Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who got further under Big Dog's (Bill Clinton) skin?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 12:52 PM
Original message
Poll question: Who got further under Big Dog's (Bill Clinton) skin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't think Chris Wallace got under Clinton's skin at all
I think the explosion happened because Clinton fully expected Fox to put him up to it. You don't get mad at the dog for biting you, you get mad at the dog's owner.

Speaking from watching (as well as having) many so-called "explosions" here myself, sometimes when you force yourself to assume goodwill in spite of all evidence to the contrary, the actual proof of ill will sometimes elicits, even deserves, a response commensurate with one's disappointment. I like to think of it as aversion therapy.

(I know at least one of the admins disagrees here, but that is my unapologetic stance.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I disagree, Sui G, ONLY because he made a crack about Junior's
annoying smirk (I really wish he would've hauled off and smacked that brat!).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. I read the full text - yeah I didn't know about that until just now
I can't imagine being Clinton and having to deal with these morons, year after year after year.

The guy has worked his entire post-presidential career doing humanitarian work. I just don't see GWB doing anything but clearing brush until his diapers get too poopy and they have to put him in a home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. OMIGOD, SUI, can you imagine ex-president dubya???
The very idea of a George Walker Bush Presidential Library is enough to make me wince.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. I would say Amy Goodman, no doubt about it...
Clinton knew when he went on Fox that he would have to put the smack down on the interviewer. However, I don't think he expected Amy Goodman to be so tough on him, and getting hit from the left instead of the right probably irked him a bit more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Stupid Premise...Stupid Poll..
Hope I haven't offended anyones sensibilities with my remarks..

But where is the benefit in creating MORE chaos?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Duly noted, Tellurian
It's probably my fault though; I couldn't help, as I was watching Clinton and Junior going toe-to-toe, but be reminded of the other famous incident where Clinton lost his temper with an interviewer: his WBAI call-in with Democracy Now!'s Amy Goodman on Election Day, 2000. Now this is before I found DU; I don't know the consensus on the board was at the time.

You haven't offended my sensibilities, btw, though it would appear that I've offended yours which was certainly not my intention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. No, Montauk, no..
Basically, I'm against divisiveness.

This was the first time the X-prez has had the opportunity to speak
candidly about a hot button issue in a very long time. I think people
are misinterpreting his tone...He's an attorney! He wasn't angry, unless
you think raising your voice to preclude someone from high-jacking your
response denotes anger.It doesn't. He was assertive calling a spade, a spade,
and wresting control to be heard loud and clear. Thats all..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Well, I think he WAS angry and THAT'S GOOD; ha-ha time is over.
It's that fire in the gut that's gotten him to where he is; it's passion, AND I DON'T BLAME HIM! 9/11 was a TOTAL Bush fiasco (not to mention the utter destruction of the economy, et al); the guy gets REWARDED with a second term (ballot box shenanigans notwithstanding), and the previous Prez gets all the blame (let's face it, we ALL KNEW the neocons would pull this trick, we all knew it).

Also, I think he's had ample opportunity to voice his disgust with the whole thing; Clinton's been on numerous interviews where he could've just talked about how the Repubs jacked America, but he took the high road and concentrated on other issues. Didn't he, in fact, go toe-to-toe with the late Peter Jennings (ah, that's another name I should've included in the poll), when (iirc) he was doing the book promo tour?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. That is his particular cache`
"Also, I think he's had ample opportunity to voice his disgust with the whole thing; Clinton's been on numerous interviews where he could've just talked about how the Repubs jacked America, but he took the high road and concentrated on other issues."

Yes, my observation as well. However, if he's willing, there is still room for improvement. He possesses the raw materials.He needs to reformulate his style (somewhat) to create an entirely unique presence. Suppress and redirect the passion inward, (you can't lose what is part of you), let them see smoldering smoke, never the fire. Command respect without asking, utter words they hang on..let them count his breaths. Stupefy them with his gifts, spellbinding oratory skills; intellect, infused with fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Amy Goodman? When, how, what????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. right before the election - 2000
when he pardoned a couple of idiots but not Leonard Peltier (spelling?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Other...
Edited on Mon Sep-25-06 01:26 PM by cat_girl25
Monica. :evilgrin:

I know.... bad cat_girl25! :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. I don't think playing the skin flute is the same as ...
... "getting under his skin." Now, "getting under his tighty-whitey's" might be roughly equivalent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. Asshole!!!
Edited on Mon Sep-25-06 09:46 PM by Fighting Irish
I was going to post that!

Then I'd probably be on everyone's shit list.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Counsel Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. Please Excuse My Ignorance: Who's Amy Goodman? :-)
There was someone in Big Dog's book, "My Life", that he said it took all he could muster to keep from slugging. It was while he was still in office. I forget who. Gingrich, maybe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Seriously?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Counsel Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Thanks For the Link!
I just read the interview in question... didn't seem so bad to me, although Big Dog did seem annoyed that a simple GOTV call-in turned into a defense of his record against the far left. Honestly? He should have expected it, considering that it WAS Democracy Now! we're talking about. But hey, Gore was being attacked from both sides, so there ya go...

Hell, at least Amy based her questions on what she believed to be the truth.

Mr. Wallace based his questions on what he KNEW was a lie---and knew most of his viewers wouldn't CARE was a lie. Then, he tried the typical lawyer trick of loading the question, then trying to pigeon-hole Big Dog into some kind of yes/no answer. The idiot forgot that the Big Dog was once a lawyer himself, and knew how to beat that trap... :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. Other: Papa Doc Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
16. i think the Big Dog got under their skin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. better question: who's more stupid? amy or wallace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
18. I thought he remained pretty damned calm considering
the lies being told and the fact the FOX jerk was trying to bait him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC