Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry, Feingold introduce resolution regarding voting machines

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Blaukraut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:03 PM
Original message
Kerry, Feingold introduce resolution regarding voting machines
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – September 27, 2006

Contact: Zach Lowe (Feingold) - (202) 224-8657

Liz Richardson (Kerry) – (202) 224-2742



FEINGOLD, KERRY INTRODUCE RESOLUTION URGING BACKUP PLANS FOR VOTING MACHINES

Difficulties with Recent Primary Elections Highlight Need for Back-Up Systems Like Paper Ballots



Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senators Russ Feingold (D-WI) and John Kerry (D-MA) have introduced a resolution calling on state and local governments to have back-up systems in place on election day to ensure that every eligible voter who wants to vote is able to. The Senators’ Sense of the Senate resolution notes the difficulties that voters in many states have experienced with new voting technology and urges states to do whatever is necessary to ensure that voters are actually able to cast a vote on November 7, 2006, including providing emergency paper ballots in the event of a voting machine failure.



“We cannot allow the American people to lose faith in the most fundamental aspect of our democratic system – the right to vote,” Feingold said. “Some of the problems we saw this year, like voters in Maryland being told to come back later because the machines weren’t working, are simply unacceptable. A back-up plan as simple as having emergency paper ballots on hand is essential to preventing election day disasters.”



Kerry said, “It’s a disgrace that a Congress and an Administration which talks about exporting democracy around the world ignores the challenges of our own democracy right here at home. We have seen American citizens disenfranchised in our elections for the simple reason that no effective back up system was in place. That’s a national scandal. But here we are, 42 days away from another election, and Congress has again dragged its feet even after we mobilized 35,000 citizens to demand a hearing for our Count Every Vote Act, even after what we saw just this month in Montgomery County. We need emergency action now. That is why I am co-sponsoring the Dodd-Boxer legislation to provide emergency paper ballots and that is why Russ Feingold and I are introducing our resolution today demanding election day back-up plans. We have a duty to ensure that no citizen will be denied the right to vote in 2006.”



Feingold and Kerry are also co-sponsoring legislation with Senators Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Christopher Dodd (D-CT) to help states make paper ballots available in case of election day problems with electronic voting machines. Feingold and Kerry introduced the resolution ahead of Congress’ adjournment for the 2006 elections. With the problems some voters have already experienced during primary elections this year, the senators believe the Senate should be on record supporting state efforts to be prepared in the event of problems on Election Day. Earlier this month, problems with new voting technology were reported in a number of primaries around the country.



A copy of the resolution can be found here. http://feingold.senate.gov/FeingoldKerry_Sense_of_the_S...



###



Liz Richardson

Deputy Press Secretary

Senator John Kerry

(202) 224-4159

http://kerry.senate.gov
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
INdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is great but I have a problem with this
Obviously we had problems in 2004.So why wait and introduce this resolution 30 odd days before this election..This doesn't give states time to put in place a back-up system
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
INdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. What was that for...
Congress has had two years to fix the voting system..This should have been a priority right after the election was stolen in 2004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaukraut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. unfortunately, repubs control congress
and it wasn't in their best interest to fix the voting system. Not surprisingly, the only bills that were ever introduced were those that disenfranchised voters even more. Lets hope that the Boxer/Dodd emergency bill in conjunction with the Feingold/Kerry resolution will be successful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I believe it is because of all the problems in the primaries
that are finally sending the message home.

Better late than never.

Especially look at what they are trying to do in Florida, read here:

Paper ballot question for Sarasota question appealed by state, thanks to seafan

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x450977
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Ahhhhh maybe not, this seems in support of the Boxer Dodd bill
There is plenty of time to print paper ballots, to be used on Nov. 7th.

Its about winning in 2006. Its about the PR management too, make the COns look bad just before the election. I got out of my election reform mode months ago, now its time to..

TAKE THE HILL ! ! !

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarcoated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Will they be able to get this passed in time?
And, will the pukes allow it to even get anywhere?

Good point that it would, politically, make pukes look bad if they opposed this before the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrioticliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Of course not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Passed in two days?
Uh,no. Boehner says Congress will adjourn for the campaigns day after tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Easy form to support Emergency Paper Ballots.
http://www.truemajority.org

"Paperless electronic voting machines will be used once again this fall, and already during the primaries they failed. In Maryland crowds of legal voters were turned away from the polls when the machines couldn't be started.

There's a simple safeguard - have enough paper ballots on hand so the election can go forward even if the machines let us down again. Obvious, right? Senators Boxer (D-CA) and Dodd (D-CT) have introduced a last-minute bill which would provide money to any state that is willing to print up the paper ballots."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. With timing like that.....
nebbamind.. can't say anything about the sainted Kerry

Shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I can
WTF???

Why not wait until the night before? After all, whats the rush??

This is the stupidest fucking thing I've heard. I'm going to wake up now and realize it was a bad dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. What about sainted Feingold?
Or are you going to conveniently ignore that this is his bill, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Oh, ever so kindly put.
What do you assume I think about Feingold, since you obviously are much smarter?

Nebbamind, this was all about one-upping, wasn't it???

WHOEVER IS BEHIND THIS, IT'S JUST PLAIN STTOOOOOOOPID!!!

OK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. Gee, maybe because you singled out Kerry?
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. Damned right. HE was the one who threw in the towels within hours.
AFTER collecting big bucks from people to "fight the election results".

THAT was KERRY.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. You talk but all I hear is bla bla bla....
:eyes: Same ol shit, day after day after day...

Like a broken record.....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. We finally have a crew of senators taking this up and still the guns
Edited on Wed Sep-27-06 04:43 PM by blm
point at the hated Kerry.

Sorry he doesn't curl up and melt away for some of you people - guess he's still just TOO COMMITTED to trying to make a difference in the world for the better. And too busy working to bring justice into the worl of the corrupt and to open government up to people who cheer against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #19
33. And still those who will support him no matter what, and rather than
Edited on Wed Sep-27-06 08:42 PM by bobbolink
understand the anger some of us have (from being terribly hurt and let down, I might add), you'd rather make it personal and vilify us.

Way to unite the party, pard!

You may want to take note that I expressed my distrust of Kerry, not his supporters.

But, you chose to come back at me personally.

Just out of curiosity, do you reallly think that's gonna win me over to Kerry's "team"? Do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. I am speaking to a general "you" who treat a senator with Kerry's record
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 10:30 AM by blm
as if he is unworthy of any respect.


And I hope you save some of your hurt and direct your anger at the actual villains of what went down in 2004 - Kerry did his part and WON the election. The DNC was charged for FOUR YEARS with the duty of securing the voting infrastructure for Democratic voters and candidates in every state.

Instead, the DNC oversaw a weakened party infrastructure that was collapsed for the most part in crucial states, and that did nothing to counter the 4yr efforts of the RNC machine working to suppress Dem votes, purge voter rolls and rig machines all over the country.. The Dem party infrastructure was too weak to SUSTAIN a Dem victory earned by the candidate.

There is no AFTER with voting machines - they need securing BEFORE the vote as rigged machines are set up for onetime use and then erased and untraceable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohtransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'll take any positive step from any good Dem.
Good on you Senators!

Timing? If Rs really believe in fair elections, like they say they do, why not support this legislation? Is it more urgent to give * the keys to the torture room?

Do we always have to let them set the agenda? Is there nothing to be said for taking them off their game?

In addition, these are long-term battles. If Rs oppose these bills as expected it further exposes them as the hypocrites they are - on the eve of another election. Sometimes timing is about finding an "opportune" time...IMHO.

Go Kerry!

Go Feingold!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
15. Not good enough
Why not have paper ballots on hand
for anyone not wanting to use a machine.

My guess is the machines wouldn't get many hits on election day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaukraut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. That's what they're asking for
Both the Kerry/Feingold resolution and the Boxer/Dodd emergency bill is demanding precicely that - backup paper ballots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. In case of emergency
I want it in lew of machines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaukraut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. That's not feasible short term, hence the emergency bill
calling for paper ballots made available to voters in case of machine failure. Getting rid of the machines altogether is something that will take a lot longer and will be met with great resistance. So that particular fight will have to be fought with a long term goal in mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. So I guess you want to vote on a machine again.
Because you trust them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaukraut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Where did I say that?
No, I would not vote on a voting machine if I had the option of a paper ballot instead. I don't trust the machines at all, but I also realize that getting a bill passed in a republican congress that would essentially get rid of the machines completely is not doable at this juncture. It must be a long term goal, though. I believe I stated that already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarcoated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
17. Yes, maybe the last minute thing is a strategy
If they introduced earlier, maybe it would have been buired and forgotten about like other voting bills before it. Maybe, just maybe it's a manuever? Something they can use against pukes in the run up to the election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Or anticipated by the republicons and checked.
I just hope Kerry/Feingold/Boxer/Dodd are as smart as I think they are, and have a strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarcoated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. If it's a stategy
and the pukes do check them in the next two days there better be WALL TO WALL Democrats and Dem advocates telling the voters from now till election day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. We'll know soon enough. We're going to know a lot of things soon enough.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. i think they used to call this a "get well bill"
look like you are doing something that your constituents care about, even though you have no plan to make it happen. or even when the plan is to do it in a way where it can't happen. but you get to go out and say, oh those bad guys wouldn't let me. the last minute is especially good for this kind of thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. You tell em
:eyes:

I'm sure you'd be such an exemplary Senator and despite a Republican majority, you would single-handedly manage to pass universal health care, verified paper ballots, and universal fair trade all in one session.

:eyes: :eyes: :eyes:

Cynicism is an ugly trait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Cynicism is an ugly trait.
pity it is so useful these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. got that right! Most people *are* cynical now. That's why many
don't vote.

We can choose to look at it, and understand it, or we can so self-righteously attack "cynical" people and look down our patrician noses at them.

"pity it is so useful these days"

You're so right. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC