Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2001 Anthrax Attacks against Dems not "military grade"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 08:56 AM
Original message
2001 Anthrax Attacks against Dems not "military grade"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/5377744.stm

US attacks used 'common anthrax'
Investigators believe anthrax used in a series of attacks in the US in 2001 was not of military grade as originally thought, a US newspaper reports.

-----
Always remember *who* were targeted in these attacks. Maybe that's why nothing much has been done to bring anyone to justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. And it took 5 years to come to this conclusion, why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. It took 5 years for the military psyops
.. to be in gear enough to rewrite history and make everyone forget that
they supplied WMD's against US civilians, an utterly disgraceful act,
that those WMD's exist to start with, and that they got out.

But why deal with the real issue, lets just re-edit perception
in a vacuously informed public, OJ simpson could never have worn that bloody glove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Because, as long as we believe it is military grade, all roads lead
to Ft. Detrick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. oh good grief any college microbiology student can culture it
It occurs naturally in the soil anywhere livestock, and particularly cattle are pastured. All "weapons grade" means is that it can be effectively dispersed without destroying it or having it degrade under normal environmental conditions, and that it is made in a concentration and quantity adequate to cause infection.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. I call BULLSHIT
The anthrax was military grade, or it wouldn't have diffused through the air so rapidly and caused the shutdown of Congressional office buildings while offices and the ventilation system were decontaminated.

Ordinary anthrax spores are covered by a thick, waxy coating that helps them survive in soil but which render them very heavy and unlikely to cause anything but cutaneous (skin) anthrax. They woudln't have contaminated anything but the desk where the envelopes were opened.

This is utter and complete disinformation. It was weaponized anthrax, something we knew at the time. They tried to blame it on Iraq, which had abandoned its attempts to weaponize anthrax using Bentonite to abrade the outer coating. The strain of anthrax led directly to the CIA lab at Ft. Detrick.

Too many people out here in workaday land have read about weaponized anthrax, how hard it is to produce and handle, and what sort of facilities are necessary to fill envelopes and scrub their exteriors without contaminatng the environment and causing multiple deaths for them to ignore any more.

This is a lie. It was an inside job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sure, NOW the anthrax was no longer weapons grade ...
and yet, more potent than the leftover "chemical weapons" that Iraq had left over from before Gulf I, that Bush and company said was such a threat to our country ...

Remember, in the early days of the war, the soldiers were not responding to "Democracy threats" when they had to put on their biohazard suits when the alarms sounded ... they were "prepped" for chem/bio warfare ... not "liberation" ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think this is CYA BS
For 5 years they said Military Grade now it is common "oh anybody can get it and that why we have not got the perp" Anthrax
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Same with the Pakistan Connection...
London Yank posts this on DKos:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/9/18/82548/4524

And the Corporate Media publishes the "Bomb them back to the Stone Age" Rumor:

http://edition.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/09/21/pakistan.threat.ap/

Someone is trying to cleanup all the most damning MIHOP evidence...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truthiness Inspector Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. Very strange that it took 5 years
to figure this out. Hmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truthiness Inspector Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. dupe, double posted somehow n/t
Edited on Mon Sep-25-06 09:59 AM by Truthiness Inspector
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC