Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Olbermann on threat letter, reply to NY Post: MSNBC transcript and video

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:41 AM
Original message
Olbermann on threat letter, reply to NY Post: MSNBC transcript and video
Olbermann: Threatening letter no joke
“Countdown” host Keith Olbermann received a suspicious letter filled with white powder, and the New York Post reported the incident despite the FBI’s request to keep it quiet. Olbermann responds.

COMMENTARY
By Keith Olbermann
Anchor, 'Countdown'
MSNBC
Sept 27, 2006

The Rupert Murdoch-owned newspaper, The New York Post, may have just impeded an FBI investigation into terroristic threats.

I know this because I was a recipient.

The Bureau asked us not to report any of the details so that the person or persons responsible would not know any of the threats had been received by any of the targets -- and we of course complied.

I still cannot confirm many of the specifics -- again in order to make the jobs of the FBI and the New York Police Department a little easier. But I find it necessary to respond to the genuinely shocking tone with which Murdoch's paper reported the event, and the string of factual errors they made either through negligence or a premeditated disregard for the truth.

“Powder Puff Spooks Keith," reads the headline. The article then gives the details of the event which we were asked not to divulge....

TRANSCRIPT AND VIDEO AT LINK: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15036633/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. keep kicked
kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. It was a masterpiece....Please help put this on the "Greatest Page"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Happy to oblige. K&R. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is quite a story, way to go NYP! Get a clue! kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
watrwefitinfor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
29. Please excuse my rudeness of jumping in like this, but this MUST be asked:
(Just felt compelled to get this question where it would be seen.)

If people are told to help the investigation by not telling anyone when something like this happens, HOW MANY HAVE BEEN TARGETED and never said anything about it? How do we know this has not happened repeatedly? Could it be anonymous letters with powder that helps keep so many pundits (and maybe politicians) in line?

Wat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelliebrat Donating Member (162 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #29
35. Good question
it sounded like Keith wasnt the only one to get one of these threats. I am curious to find out who else has gotten them, and would bet my ass that Billow and Limbaugh aint on the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thoreau-Ly Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #29
41. And, Clearly on the Last Point.
The timing of the letters received by Daschle and Leahy, if one performs a modicum of research, is at the very least quite suspicious.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Gauger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #41
49. What had the two said before they got attacked?
I don't remember anything about them at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. they said they were going to stop the patriot act nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thoreau-Ly Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #50
55. Found a Relevant Reputable Excerpt
It happens like clockwork these days: A significant piece of legislation comes before Congress that was ostensibly drafted to help defend the nation against terrorism. Line items within the legislation do away with previously sacrosanct personal freedoms outlined within the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Should said legislation pass, the power of the federal government to arrest and detain citizens without trial or access to attorney, to search private homes without warrant or notice, to tap telephone and computer communications, and to keep vital information secreted away from the eyes of the public, would be greatly enhanced.

In the days leading up to the mandated Congressional debate regarding said legislation, terror warnings suddenly bloom like nightshade. The White House or the FBI or the CIA, or all three in concert, ratchet up the national tension level with forecasts of doom and death and fire from unknown quarters. Said legislation passes without so much as leaving a wake in its path, nothing explodes, and everyone goes on with their lives in the belief that they just narrowly dodged a bullet. At the conclusion of the process, the foundations of American freedom have been redacted, edited, clipped and round-filed.

The PATRIOT Act was passed in such a fashion. When that bill came up, the entire country was collecting its mail with oven mitts on to avoid exposure to anthrax, despite the fact that Democratic Senators like Patrick Leahy and Tom Daschle were the intended targets of this assassination attempt. The media got its dose of the poison, ensuring that all publicly aired conversation regarding the legislation would be coated with a veneer of hysteria. All of us were going to get 'thraxed, and so let us pass this ruinously contra-constitutional legislation without even reading it. I'd bet some serious folding green that many of the Senators who voted the thing into existence a year ago still haven't read it.


You know Pitt. He can lead to you more research, but also gives questions and suppositions great force with his writing.

http://www.alternet.org/story/14576/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #49
91. Daschle refused bushco's wishes for ultimate power.
Less than three weeks later, he was sent anthrax.

From the WP:

Power We Didn't Grant
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/22/AR2005122201101.html
On the evening of Sept. 12, 2001, the White House proposed that Congress authorize the use of military force to "deter and pre-empt any future acts of terrorism or aggression against the United States." Believing the scope of this language was too broad and ill defined, Congress chose instead, on Sept. 14, to authorize "all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations or persons determines planned, authorized, committed or aided" the attacks of Sept. 11. With this language, Congress denied the president the more expansive authority he sought and insisted that his authority be used specifically against Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda.

Just before the Senate acted on this compromise resolution, the White House sought one last change. Literally minutes before the Senate cast its vote, the administration sought to add the words "in the United States and" after "appropriate force" in the agreed-upon text. This last-minute change would have given the president broad authority to exercise expansive powers not just overseas -- where we all understood he wanted authority to act -- but right here in the United States, potentially against American citizens. I could see no justification for Congress to accede to this extraordinary request for additional authority. I refused.


I'm sure it's only a coincidence.:sarcasm:

Odd, bushco seems to have forgotten the anthrax when they say, "There have been no attacks since 9/11."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #41
53. At the very least indeed especially considering just a week
or so before such letters were received the entire Whitehouse was given the antidote for Anthrax and never again. Only on that time was the Whitehouse given Cipro and low and behold a week later Congress was attacked by Anthrax. What a coincidence don't you think? The Whitehouse has never again wanted to give anyone an antidote for Anthrax. Only a week before the attack..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jawja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #29
57. Of course.
Remember whose offices got the Anthrax? Dan Rather and Tom Brokow. The media was definitely targeted and apparently blackmailed into submission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #29
76. Many, many people are certainly ACTING like they've been
threatened. It would explain a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. kickin' for Keith...
(kick)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. How did the NYP get the details?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 05:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. Probably some wingnut working at the hospital tipped them off.
It does sound like Keith's not the first to get these letters and that this is an ongoing investigation. Nice work there New York Post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. My guess is some freeper sent it and gave the NYPost a heads up. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texifornia Donating Member (399 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. Why?
Does Rupert Murdoch hate America?

New meme: Pro-Terrorism NY Post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
58. That is what I wanted to know. Not only is his media empire
pro-terrorist but it is also a total right wing shill. And he is not even a citizen of the US. He reminds me of Herod who played footsy with the roman empire in order to keep his power base in Israel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. kcik
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
9. The New York Post leaked confidential info
and laughed at Keith. Since they are a right wing group, they will face no fines or sanctions. Our government, under W, only protects the right wingers. The rest of us are chopped liver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
10. NY Post Forgot About The Anthrax Terrorist?
Well why not, BushCo did!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
exlrrp Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
38. No, they RECEIVED one of the Anthrax letters
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 09:11 AM by exlrrp
How could they "forget" that?
They did this deliberately after receving a genuine anthrax letter.
(I think the RW yahoo who sent it mixed them up with the NY Times)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #38
64. But if they remembered...
why would they go out of their way to make fun of K.O., who didn't even go public with this? Nobody should receive this kind of scare in the mail....they're sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #38
82. don't think NYPost got an anthrax letter
in addition to recipients mentioned earlier, a grocery store tabloid that printed some negative info about Bush twins also got anthrax letter.....I think someone who worked there may have died
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #82
86. The National Enquirer got an anthrax letter
Their photo editor died as a result.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
11. And this sentence summarizes it all:
"Endorsement of terroristic threats from the Radical Right.."

Their position couldn't have been plainer.

That, and what he suggested about how quickly they arrived upon the story themselves and reported the incident, almost as if there was some foreknowledge.

I imagine there's a little less drunken snark tonite and a quite a bit more sober consulting with the paper's legal department right about now...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
28. How they knew and when they knew is a major question. Sounds
like October is starting early this year!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
12. He's an amazing man.
That is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
13. The New York Post should be contacted at their laughter
at Olbermann, the FBI, and our police services. Evidently since they are owned by Faux/Murdoch, they think they are above the law and backed by the Bushco regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
14. Short, polite, and damning.
And they called Reagan the great communicator. Certainly a misnomer by comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
15. The RW enables terrorism for a living.
I doubt there will be accountability but one can always hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. and uses the same technique... fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
17. There go the right-wingers again. Impeding another investigation.
I say you put the NY Post top on the list of suspects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
20. Rupert Murdoch supports terrorists
:kick:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
21. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
22. Their reasons for hating KO are simple.
He is a better man.

He is a better journalist.

He is a better American.

And most of all, these RW sickos hate and fear KO because he tells the truth.


May we all take pride in having their hatred and pettiness thrown our way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:04 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. I wouldn't be surprised if the letter come from someone in this
administration.. Rove maybe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:21 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Nah, more than likely just a true devotee of Der Chimperor
Prototypical freeper fanatic, knuckles scarred from the sidewalk and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
24. His writing is just genius. So subtle, yet forceful. Murdoch should be
ashamed of himself after everyone teamed together to help protect his FOX employee who was being held hostage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alteredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
25. Kicked
and recommended!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alteredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
27. Here's what they had to say at the "Olbermann Watch" site
"Oddball preceded another episode of Attack the Media. It was time to slam the "Rupert Murdoch owned" New York Post. This was all about the scare that was reported today, and the "shocking" way the paper wrote it up. KO gave a self-aggrandizing version of the events, disputing the paper's claim that he insisted a check-up at the hospital. He asserts it was all the doing of the police officers, and he wanted to leave the hospital but they wouldn't let him. Then, in a classic bit of OlbySpin, he slammed the Post for:

...its endorsement of terroristic threats from the radical right.
So KO knows who sent him the suspicious package? He knows it came from the "radical right"? Why doesn't he have the guy arrested? In the Anthrax attacks, despite messages that appeared to emanate from radical Islamists, investigators have been looking elsewhere, because it is not uncommon for such messages to be red herrings. But Swami Olbermann Knows All and Sees All. Maybe he should name the sender as "worst person".

Then Keith "Man on Fan" Olbermann was off on another tear. The paper sides with terrorists, not the FBI. No newspaper should have printed this, despite Murdoch's "radical agenda". Mr Humility wrapped this unbilled "special comment" with:

At this end anyway we are still human beings and Americans. And we would never have any problem choosing whether to support the terrorists or the FBI.
Yeah, Olby always supports law enforcement over the terrorists (NSA surveillance, Patriot Act, sneering at "purported" plots...). Gag. Moving along: Terrell Owens, Anna Nicole Smith, Steve Irwin. #1: The sex tapes of D-list celebrities."

http://www.olbermannwatch.com/archives/2006/09/countdown_with_128.html#more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. LOL!
He knows it came from the "radical right"? Why doesn't he have the guy arrested? The radical right is comprised of one guy? :crazy: What a moran!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #27
42. And then there's THIS asshole
http://radioequalizer.blogspot.com/2006/09/keith-olbermann-msnbc-ksco-santa-cruz.html

...we'd never put it past Olbermann and his lefty friends to try and score partisan points over such a story.

Of course, Brian Baloney wants people to elicit more sympathy over his failed radio career (he claimed KIRO in Seattle fired him from his Sunday afternoon gig two years ago for badmouthing Dan Rather, but they actually dropped him for Seahawks football) than for a terrorist attack.

Fuck him and the horse he rode in on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #27
45. (way more text than I needed from that terrorist site). . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerstin Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #27
71. What the execrable "olbermannwatch" fails to mention:
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 02:01 PM by kerstin
The Anthrax sent to Daschle, etc., in the wake of 9/11 was traced to an American military facility.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #27
95. Holy Shit! McCarthy is reaching out from the grave!
Olbermann watch?! :rofl:

Yes, maroons, by all means monitor one of the best & brightest journalists to have lived in the last 100 years--you may learn something (then again, prolly not)

We all know how dangerous you creatins believe facts are. BOO!!

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:













Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
31. K&R read tonight
Thanx for the vid link. Had time to watch it, amazing our Keith is.
off to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truth2power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
32. From the transcript...
"It's interesting too that Murdoch's paper was able to get a jump on this story so quickly -- nearly as quickly, as if they'd known it was coming."

I would say that's a safe bet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
33. !
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
34. Keith just shines above the rest
The rest just make me want to :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arger68 Donating Member (562 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
36. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
37. The reason that "they" don't want this leaked...
...is because it makes Republicans look bad.

This is an election year. Many people are losing faith in Republicans
and in the pResident. Junior's snarky, powermongering, petulant attitude
is wearing thin on people.

Everyone smells the corruption and lies. The GOP is a hair's breath away
from imploding. We at DU know the truth, and there is a significant percentage
that suspects it. News like this would solidify and reinforce the TRUTH about
this evil administration.

They must keep their crimes under wraps. Cover at all costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #37
43. richard.johnson@nypost.com
Yep. That's the email address of the man with the byline.

I'm not suggesting you email him. Nope. Not at all. Don't do it.

richard.johnson@nypost.com

POWDER PUFF SPOOKS KEITH



September 27, 2006 -- MSNBC loudmouth Keith Olbermann flipped out when he opened his home mail yesterday. The acerbic host of "Countdown with Keith Olbermann" was terrified when he opened a suspicious-looking letter with a California postmark and a batch of white powder poured out. A note inside warned Olbermann, who's a frequent critic of President Bush's policies, that it was payback for some of his on-air shtick. The caustic commentator panicked and frantically called 911 at about 12:30 a.m., sources told The Post's Philip Messing. An NYPD HazMat unit rushed to Olbermann's pad on Central Park South, but preliminary tests indicated the substance was harmless soap powder. However, that wasn't enough to satisfy Olbermann, who insisted on a checkup. He asked to be taken to St. Luke's Hospital, where doctors looked him over and sent him home. Whether they gave him a lollipop on the way out isn't known. Olbermann had no comment.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/09272006/gossip/pagesix/powder_puff_spooks_keith_pagesix_.htm


Please don't email:

richard.johnson@nypost.com
or
pfroelich@nypost.com
or
bhoffman@nypost.com

They are too busy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #43
51. email delivery blocked. How do you spell "chicken shit"?
I emailed Richard Johnson a rational, reasonable but critical message. Delivery was blocked.

So much for accountability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #51
59. Mine was not so rational but I think it got through. I e-mailed all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Castleman Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #43
63. This was what I wrote to the buffoon
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 11:37 AM by Castleman
I tittled my e-mail "Nice Expose"

"Of the craven, cowardly and treasonous policies endorsed by your paper.
This time though, you picked on the wrong guy.
That's right, you took a potshot at Keith Olbermann.
Did you think he'd just take it?
You thought wrong. He's not afraid to tell Americans the truth about Bush and his criminal cronies. If he doesn't back down from real criminals and thugs like Cheney, Bush, etc, he's not going to back down from the likes of you.
So your attempt to slam him for some cowardly pile of garbage trying to scare or threaten him only makes you look stupider yet. The FBI says to keep it quiet, so you blab your obviously made up story about Keith panicking (Yeah, right, Mr. Cool is NEVER going to panic.), and interfere with an FBI investigation to try and score some cheap political points by dissing a true American?
I mean, wow, INTERFERING WITH AN FBI INVESTIGATION INTO A POSSIBLE TERRORIST THREAT? Isn't that, well, UN-American?
That's it in a nutshell.
Your second rate little scandal sheet shows their true colors, and that they are indeed, a fraudulent pathetic shill for the criminals in charge of this nation.
As for yourself, sir, maybe just a wee bit envious of Keith's success, popularity, talent, etc?
Loudmouth?
No.
Patriot.
Journalist.
Integrity.
Class.
THOSE are the words used to describe Olbermann.
They'll never be used to describe you.
Have a splendid day!"

These weasels get sleazier, and slimier every day....but it's just the last ditch efforts to prevent the true Americans from reclaiming our country in November...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bretttido Donating Member (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #63
70. Great Letter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I Have A Dream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #63
83. Yeah!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PegDAC Donating Member (906 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #63
87. Castleman shoots, Castleman scores!!
Your letter is sheer masterpiece!

:toast: :thumbsup: :headbang: :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mntleo2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #43
96. Sent This To Froelich Yesterday
On purpose btw, I spelled "liars" as "liers", meaning something that stays "horizonal" or "to have sexual intercourse" according to the Webster-Marriam dictionary.

Subject: Can Email Contain Antrax?

Paula:

I guess you thought it was a real yuk-em-up situation that a journalist would recieve a possible anthrax infested piece of snail mail, like this email could never be. I find it interesting how wingnut rag writers don't seem to be very afraid of anthrax infestation. They all think it is a big joke. Huh, odd isn't it? A lot of people think this is VERY odd, don't you? I mean, why wouldn't you be afraid ~ unless you know who is doing it and that you could never be a target ...hmmmm, interesting thought, isn't it?

We all know the truth about people like you, don't we Paula? "Journalists" like you get paid for unbuttoning the truth, stripping your integrity while suggestively licking your words about the masochistic, sick liers and torturers in this administration. I hope you get paid well for tongue-kissing the assets of those wingnut rich people, while supporting greedy warmongers who are unzipping their files and watching you willingly get down on all fours for treasonous war profiteers' erect bank accounts. All this while taking every inch of it all in to the hilt in order to keep people from the truth. I am sure you moan with fake pleasure as they release their skank into your ignorant little mind.

Really Paula, admit it, you are jealous of Olbermann, after all he is a REAL journalist with REAL integrity who is not afraid to tell the truth. So, if I were you, I wouldn't worry too much about getting in trouble for killing innocent people with anthrax like your friends ~ oops I mean your "contacts" do. We know you get paid to lie to the American people and perpetuate it. Must feel real good to be a team player for rags like the one you work for who are responsible for the murder of millions in wars made over lies and the like, huh?

In short, you have to live up to your REAL self by laughing at the anthrax you will certainly never have to worry about, huh? This is because you are so special. We The People however, would rather have people of high journalistic intregrity who don't have to fake or lie about the news, which you could never come close: There is a pet name we like to use for those like you, many of us who are made physically ill by your "humor": It begins with "Wh" and rhymes with a big "bore".

Disgustedly,

Cat In Seattle

CC'd all over the Internet yuk, yuk, yuk!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
39. Amazing
I can't even begin to imagine the depravity of some people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladym55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
40. Rupert and his Snarkies strike again
I heard Olbermann last night discussing what happened. I'm sure that if THIS had happened to someone at the Post or to Limpballs or O'Lielly there would have been hysteria, screaming, and janitorial staff busily cleaning up the excrement the heros left behind when they first opened the envelope.

The venom from the right keeps kicking it up just another notch--more hate, more sneering, more snark. How despicable. And of course the patriots at the Post care more about spreading hatred than support a terrorist investigation.

And it does make it look suspicious that the Post knew SO many details ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
44. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
46. KIck (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
47. THIS HAS GOT TO STOP
This newspaper can't report any of the vital news and the Iraq War but they can go out of their way to do something like this.

No wonder Murdoch's children are trying to have him certified as incompetent. And It is about time the rest of the country started writing letters and overwhelming these people with our opinions of their trashing actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
48. Olbermann is a bigger man than me. I would have been less kind. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
52. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Homer Wells Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
54. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
56. Email address for the editor in charge of the column:
scuozzo@nypost.com

Apparently, the author of the article is not accepting email at this time. (Bummer -- a banker in Nigeria has been trying to contact him about a $15,000,000 opportunity.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trekbiker Donating Member (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #56
65. kick'n for KO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
civildisoBDence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #56
66. Is that SCUZZO@nypost.com?
What a scuzzbag. They'll probably have to change the address now...

Newsprism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
60. Sen. Mark Dayton closed offices 10/04


http://summeroftruth.org/oct_12_2004_sen.html

"WASHINGTON - A Democratic senator said Tuesday he has closed his Washington office because a top-secret intelligence report made him fear for his staff's safety. Federal law enforcement officials insisted there is no new intelligence indicating the Capitol complex is a target.
Sen. Mark Dayton (news, bio, voting record), D-Minn., said his office in the Russell Senate Office Building across the street from the Capitol will be closed while Congress is in recess through Election Day, with his staff working out of his Minnesota office and in Senate space off Capitol Hill.
"I take this step out of extreme, but necessary, precaution to protect the lives and safety of my Senate staff and my Minnesota constituents, who might otherwise be visiting my Senate office in the next three weeks," he said.
Dayton said he could not give details of the intelligence report, which he said Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., presented to senators at a briefing two weeks ago.
Frist told reporters later that he didn't know of any other senator who had closed their Capitol Hill office.
"There has been no new information over the last five to six weeks," he said, referring to intelligence.
Brian Roehrkasse, a Homeland Security Department spokesman, said the department had no intelligence indicating al-Qaida intends to target any specific U.S. locations.
FBI (news - web sites) officials said while there still is concern al-Qaida wants to disrupt the upcoming election, there is no new information indicating the Capitol or any other location is a target.
Added Capitol police spokesman Michael Lauer: "There's been no specific threats against the Capitol complex. We continue to be on guard now, all the way up to the election and all the way through the inauguration."
Nonetheless, Dayton said he would advise people from his home state to avoid Capitol Hill until after the Nov. 2 election.

"I would not bring my two sons to the Capitol between now and the election," he added."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #60
62. Suspicious letter a NYT (AP)date July 14, 2006
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/07/14/national/main1807018.shtml

"A suspicious powdery substance found Friday in an envelope in the mailroom at The New York Times likely is cornstarch, the newspaper said.

Police were called to the newspaper's West 43rd Street offices around 12:30 p.m. after an employee in the mailroom opened a business-sized envelope containing a suspicious-looking beige powder.

The Department of Environmental Protection, through field tests, preliminarily identified the substance as cornstarch, said Catherine Mathis, a Times spokeswoman.

The envelope also contained an editorial about reports on secret government anti-terrorism programs with a red "X" through it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PegDAC Donating Member (906 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #60
88. Remember Paul Wellstone! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
61. I suspect Murdoch's ...
minions are responsible for the threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #61
90. Or in the very least, the senser called them&told them what he did
Instead of warning KO, they just snickered like fratboys aboyt a prank...Who does this remind me of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
67. I don't understand this
According to O'Liely nobody watches KO!!! Why would they right care what happended to him??? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
68. There was another scare the other day
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny Noshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
69. The more I watch KO on youtube
the more I think I should actually start watching the whole show. As for the Post: I don't buy it, don't even take one when they're given away, and wouldn't use it to line a bird cage because I might end up insulting the bird's intelligence.

"And most chillingly of all, this is the Law and Order and Terror government.
It promised protection against all threats: conventional, radiological, or biological.
It has just proved that it can't save its citizens from standing water."
-- Keith Olbermann
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
72. They're all a bunch of vandals.
They are right wing vandals. And as such, they love stealing elections, assassinating characters, destroying the years of hard earned civil rights, etc.

We build. They tear down.

Keith is a sophisticated man. Unlike the money grubbers who taunt him. Shame on them. I fear for this country if these people continue to vandalize us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #72
74. The correct word, imho, is "brownshirt".
And you're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
73. but... but... but... THAT'S NOT "REAL" TERRORISM!
THIS is!:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
75. Way to hit back Keith
at the bunch of hypocritical bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
77. Somebody at the NYP needs a massage...
...with a Garden Weasel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intaglio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
78. k & r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
79. I wonder if it would be possible for Olberman to sue Murdoch or
one of his minions responsible for defamation (heavy punitive damages). Or for the FBI to do so on some ground or other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #79
81. Probably not defamation, but he may be able to sue for something else
By joking about him receiving death threats and revealing information that impedes a terrorism investigation there could be potential lawsuits on two fronts. By joking about death threats they could potentially be putting Keith Olbermann's life in danger and they would be encouraging more threats against him. If you got a death threat and a major publication were to joke about it I am positive you could sue, being Keith Olbermann is a public figure it is a bit more of an uphill battle although I am sure he could bring a strong case forward and very likely win.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #81
97. Yes. Bush's crowd have been getting hysterical about a film
Edited on Fri Sep-29-06 05:40 PM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
based on the theme of Bush being assassinated. Which I thought was typically cowardly.

All those Democratic giants assassinated (Roosevelt's murder apparently only thwarted thanks to the honourable soldier, General Smedley-Butler), that other giant among progressives in the eyes of the world, Martin Luther King, and so many others. And they've been screaming about this film! Not to speak of the constant stream of "jokes" and actual threats receivied by Bush's rare critics in the media.

Didn't Michelle Malkin make some such remark? And Olbermann, as you mentioned, received a suspicious parcel the FBi considered might have been anthrax? And the previous REAL anthrax sent through the post... they sourced it to a government laboratory and I don't believe the people were even interrogated. Certainly, nothing came of the investigation, nor any excuse given.

Anyway, You probably couldn't FIND an assassin who was a Democrat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
80. Keith savages the repuke LIARS once again. Thank you, KO & MSNBC!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
84. I hope they catch the fuckers that sent that to KO....
...and they rot in hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwar Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
85. Ann Coulter
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 08:18 PM by mwar
I'm surprised Ann Coulter didn't take responsibility for this. Remember a couple of months ago she "jokingly" took credit for a fake anthrax letter sent to the New York Times? I wouldn't put it past that freak of nature to do something like this for publicity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VeggieTart Donating Member (698 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #85
94. And we know how much Coultergeist loves...
...to make death threats against people she doesn't like. Olbermann has mentioned four. I remember Hugo Chavez and Lincoln Chafee, but there are others, aren't there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
89. Wonder how the writer would have acted if it was in HIS mailbox
my guess is he would have been more than a little "spooked" himself. What a fucking scumbag - he and his boss. Anthrax, or the threat of anthrax, isn't a real funny thing, as a few people could probably tell him from experience.

Keith Olbermann is obviously a man of tremendous courage, and integrity. He is also obviously aware of what this administration is capable of. I wouldn't have blamed him if he HAD acted like the scumbag writer said he acted, but I believe him when he says he didn't.

Really, the writer is making fun of both Keith AND anyone who may be, or has been threatened in this way. It's NOT a funny little prank - people HAVE died. The article disgusts me - there is nothing fucking funny about the threat of anthrax. Keith's comments also make me wonder who else is getting these little "jokes", if anyone.

It's a sad, sad state of affairs when one has to worry about anyone who speaks truth to power to this administration, but I do worry. I worry about Keith, I worry about Stewart and Colbert, I worry about the people who write the books I read.....and it's just not funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porkrind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
92. terrorists strike on Chimpy's watch
SNIP: ... host Keith Olbermann received a suspicious letter filled with white powder ...

Looks like the terrorists have struck on Chimpy's watch. So much for preventing another terrorist attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
93. Rupert Murdock is simply despicable.....no debate!
I can only shake my head in disbelief at this unbelievable piece of "news"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
98. NYPost helpin terrorists
now thats a headline
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC