Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Changes Law: US Citizens Can Be Detained Permanently

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
DrunkenMaster Donating Member (582 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 01:48 PM
Original message
Bush Changes Law: US Citizens Can Be Detained Permanently
WASHINGTON, DC, United States (UPI) -- Revised legislation on military commissions would allow the United States to detain and try a broader range of foreign nationals.

The latest version, agreed to by Republican lawmakers and White House officials during the weekend, is less restrictive than an earlier version of the bill, The Washington Post said Tuesday.

Another provision would bar people held by the CIA or military as an unlawful enemy combatant from challenging their detention or treatment in U.S. courts unless they were tried, convicted and appealed their convictions. Critics said this provision would deny constitutional relief to this group.

The Bush administration and House allies changed the description of how the government could designate civilians as 'unlawful enemy combatants,' the Post said, citing an anonymous source. The new language would be applied to foreign nationals and U.S. citizens, the Post said. The earlier version had been scheduled for a vote this week.

Human rights activists told the newspaper they are worried that language in the new version amounts to congressional endorsement of indefinite detention of anyone who, according to the bill, 'has engaged in hostilities or who has purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States' or its military allies.

Copyright 2006 by United Press International

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Okay this is intolerable and we are going to stop it.
No more Mr. Nice Democrat, this bullshit is over. They are not going to have the authority to detain people indefinitely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. See? See? These Dimmycrats is gittin hoss-tile.
Mr. Bush shud otta puddem all in Gitmo fer dat an trow away da key.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah but we do it BETTER than Saddam Hussein!
So THERE!

ppppppppppppppffft!!!

Welcome to the USSA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. "Welcome to the USSA"
That just about says it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Stalin would be jealous. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julius Civitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Freedom's on the march!
Smell my freedom!

Smell it!!!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Never make it past the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. I wouldn't put it pass these thugs to abolish the Supreme court
they same people who allowed Bush to steal the presidency, now isn't that a slap in the face!

These bush thugs must go!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! can't stand them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. They don't need to "abolish" the SCOTUS. If they steal another election
and stuff the SCOTUS with just one more Alito-style judge, they will have a majority of 5-4 of Bushie SCOTUS judges that support no limitations on the president. That's what they're aiming for.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. You're such a kidder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. Defacto condition
has Jose Padilla been tried? charged?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Fine! Lets start with the members of the current party in power, those
who support this unAmerican act. Them first!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. You should put the real title on it, so that people may verify the story..
Incidentally it is a real story whose real title is:
"Detainee bill would be less restrictive"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. Welcome to the Fourth Reich!
I warned the Freepers back in 2001!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. Link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. Nice compromise, McCain! Such a maverick!
:sarcasm:

McCain: Neocon traitor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. Damn them all to hell. Indefinite detention of ANYONE.
The language is so vague, "hostilities" could apply to any of us exercising our right to dissent. And who decides? Agrrrrhhhhh! :banghead: Our Dems had better pull out all the stops to keep this piece of shit from passing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
18. I am very hostile toward this adminstration.
I expect to be whisked away for some of this special justice when the inevitable crackup occurs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
19. Thats not changing the law, it changes the constitution!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC