Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ABC plays P2 9/11, Wallace ambushes Clinton, Rove promises Oct suprise

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 10:24 AM
Original message
ABC plays P2 9/11, Wallace ambushes Clinton, Rove promises Oct suprise
hmmmm -

Had a thought this morning. The WashPost did an article on Wallace's ambush of Clinton right above one on the doubts over the death of bin Laden story and suddenly I had a EUREEKA! moment...

Why did ABC push on against all protests to air P2 9/11? To establish the Clinton did it meme in the average Joe's mind. Next Wallace invites Bill on to chat about his latest initiative and ambushes him with the why did you let bin Laden get away b.s. (Clinton destroyed Wallace, but all people will see is the talking heads describinf Bill's "Dean Scream" moment)

Rove has promised his Oct suprise will secure the House and Senate for Repubs. The suprise may have been leaked a bit early. Osama may be dead already but Rove probably did NOT want THAT news out until he secured Bill saying that HE had done more than anybody since to try to get bin Laden.

ta-da! It all plays out - if slightly off schedule. When bin Ladens corspe is "found" in the next couple weeks the wingnuts can replay over and over again Clinton's "scream" and how bush has made us all safer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. But Chee-knee recently made it clear that the WOT is bigger than
any one person, which downplays the importance of getting OBL. Of course, my statement assumes that the corporate hoores will actually air Chee-knee's comment, which even I have to admit is a stretch. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. I have a different take...
Edited on Sun Sep-24-06 10:33 AM by GR
I think this is another yellowcake type of deception. A deliberately planted and incorrect story in an obscure French newspaper on a tip from our hand holding friends the Saudis.

What it is meant to do is create a bit of doubt about whether on not bin Laden is dead or alive and also to provoke another video from Osama...

Remember that the Osama Video just before the 2004 election helped Bush and Rove wants another one.

Even if he's dead, they'll create one for the gullible American public whom 46% of believe that Saddam was behind 9/11, even after all the facts for years have said otherwise.

Also, though, I think the NIR trumps Bin Laden dead or alive in importance and I'm hoping the American people will realize that too.

But the dems must make sure that message gets out, because the newsmedia won't get the job done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skarbrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I'm thinking something like this also. Along with OBL being terror news.
Keeps the horrors of Iraq down to a minimum amount of news time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm beginning to wonder if CW and the collective herd of MWs are among
the most evil people who ever lived, the hypocrisy, the mendacity, the disingenuousness, the outright lies and distortions, the purely evil partisan and ideological intent of subterfuge at the expense of this Republic and over 90% of its inhabitants, but I've been wrong before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. "CW" ?
sorry - don't know the acronym
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Chris Wallace, presumably
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Chris Wallace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. It seems obvious that most news is edited in Karl Roves office
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC