*sh administration that the left hand didn't know what the right hand was doing.

Maybe Armitage threatened Pakistan not knowing that they were "in", same as pre-911 some agents tried to investigate Saudi links to terrorist funding but were then told to back off.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's sorta one thing to threaten the Taliban
They were and are nogoodniks. What's amusing is threatening them over the oil pipeline. That was always a pipe dream, so to speak. One guy with a high powered rifle could keep it shut down permanently after spending billions to build it. Could the owner really expect to pay off every person in Afghanistan with a good rifle?

Threatening Pakistan is an entirely different order of threat. This is a relatively powerful country with its own nukes. If I was Pervez, I would have said, fine, but say byebye to New Dehli.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The pipeline is happening.
The Russians filled the void we left behind. The route has changed, but there's many dollars to be made. errrr... rubles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC