Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

C'mon We Haven't Lost A War, We've WON A Police State

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 09:17 PM
Original message
C'mon We Haven't Lost A War, We've WON A Police State
The New York Times disclosure of an official National Intelligence Estimate, which states that the Iraq invasion has worsened the global terrorist threat, carries an unspoken subtext – that the Bush administration is either woefully ignorant of how to combat terrorism or finds the terrorist threat a useful tool for managing the American public.

<snip>

Although the Iraq War has cost about 2,700 American lives and hundreds of billions of dollars from the Treasury, the war has created great business opportunities for well-connected corporations such as Halliburton and Bechtel, which have registered substantial profits from the occupation and “rebuilding” of Iraq.

Also, although U.S. intelligence agencies now agree that the terrorist threat has ballooned due to the Iraq War, the Bush administration has found the conflict useful in simultaneously expanding its powers, abrogating constitutional rights and justifying more government secrecy.

Those trends seem likely to continue – and even accelerate – as the “war on terror” remains a powerful excuse for transforming the United States from a historically free and open society to a frightened nation where citizens eagerly trade their constitutional rights for government promises of more security.

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2006/092606a.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think the conflict was planned for this purpose
"...the Bush administration has found the conflict useful in simultaneously expanding its powers, abrogating constitutional rights and justifying more government secrecy..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Same here
war on terror is serving it's purpose. Rationalization for bloated Pentagon budget and increased tension and suppression on the domestic front. That's for starters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I would agree without hesitation.
Edited on Wed Sep-27-06 09:23 PM by acmejack
They have planned this since the seventies. Perhaps before. Cunningly conceived and executed, we have witnessed the plan come to fruition, the oligarchy is now firmly in control. The rest of this is mere formalities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I somehow think it started way before the 70s
I don't know how far I'd go back with it. I know some trace certain trends to the creation of the Federal Reserve and some even before that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Further
back than that. One could easily make the case for this being a European import dated to 1513 but let us just tag it concretely to the advent of industrialism and capital accumulation in the mid to late 1800's. Industrial schooling ensued.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I'm sure
all that was just accidental, kinda collateral damage>:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aaronbees Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I agree ... I don't think BushCo ever intended to "win" this war
Rather, they'd love to perpetuate it to maintain an "enemy" and thereby control the populace. What they're aiming for is chaos they can control and riches they can rob.


Here's a chilling quote from the excellent article in the OP:

'But Gardiner points out that not making sense won’t limit what the Bush administration does. “The ‘making sense’ filter was not applied over the past four years for Iraq, and it is unlikely to be applied in evaluating whether to attack Iran,” Gardiner writes.'


As far as I'm concerned that lack of a filter is the starting point for evaluating everything this administration does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. The "Mission Accomplished" banner was the truth.
That accomplished HIS mission in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I agree. I also think "Brownie, you did a heckuva job" was the truth
for junior. They wanted a flooded NOLA, which is why they let the levees break and overflow even though they knew Monday night that the levees had been breached.

Watching Studio 60 Monday, I was struck by the comedy writers trying to come up with a way to lampoon Bush's way of naming a bill for the opposite of what it does (like "The Clean Air Act"). The key to this administration is to look at what the administration is saying and assume they mean the opposite or that they mean what they say in a way that a decent person would never intend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Kind of sad, eh?
But the People are starting to figure it out. Sloooooowly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. God yes, it's sad! And I hope you are right about people figuring it out
I am not so sanguine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aaronbees Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Exactly on that "key"
Also, another handy key to their shenanigans is that anything they accuse others of doing is what they themselves are practicing. (For example, when the administration accuses the Dems of politicizing 9/11, etc.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yes! Agreed!
Is there a list of these things somewhere? It would be nice to have a neocon to English dictionary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. That would sell!
And Orwell's 1984 could work as a primer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Making sense? They create their own reality, remember?
Those of us who recognize torture for what it is are part of the reality based community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC