Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Musharraf says "CIA Paid Pakistan for al-Qaeda suspects"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 02:12 AM
Original message
Musharraf says "CIA Paid Pakistan for al-Qaeda suspects"
US spy agency CIA paid Pakistan for al-Qaeda suspects: Musharraf
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060924/wl_afp/pakistanusattacks

"In response a US Department of Justice official was quoted as saying: "We didn't know about this. It should not happen. These bounty payments are for private individuals who help to trace terrorists on the FBI's most wanted list, not foreign governments.

Our relationships with international leaders is not something we are prepared to talk about," a CIA official told The Times."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't this roughly how these felons populated Gitmo?
Our government is full of felons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. That's my thoughts. They bought suspects to ah..."interrogate"
Edited on Mon Sep-25-06 10:59 AM by Solly Mack
aggressively

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. how sick is that
in our name no less, damn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. And let's face it, if the CIA is buying "suspects"
you know they interrogated them...

they are probably at GTMO...or some other American run prison

being held indefinitely

and I have no real good reason to doubt that the CIA is paying governments for suspects either

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. sure they have interrogated them
the discussions concerning torture proves to me they are guilty. All they are really accomplishing is more hatred for the united states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. I suspect they were paying for warm bodies.
They needed to get their "captured terrorists" to market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 03:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. They needed a group perp walk. Rumny saying, " These are
Edited on Mon Sep-25-06 03:43 AM by sfexpat2000
the most dangerous terrorists in the world!"

That's what he said as we marched those 85% innocent people into Gitmo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
19. it's exactly that sick
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Musharraf is saying a lot of things that are being denied by
the people he says said them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
20. The state dept is pleading ignorance
and the CIA is not commenting

Armitage denied he said it

Mushie's book is gonna fly off the shelves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbrother05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. K and r
For the morning group
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. "We didn't know about this"
Once again the Bush** maladministration proves either its knowing complicity or its utter incompetence.

"We didn't know" should be written on each of their tombstones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 03:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. "No one could have imagiined" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Perfect answer!
ha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
24. that's the standard answer isn't it?
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. Wouldn't be at all surprised if so. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
26. Exactly. The state dept admits they pay private individuals
Money is constantly missing from the war on terror

the CIA is funded in ways no one likes to talk about

and with a group that "aggressively interrogates" using "alternative techniques of interrogation", paying a government to buy people isn't that hard to imagine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. Mushy's days are numbered
just like the previous dictators of Pakistan. He is going to be in an "airplane crash", or some accident soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. That seems
increasingly likely. It will increase he destabilization of that part of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:32 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Why is he now revealing these things?
Is his honeymoon with the BushInc. over?
Has he made a deal with the Taliban and al Q to stop trying to assasinate him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. He is being pushed
hard from two sides. About 90% of his recent remarks are aimed at keeping forces within his country from killing him. He is trying to make the case for why he has had to deal with Bush & Co. I think it is fair to assume, for example, that Mr. Armitage absolutely made the "stone age" comment. He is trying to show that he kept the US from striking/invading his country.

The source of the increased tensions comes in part from the administration's wanting to nab bin Laden before the fall elections, but even more as a result of the possibility that the Bush-Cheney administration will strike Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #12
27. I don't doubt Armitage said it
it's in keeping with the "hard edge" persona of the Bush Regime
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Right.
I also think that a reasonable person would have concluded at that time that there was a mighty good chance that Pakistani intelligence may not have been on our side on 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. reasonable assumption at the time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Even now
there are parts of ISI that are against Musharraf's siding with US instead of Taliban. There are hardliners and Taliban sympathizers in Pakistan's ISI and Defence establishments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. there was news blurp this morning in Germany...
"worries over coup in Pakistan while M. away"

worries were said to be groundless

my husband said " leaders come to the US and coups are popping up all over"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbrother05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. 2 words: Book Deal
Got to play up the gotchas while he's on the US stage. If he said the same thing at home, it would be on page 23. Now he's getting lots of press and his sales will skyrocket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
35. Now that's an understatement.
If Mushariff falls Pakistan will likely come under the rule of Taliban-types, all those NUKES will come under the control of religious crazies. WW3 will begin with Delhi being turned into radioactive glass...

:nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
13. where is he today?
Which side of the Pond????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #13
22. Last word was in texas for a check-up...iirc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
15. So ahh, why are we in Iraq if we can just pay people to capture
"terists"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
16. How much is "AL QUEDA GUY #2" worth? We "caught" him about 10x already...
Do the math.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 11:07 AM
Original message
Isn't like 14k terrorists "suspects" held in US "prisons"
all over? Isn't that the number they quoted when Shrub admitted America had secret prisons?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
30. Yeah, they've already got 3, 4, 5, and 6. They just turn them ...
... in one at a time so they are always getting bounty money for number 2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
21. well... cash is king.
Unmarked euros, i'm sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
34. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC