Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republican Lindsay Graham speaking against habeas corpus...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:33 PM
Original message
Republican Lindsay Graham speaking against habeas corpus...
..on the Senate floor now.

Just said that the military should determine if a prisoner is a combatant, and civilian judges can't make that judgement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. astounding, isn't it. . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Lindsay Graham just added that prisoners shouldn't be able
...to sue over mistreatment.

Lindsay Graham is agaisnst human rights.

The whole rebel-Republican thing for standing up to Bush on an issue (and then caving) is bogus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. Lindsay is one of the more flexible republicans
He was for habeus corpus before he was against it. Just like he was against impeachment before he was for it. He knows the difference between right and wrong, but he''s willing to overlook it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why is it a bad thing to give a detainee, after detention,
the right to ask a court why he is being held?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Terrorist loving pinko-commie-socialist liberal!
:rofl: Why do you hate America? Could it be SATAN? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Only the military should get to decide, according to Lindsay Graham. NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Because! That's giving the "bad people" rights!
Bad People want to HURT YOU! Anyone who argues that a "bad person" deserves rights, like a fair trial, is a Bad People Lover and Probably a Bad People, themselves!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
27. LET ME! LET ME! ooh-ooh, I want to answer this one!
Because...um...if you are innocent...then...um...uh...then you wouldn't be detained. And if...uh...if you are detained...uhhhh...then you are...ummm...are....uh...not innocent!

Is that right? :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. I suspect more and more every day that they are just setting things
into motion so they can arrest and torture dissenters without ever having to charge them or give them a trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. as much as I would like to think otherwise, I agree
or at the very least, they are setting it up as a backup plan in case things get ugly and we try to actually throw the bums out when they refuse to leave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Anyone who runs for office against a Repub is a terrorist
and will be arrested
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. I've been thinking
the same thing ComerPerro. I get more depressed each day reading some of the days events.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dem2theMax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
29. Bingo.
Can my rubber raft make it all the way to Italy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. there are lawsuits against Bush*co!!! Nooooo can't have that, do we
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. God forbid that our laws are enforced through lawsuits.
Better that our laws are violated (sarcasm.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. So Graham advocates military rule rather than civilian rule of law?
Graham took an oath to defend the Constitution, time to resign your commission and your seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Specter is questioning Graham now
Edited on Wed Sep-27-06 04:45 PM by LSK
Specter will not let it go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveOurDemocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. Ahhhhhhhh yes, there's the old Lindsay...

... Graham we all knew and LOATHED during the Clinton Rethug Impeachment witch-hunt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. The powers that be threatened him again with that skeleton in his closet.
Or better put, that "closet" in his closet.;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. Overlooking the obvious
This is not a conventional war and the military is not in a position to correctly determine whether these men are enemy combatants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveOurDemocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. This is a statutory problem..

... NOT a constitutional problem ... according to Lindsay Graham.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. Is Specter putting up a fight?
He just asked Graham "what do you do about the Constitutional 'invasion or public rebellion' language"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. yes he is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. my head is spinning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
16. I knew it, I knew it, I knew it! Just look at his face, it's all in there.
What a nasty turd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
20. Now Lindsay Graham is saying: Don't worry...
...the military will provide all the review that's needed. No need to let a judge look at whether someone is beng held lawfully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. I don't want the military to have
that kind of power. What the fuck is wrong with these scumbags. The Nazi's had that kind of power, that scares the shit out of me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
22. Warner can go cram it with walnuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
26. Graham needs to go back to racking balls for a living
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1535846-3,00.html

>>>Making his own way is nothing new for Graham. He grew up in the rooms behind the Sanitary Cafe, a pool hall, bar and liquor store that his parents owned in Central, S.C. Graham's father, known as Dude, tended bar for the millworker clientele; the future Senator racked balls and answered phones.<<<
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC