Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wikipedia: How Journalist Chris Wallace Was Attacked By President Clinton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 11:09 AM
Original message
Wikipedia: How Journalist Chris Wallace Was Attacked By President Clinton
Edited on Mon Sep-25-06 11:15 AM by kurth
September 2006, Wallace interviewed former President Bill Clinton. The interview aired on September 24, 2006 on Fox News Sunday. Before the interview, it was agreed that Wallace would ask Clinton about the Clinton Global Initiative along with some other relevant political topics. <2>

As the fourth question of the interview and citing popular demand via viewer-submitted email, Wallace asked Clinton about the steps his administration had taken to eliminate the threats from Osama bin Laden. After an initial rebuttal, the visibily agitated Clinton made a personal attack, accusing Wallace of performing a "conservative hit job". Clinton remarked:

So you did Fox's bidding on this show. You did your nice little conservative hit job on me, I want to know how many people in the Bush administration you asked this question of? ... And you've got that little smirk on your face and you think you're so clever. But I had responsibility for trying to protect this country. I tried and I failed to get bin Laden. I regret it. But I did try.

In response to Clinton's charge of bias, Wallace said that Fox News Sunday had asked Bush administration officials "plenty of questions" of that sort. The left leaning media watchdog group Media Matters for America disputed Wallace's assertion. <3>

After the interview, Wallace commented, "All I did was ask him a question, and I think it was a legitimate news question. I was surprised that he would conjure up that this was a hit job." <4>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Wallace_(journalist)

-----------------------------------------------------------

Poor little lapdog, he was just trying to get the former president to answer this little question from the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. I trust that'll be corrected. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh poor Chris Wallace
that piece of pre-owned, slightly used toilet paper is surprised that Clinton called a turd a turd?

Shit by any other name still smells like shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. The big dog exposes the RW agenda and tactics with the truth and that
is an attack: may the big dog attack relentlessly through out the election campaign, exposing every Repuke lie and disastrous policy and action and showing them the same mercy as those we torture are shown mercy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. this should piss Hillary off as well.
she's gutsy when she's protecting Bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good grief.
Edited on Mon Sep-25-06 11:25 AM by greyl
Isn't much of the quote attributed to Clinton fabricated? I only saw a clip of the interview, but in it Clinton said "You're asking me this question on Fox", not "So you did Fox's bidding on this show".


edit: Reading the transcript linked to from wikipedia, it looks like he did say that.
Good for him. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. I hope he sues ABC for everything they've got
and then when the Democrats take over congress it will be great to see ABC loose their license.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. This part's funny
The article describes him as a "conservative journalist" yet offers no supporting details about what makes him conservative.

Likewise, this article offers no supporting details about what makes him a "journalist."


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chris_Wallace_%28journalist%29

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. Jeez, now the wingnuts rewrite history **immediately** after an event...
Edited on Mon Sep-25-06 11:36 AM by KrazyKat
If I weren't at work, I'd log into wikipedia myself and correct all that bull****. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
8. Check the edit history...
...and watch out for those Keebler elves...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. Clinton's objection, DID YOU ASK THE BUSHIES THIS QUESTION
was entirely appropriate, and Wallace lied. He has no idea if the questions were ever asked, but he assured Clinton they had. Let's see the PROOF, Chris.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. so what's wallace complaining about - Clinton answered the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. That damned Clinton, how dare he defend himself!!!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. love it. everything ends up on Wikipedia !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC