Maybe it's just me, but my head is spinning right now after reading the story on CNN about President Bush and his reaction to the report that the US threatened to bomb Pakistan if they did not help the US with its war on terror.
First, Pakistani President Musharraf says he was threatened by the US:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/09/22/bush.musharraf/index.htmlThen, President Bush feigns shock at the story: "I was taken aback by the harshness of the words," he said.
And finally, the spin: "All I can tell you is that shortly after 9/11, Secretary
Colin Powell came in and said President Musharraf understands the stakes, and he wants to join and help route out an enemy that has come and killed 3,000 of our citizens."
The implication here is that it must have been Colin Powell - currently on the outs with the administration - that made the threat to the Pakistani President.
Of course, the truth is very different: Richard Armitage, then U.S. deputy secretary of state, is the official whom Musharraf identified in the CBS report. In an interview Friday with CNN, Armitage denied the allegation.
Is it just me? Am I seeing spin and dodging where there isn't any? Or will people run with this and decide, if the threat was made at all, that it came from Colin Powell? Nothing like a deceitful offense to make up for a pitiful defense, right? Make Colin Powell spend time defending himself against this crap, and he won't have any time to keep fighting the administration on the importance of the Geneva Convention.
Okay, off my paranoid soapbox now.
John Hulsey
Cpl/USMC
1985-1989
(All quotes in this post are from CNN at http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/09/22/bush.musharraf/index.html.)