Bin Laden is dead, the secret got exposed too soon

[greenbriar]

I bet busy boy is livid...

I think it is great!


I plan on spreading this one long and far



they WILL NOT get credit for this!!!

[C_U_L8R]

1. it's like air going out of a very sad balloon.

pfffffft...a very sad and flaccid republican balloon.

[Gman]

2. On the contrary, they want him alive

OBL is of no use to Bush or Karl Rove dead. They have a deal with OBL that goes back to the Friday before the election in 04.

[greenbriar]

3. no they wanted to tell the world they killed him in the war on terra

in mid October so they could "win" and announce the homecoming of the troops

now they have to attack Iran instead

[NJCher]

12. au contraire

OBL is of no use to Bush or Karl Rove dead.

The republicans have perfected mass manufacturing of terrists and if you don't believe me, just read the story at this link:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/24/washington/25terrorcnd.html?hp&ex=1159156800&en=2b04aade4ece2412&ei=5094&partner=homepage

This front page NY Times story tells how their policies have made terrorism an even larger problem than it was to begin with.

Now they have a terrist in every corner and for every purpose! They'll never run out of terr and fear.




Cher

[Gman]

23. Oh, I believe you

and I already read the article. One way or another, they're going to keep generating demand for weapons of war be it with or without OBL.

Seems like we're playing this guessing game every two years now.

[babylonsister]

17. Yep, they work for and off of each other. nt

[sweetheart]

22. It was scheduled for act IV

The stage manager screwed up.

[zanne]

4. Oh shit.

Now they'll have to invade Iran to win the elections.

[Warren Stupidity]

5. Or Bin Laden is just fine thanks

and they are trying to coax a communication out of him for tracking purposes.

[Flabbergasted]

6. Suddenly they're interested in tracking him. Why?

[savemefromdumbya]

21. 3 guesses

[kenny blankenship]

7. Y'mean Bush let OBL die of natural causes& killed 100,000 Iraqis instead ?

[whistle]

8. Link????

[Name removed]

10. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[whistle]

11. Oh, well here you are....

http://english.ohmynews.com/articleview/article_view.asp?no=319196&rel_no=1

[pretzel4gore]

13. hahahahahaha!

:rofl:
hahahaha....

[valerief]

9. Maybe the October surprise is that the U.S. is going Chapter 11.

Only kidding.

[Hoping4Change]

14. Well,either bush wanted to keep this silent or its another CIA goofup.

Hmmm. I wonder how they'll spin this if OBL has bit the biscuit.

[bluerum]

15. Well,,, the way I see it,, the NSA or CIA can always make another

OBL. A different name and a different face but they will train and finance someone to fulfill the roll of political foil.

After all - this administration ain't nuthin without their evil do'ers.

[Jack Rabbit]

16. I think you are assuming that this was to be the October surprise

I disagree.

It's looking more to me like it's some kind of action in Iran.

So spread this far and wide:

Although she may become one several years down the road, Iran is not now an immdiate threat and there is no reason to take any military action against Iran at this time. Such action would be unwise for many reasons. Our enemies, demagogues like Osama bin Laden, will use this action to incite the Arab common people against the US. Once Iran is attacked, it will need to be occupied. The occupation of Iraq has already stretched our military too thin. That in itself would have consequences more devastating than any imagined consequence of withdrawing from Iraq. If we cannot handle the occupation of Iraq, what would make anybody think we could handle the occupation of a nation two and half times larger, both in geographical space and population? And, while a system of government where a council of twelve stuffy old men get to decide who is a good enough Muslim to run for public office is by no means a democracy, there is in Iran's political structure some sense that the people are governed by those who have their consent to govern. It isn't the brutal tyranny of Saddam's Iraq; there is even less reason to believe that US troops will be welcomed as liberators in Iran than there was in Iraq.

Sorry that can't be fit into a thirty-second spot or a ten-second sound bite, but I've seldom heard a rational argument put in a thirty-second spot and never in a ten-second sound bite.

Killing your television is the beginning of reason.

[greenbriar]

18. this thread was an experiment and it did not disappoint

we are flushing out moles right and left


:)




for the record, I still think he is dead!!!

[Swamp Rat]

19. k&r

[savemefromdumbya]

20. the bogeyman is the Iranian president now

move over Osama

Colin Powell said he was dead already in 2002