Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Arkansas paper: "when Clinton isn't displaying purple-faced hostility"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 11:12 AM
Original message
Arkansas paper: "when Clinton isn't displaying purple-faced hostility"
Edited on Wed Sep-27-06 11:13 AM by ProSense

It is the label, stupid

Wednesday, Sep 27, 2006
By David Sanders

Many campaigns and candidates fall prey to a problem. It is somehow that every candidate must be like Bill Clinton or Newt Gingrich. The former president and former speaker of the House have been gifted with an incredible command of details.

At a moment's notice both could provide a verbal treatise on most matters of public policy. These days, when Clinton isn't displaying purple-faced hostility toward a respectable journalist, he also provides painstaking details to anyone who will listen about the real and growing problem of Aids in the Third World.

Likewise, Gingrich routinely and systematically lectures about the current state of health care in America. He relates the problems and moves to solutions that will shift the way the American people think about health care, from a mentality entitlement to ownership.

Snip...

What are their labels that work?

He or she says one thing and does another. This an important label to use on a candidate who has changed his or her position on a particular policy initiative. It implies untruthfulness on the part of the labeled. Remember John Kerry two years ago: I voted for the $87 billion before I
voted against it.

http://www.arkansasnews.com/archive/2006/09/27/DavidJSanders/337844.html


Not one bad word about Gingrich or any Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. wtf???!!!
:wtf:
what a piece of crap editorial....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. Has Clinton spoken recently to a "respectable" journalist??
Imagine, displaying hostility towards a man who is paid to hate and lie and drag your name through the mud every chance he gets. Imagine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Are there any respectable journalist left?
WIth the exception of maybe Keith Olberman, I don't hold much respect for any journalist today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Clinton was on Olbermann last week
Only a few hours after he got ambushed at Fox
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. He Spoke To Keith
Ten minutes after speaking with Chris "My Father Is Sooo Ashamed I'm A Whore" Wallace. Didn't seem "purple-faced", though - first one who made that comparison was Drudge - who's too fucking stupid to know the definition of the word "purple" anyway. Saw the tape from several sources - the Big Dog never reached the "flushed" stage, let alone "purple."
Drudge should go back to his orginal job - sexually abusing small barnyard animals on webcam & leave reporting to people with more than a fourth grade education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I think they have Clinton confused with Zell Miller
who was, indeed, purple-faced, but they loved it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. these days "respectable journalist" ranks with "moderate republican"
in the pantheon of oxymorons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. DavidJSanders@aol.com
Edited on Wed Sep-27-06 11:22 AM by MADem
Maybe this asshole would like to hear from a few of us who think that HE's the STUPID one!

ON EDIT--let me share with you what I sent to the fucker. I used the "Biblical" approach (Bubba calls this kind of thing 'triangulating):

Chris Wallace is not a respectable journalist. He's a rightwing tool who doesn't honor his father as the Ten Commandments dictate. Here, read up on your 'respectable' friend: http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/12/11/100751.shtml

But thanks for letting us know where you shake out. Against honoring one's parents, against helping the sick and needy. Makes it easier to see you coming in future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah there are 5 articles or so about the interview up at Townhall
All variations on a theme - "Clinton finally blew his stack and showed us all how crazy he is" "Clinton is so full of himself he can't actually talk about his program to help people, he just wants to defend his "legacy."

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. David Sanders is a RW shill. Years ago, I wrote to him when he was
claiming that recognition of gay 'marriages' in Sweden had led to fewer heterosexual marriages or some such nonsense. He's always going on about the immoral liberals or abortion being the worst thing on the planet or how discriminated against the poor Christians are...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. So when was Clinton "purple-faced"?
I mean, there are cameras rolling all over the place ... if Clinton "stormed out, purple-faced" as the RW media is pushing, Fox would have been distributing that video on Myspace.com BIG TIME ...

It's like the congresswoman who "assaulted a cop" in the capitol building ... no tape, no proof ... and I bet the tape would have exonerated her ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I'vemade several comments about that interview so far.
When I read comments like...lost it, purple faced, enraged, crazy, etc, I keep asking...Have these people NEVER been yell at? Have they NEVER seen anyone really out of control, which is MY definition of loosing it and enraged? These comentators must live in a bubble somewhere! I realize I have afairly long working career, but if they really think that was an example of loosing it, I'd sure like to give them some examples of whatloosing it REALlY is LIKE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. Gingrich doesn't actually give a fuck about health care
he just looks for ways to push for more handouts to the insurance agencies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. Note to Sanders: ALL Congress votes for ONE version of a bill before they
vote AGAINST another version of the bill. Or vice versa.

Dumbass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. That's why compromises exist.
So, is HE stupid, or does he just think WE are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
15. Oh, good grief...
why read anything David Sanders says--he's a Huckabee flunkee. Yes, he campaigned for Huckabee and worked on his staff. You can't possibly think he would have anything nice to say about Clinton. I can't stand the guy and quit reading anything he wrote after my blood pressure went up one day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. Chris Wallace is NOT a respectable journalist
LOL.

That paper lost all its credibility.... if it ever had any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. How does changing your position on a bill equal being dishonest.-
what a stretch. Honestly,these hacks need to get some new lines and some new ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC