|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 04:33 PM Original message |
Republican Lindsay Graham speaking against habeas corpus... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
1. astounding, isn't it. . . . n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 04:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Lindsay Graham just added that prisoners shouldn't be able |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pscot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 05:23 PM Response to Reply #1 |
28. Lindsay is one of the more flexible republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joemurphy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
2. Why is it a bad thing to give a detainee, after detention, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 04:40 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Terrorist loving pinko-commie-socialist liberal! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 04:42 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Only the military should get to decide, according to Lindsay Graham. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 04:46 PM Response to Reply #2 |
15. Because! That's giving the "bad people" rights! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 05:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
27. LET ME! LET ME! ooh-ooh, I want to answer this one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
3. I suspect more and more every day that they are just setting things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unpossibles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 04:44 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. as much as I would like to think otherwise, I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 04:48 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Anyone who runs for office against a Repub is a terrorist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jimshoes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 05:05 PM Response to Reply #3 |
24. I've been thinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dem2theMax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 05:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
29. Bingo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BelgianMadCow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
4. there are lawsuits against Bush*co!!! Nooooo can't have that, do we |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 04:44 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. God forbid that our laws are enforced through lawsuits. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Garbo 2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
9. So Graham advocates military rule rather than civilian rule of law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
10. Specter is questioning Graham now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveOurDemocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
12. Ahhhhhhhh yes, there's the old Lindsay... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 04:54 PM Response to Reply #12 |
23. The powers that be threatened him again with that skeleton in his closet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
13. Overlooking the obvious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveOurDemocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 04:49 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. This is a statutory problem.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
14. Is Specter putting up a fight? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 04:47 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. yes he is! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 04:49 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. my head is spinning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
16. I knew it, I knew it, I knew it! Just look at his face, it's all in there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
20. Now Lindsay Graham is saying: Don't worry... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jimshoes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 05:10 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. I don't want the military to have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
22. Warner can go cram it with walnuts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-27-06 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
26. Graham needs to go back to racking balls for a living |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC