Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

latest in men's war against women

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 11:56 AM
Original message
latest in men's war against women

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2374100,00.html


Women's rights campaigner shot dead in Afghanistan


A senior women's affairs official who has criticised the Taleban's treatment of women was shot dead outside her home in southern Afghanistan today.

Safia Ama Jan was getting into a car outside her house in the city of Kandahar when two gunmen on motorcycles opened fire.

-snip-

Mrs Ama Jan had worked as the provincial director of Afghanistan's Ministry of Women's Affairs since the Taleban were overthrown five years ago. She may have been targeted for her opposition to the Islamic extremists' attempts to limit women's involvement in politics and education.

As a well known women rights campaigner, she was aware that she was vulnerable to attack and had asked for official transport and personal bodyguards. The Afghan Government rejected these requests. It is thought that she was getting into a taxi on her way to work when she was killed.
-snip-
-------------------------------------

another woman will take her place because we women are more then half of the human population. and we will not stop striving for justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. "She was wearing a burqa when she was shot."
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It's not so much what you wear, but your promotion of civil rights
for women that makes you a target in Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Even in the so-called "evil Iran"
Edited on Tue Sep-26-06 11:59 AM by DaveTheWave
Women are allowed to vote and run for office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Title is pretty inflametory
I don't know -I guess as a man I should be happy to see an uppity woman shot down, but as a person, I can't help feeling disgusted an angry at this murder in Afghanistan.

I suppose one needs to consider whether one is an individual or a category.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. guess you said it all:


"I don't know -I guess as a man I should be happy to see an uppity woman shot down, but as a person, I can't help feeling disgusted an angry at this murder in Afghanistan."


apparently a 'man' can be seperated from his 'person'

so 'man' is a construct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. "[A]s a man [you] SHOULD be glad..."?? Where did THIS construct
originate??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. men's war against women - the title of the post
If men are at war with women - shouldn't i be happy when men do well?

Of course this is deliberately missing the point of my post which had to do with categories verses individuals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. You resent being lumped together with "Taliban men"?
Can't see why...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. You added a word there didn't you?
There's nothing in the original title about the taliban.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. Would you title a piece on George Allen....
"The latest in white's war against minorities"??? Your title is equally as provocative and unfair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. it's not provocative, it's a world known fact
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Where have I been???
Edited on Tue Sep-26-06 12:33 PM by catnhatnh
US Army 72-73....Twice married,5 children, 4 daughters...living in a "minority" area of a white bread city '78-'80 and '86-'90...8 grandchildren 5 grand daughters, 2 of them 1/4 black...
In short, I have "consorted" with both minorities and females and actually have a vested interest (grand daughters) in the protection of both.It doesn't ameliorate my position-your post title IS inflamitory...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm in a what with who?
Here I was trying to get women to like me like me. All this time, I knew I was doing something wrong, but couldn't put my finger on it. You heard me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. That's not men's war against women
It's one sociopath's war against women (or a woman). The degree to which the Taliban is also sociopathic
is a failure of individuals, not of all men.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I'm offended by the title the OP choose and revolted by the act
of religious extremist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Yes a very poor title
Someone has some "issues" they need to work out. It must be terrible to imagine an entire gender is out to get you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yep, next reply from original poster.....
..."See how vicious men are?" coming up in-wait for it- 5-4-3-2-1....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. imagination has nothing to do with world wide facts on the injustice

practiced on women and children
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Speaking of facts.
How many men were killed in Afghanistan today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
34. Doesn't matter ... they were just "human shields"
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hidden Stillness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
18. Yes, It Is a War Against Us
Why is it that every time anyone dares to refer to male bigotry and organized oppression of women, there is little other than vindictive attack, the same phony "you're so unfair; you're tarring us all with the same brush" routine (sometimes ending with, "there's no bigotry against you, you bitch"), and this pretense that every single incident is somehow independent and unconnected to the rest of the pattern. Every single rape-murder lynching of a woman or girl is "personal," or they give the old "mental illness" excuse. They are deranged sociopaths, even though there is no evidence of it, and the act of murdering the "uppity feminist" is often cheered by many others there--are they all psychopaths? Remember the "Montreal Massacre," where the male mass-murderer said, "You're all a bunch of fucking feminists!" before murdering them? It is the result of a pattern of hateful thinking, which was taught and learned, not psychopathology.

A whole world of males paying women half of what they pay other males, and not promoting them--but that is all "individual" and "personal" too, right? Dare to mention their bigotry, and all you get is a group attack of hypocrites, no awareness or admitting of facts, until finally, I assume, the thread is over when the uppity woman has been made to apologize for daring to refer to the structures of things, rather than pretending we are "all free and equal," and that some of us do not block others of us. Remember also, do not refer to male violent oppression of us--convert all titles to "religious 'fundy' "--that's the way the censorship game is played here. "Male bigotry? What? I never heard of it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. You know, lots of men fight for womens' rights
but people like you sometimes make us wonder why be bother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hidden Stillness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. "People Like You" is "Not" Bigotry
Oh, I am so put in my place! If all it takes for you to, what, stop being an egalitarian or equal-rights democrat, is to meet up with an independant perspective in the world, then, gee let me guess, you were not particularly our friend to begin with. You stop having your entire philosophy "because" a woman did not only cheer you and all you do? That is obvious hypocrisy, and doesn't even make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. get over yourself.
you have the audacity to insult ALL men, everywhere, and then wonder why people get pissed at you or take offense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hidden Stillness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Please Learn to Read
Actually, all I referred to were male bigots. It is not my fault if you found yourself there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Horse Hockey! If you feel so strongly about it, at least admit what you
really think. You made it quite clear in your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. Actually, you implictly called all males bigots
And I think you meant to do it.


"Dare to mention their bigotry, and all you get is a group attack of hypocrites, no awareness or admitting of facts"


In that breathtaking statement, you not only called us hypocrites, but you impled that we were bigots who couldn't even see our own hatred of women
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. Then attack the system
Not just men in general. I have no power to do anything. I hold nothing over women. I wouldn't want to. Women want the world? Have at it. Good luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hidden Stillness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Question
Please explain how there is a "system," apart from the people who populate it? Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Fine, then attack all the people who populate it, with your broad brush
Go for it. See where it gets you (isn't that kinda what Taliban men do?) :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
33. Being a normal heterosexual male....
...I am certain I have some amount of societally induced homophobia. Listening to you makes me want to overcome it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. wonder why they don't use assassination to describe it?
It's clearly a direct hit on her for her political role. I guess things aren't going as "swimmingly" as some would think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StraightDope Donating Member (716 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
24. Nice misleading headline ya got there...
Because, y'know, having a penis, I just want to make war on anyone who doesn't.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totallybushed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
29. Hey!
Don't blame men. Don't blame Islam, either. Both are stereotyping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
36. That title is inflamatory and offensive.
I am sick of being grouped with mysigonist morons by man-haters simply because I have a Y chromosome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
37. Locking
This is sexist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC