Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rumsfeld: unclear when Iraq troops can replace U.S.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 09:20 AM
Original message
Rumsfeld: unclear when Iraq troops can replace U.S.
http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2006-09-27T124423Z_01_L27699613_RTRUKOC_0_US-IRAQ-USA-RUMSFELD.xml&WTmodLoc=NewsHome-C1-topNews-1

TIRANA (Reuters) - U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said on Wednesday that American operations in Iraq would end when Iraqi security forces were able to take over the job, but he would not estimate when that might be.

"Our view has been that it's for the Iraqi people to provide for their government, for the Iraqi people to provide for their own security, and our task has been to assist them during this period, the early days of their free system, so they can develop the security forces capable of providing for security in the country," he told reporters in the Albanian capital Tirana.

He said Iraqi security forces were making progress and beginning to take on additional responsibilities. But he would not estimate when the transfer of authority for security in all provinces could happen.

"One can't predict with perfect certainty the pace at which that will happen," Rumsfeld said. "We do know it is happening."

"Trying to set a specific date just isn't manageable," he said, speaking after a meeting of southeast European defense ministers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. The first two words say it all: Rumsfeld unclear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. My thots exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. When the last helicopter takes off from Saddam's palace
in the Green Zone with assorted terrified Iraqis who made the wrong choice desperately clinging to the runners. That is when Iraqi troops will take over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rsdsharp Donating Member (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Here's what I don't understand
Thanksgiving weekend we will have been in Iraq as long as our total involvement in WWII. In that war we trained more than 5 million men. The average period of time for a US service person to spend in basic training is 9 weeks (it varies by service). After that, they go to Advanced Individual Training, which takes several more weeks. By any stretch of the imagination, the individual is fully trained in less than six months. Is the training running out of the Iraqi's ears when they lay down at night?

If we haven't been able to train sufficient Iraqi troops to "stand up" so that we can "stand down" by now, we never will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I have some troubling thoughts for you:
The Iraqi military, on the whole, is not going to be loyal to the puppet government we installed. Additionally, american troops direct the Iraqi troops, not Iraqis.

They are getting a paycheck since there is 70% unemployment in Iraq. They have to survive and they are going through the motions.

In addition, the Iraqi military is riddled with insurgent factions who know a good place to get guns and ammunition for their fight with each other.

See: Vietnamization. We tried the same smoke and mirrors in Viet Nam and it worked out about just as well as its going to work in IraqNam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigma000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. The US started with an corps of officers and NCOs in WWII
In Iraq, they are starting from scratch. Even those officers recruited from Saddam's army are in need of training on how a Western style military operates.

This takes time. NATO opened up a war collage in the Green Zone last year to train officers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I must have missed that NATO had a war collage in the Green Zone
Where did you hear/read that at? Thanks in advance.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigma000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. In response to a request by the Iraqi Government
NATO has established a Training Mission in Iraq and is running a training centre for senior security and defence officials on the outskirts of Baghdad I just assumed it was the Green Zone

In September 2005, NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer and Iraqi Prime Minister Al-Jafaari opened the Iraqi Joint Staff College in Ar-Rustamiyah, on the outskirts of the capital, where officer training now is primarily taking place.

http://www.nato.int/docu/update/2006/01-january/e0118a.htm

Iraq’s new National Defence College, which NATO helped to establish, opened on 3 September (2006), with the first students beginning courses on 4 September.

The College, which is part of the National Defence University, will train about 15 flag officers each year. Flag officers are very senior officers at the rank of colonel or general.


http://www.nato.int/docu/update/2006/09-september/e0903a.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rsdsharp Donating Member (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Your argument would apply if they were training themselves.
They're not. We're the ones that are training them. We have a corps of officers and NCOs. In WWII we went from a tiny standing army and navy to millions, fully trained and under arms (starting from scratch for the vast bulk of them) by the end of the war. We know how to train troops. We take raw recruits and fully train them in a matter of 5-6 months. It's been three and a half years. If they can't, or won't, grasp the training by now, they never will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Goodness Gracious. Oh My. Heavens to Betsy.
These are just unknown knowns, commas, if you will, flowers in the streets and welcomed as liberators, fight them over there so we don't have to fight them here, and and and six more months, and we'll stand down when the Iraqis stand up(tm), and and and my heavens how time flies. Back to my bat cave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. Replace our troops w/ College Republicans
Edited on Wed Sep-27-06 10:02 AM by Botany
All the campuses across the country bet you we could scrap up
130,000

Ohio State has 300.

Send them if they are so down with bush and the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC