Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reverse-speak is a common feature of generative grammar among the Bush-men

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 06:48 AM
Original message
Reverse-speak is a common feature of generative grammar among the Bush-men
For example, the participle "am", "am not" is known as a Reverse Intensifier Clause.

Often used to mean "am not precisely",

as in the statement:

"I am NOT Beelzebub, Lord of Sulphur!"

Chomsky could provide more insight into this, but to put it in layman's terms, among the Bush-men, "AM NOT" usually translates to "IS". Example: "IS our children learning?"

In this case, "IS" is used as an unknown tense in standard English, the negative future conditional progressive. Roughly translating to normal English as: "I am assuming our children are not and will continue to not be learning?" This is the reverse of the Irish and Welsh tense, "I do be", as in "I do be learning to play the flute."

TAKE-HOME ASSIGNMENT:

Identify five examples of Bush-speak and diagram them for semantic meaning.

EXTRA CREDIT: Field work amongst the Bush-men will count towards your masters in Linguistic Anthropology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. So...
"I am NOT Beelzebub" is Bush-speak for "I is Beelzebub"? Or, as Samuel Bodman would put it, "He didn't mean it literally."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Possibly. However, In Bushspeak, "He didn't mean it literally" means
"He DID mean it literally, but I'm not going to tell YOU that."

However, this statement is only expressed in the "neutered" gender commonly used by White House spokesmen.

Rarely is the question asked, "Is I El Diablo?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. OW! My heard hurts wading through that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Now you know how Bush feels.
I had to take Linguistics in college.

Someone should parse Bush's speech and identify the roots of
pre-historic grammar.

For example, he repeats words often. In Pidgin English and other languages, this is a form of syntax used to distinguish meaning. Could Bush mean something when he says, "Fool Me, Fool, Can't be fooled again?" Coded messages, perhaps?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. Great observation-some of the other characteristics used by BFEE:
symbolism, noetics, neurolinguistic programming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Noetics?
Isn't that the War on Christmas? No wait, that's Noelist. ;-)

LG (who never got THAT good at linguistics)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I thought the war on Christmas was...
"Antichristestablishmentnoelism".

I am not being contentious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. No, you are being nonchristmous. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
9. Michael McDonald: "I do be brothers"
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC