Jack Cafferty wants to know...

[me b zola]

Listed times are EST.



4 p.m.: Was Iraq better off under Saddam Hussein?

5 p.m.: What does it mean if the United States threatened to bomb Pakistan "back to the Stone Age" unless it cooperated in the war on terror?

7 p.m.: Would you give up sex if you could live to be 100?

http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5t.html?65

[elehhhhna]

1. oh honey jack just got quite an email from Elena. Watch for it.

[npincus]

4. can you post it?

[elehhhhna]

7. I lost it when hit send...doesn't show in sent items.

Says (5:00 Question)

Bush is a sick b-stard, and HE LIED about it again today, Jack: (followed by some select parts of my op, here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=2196493&mesg_id=2196493)

[notadmblnd]

2. my answers

1. yes

2. it means that once again it shows that the bush admin are lying hypocrites

3. one big giant OH HELL NO!

[me b zola]

6. I'm thinking about this for the 7pm

Only if the rapture-ready crowd gets their wish first.

[me b zola]

3. My answer for 4 pm:

Not only was Iraq better off, but the US was better off with Saddam in power. We would have 2600 families that would not have to be grieving the death of a loved one, over 10,000 families who would not have to deal with a severe or capacitating injury of a family member, and we would have our 300 billion dollars that could have been used to secure cargo in passanger planes, secure nuclear and chemical plants and secure our ports. The destruction that was done to both of our nations based on the lies of this administration is reprehensible.

[elehhhhna]

9. make that 2,697

http://icasualties.org/oif/

[WCGreen]

5. My answer to the five O'Clock question.

Jack,

First off, it doesn't surprise me that the threat was made given the swinging male appendage attitude the administration has, but I am perplexed as to why Musharif told 60 minutes about the threat, knowing it would come out during his visit to the UN and before his little with the Bush. Perhaps he doesn't feel so "threatened" by the Bush administration now that he see's how swimmingly things are going in Afghanistan and Iraq.

And, it makes him look better in the eyes of those enemies who may be stirring in the Western Provence of Pakistan.

[Imagevision]

8. U.N. expert: Iraq torture may be worse now

GENEVA - Torture in
Iraq may be worse now than it was under
Saddam Hussein, with militias, terrorist groups and government forces disregarding rules on the humane treatment of prisoners, the U.N. anti-torture chief said Thursday.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060921/ap_on_re_mi_ea/un_iraq_torture;_ylt=AmPNku4J.r45ZmLXteXNrSms0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3OTB1amhuBHNlYwNtdHM-

[shadowknows69]

10. One: Bullshit question.

two: It means we're terrorists

three: What would be the point of living to 100?

[elehhhhna]

11. 3, no. Who wants to be married THAT long?