Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate hearings on S3950 (Specter-Leahy Amend) -- THREAD 2

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:42 AM
Original message
Senate hearings on S3950 (Specter-Leahy Amend) -- THREAD 2
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 10:49 AM by CornField
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. ARLEN - don't fail us now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. He's doing a good job - I just hope it's not all show.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. He's fiercely defending the turf of Senate Judiciary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. it is his amendment (preserve Habeus)-so he will not cave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sen. Specter still up -- "Sec. Defense should not decide what the...
"Sec. of Defense should not decide what the Constitutional standards are."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. thanks for the new thread cornfield. (this is the Specter-Leahy amendmen
that they are talking about)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. All time for debate on the amendment has expired.
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 10:48 AM by MrCoffee
They're in leadership time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. All Time Is Expired -- last call for debate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. a few last words coming yet.---before vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Who let Sen. Graham's crazy ass back on the floor
AND WHO IN THE HELL IS 'CHEERING' HIM ON THE FLOOR?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. Here comes the vote!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. eeek
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
12. Vote on Amendment happening now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
13. calling the roll. keep this kicked. few Senators seem to be ready
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nictuku Donating Member (907 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. Can you hear the votes? I'm not hearing much --- darn it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Every so often, the clerk is not repeating the votes...there went Snowe
and i didn't hear how she voted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
16. So if the amendment passes, do you think Dems will bother to filibuster?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. The Dems MUST FILIBUSTER!
If they don't, I am not sure we have a country named America any longer. The name may be the same, but what made it great is gone. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #16
35. Why is it BAD if this amenment passes?
It isn't the entire bill, it just restores the habeus corpus protections. I guess the down side is, it makes the bill more palatable for many, which would be wrong. So yes, I suppose a filibuster would be the next necessary step.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #35
43. It's a crap shoot
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 11:04 AM by CornField
If the bill passed without this amendment, it was nearly guaranteed to go to the courts where the entire mess would be tossed out as unConstitutional and kicked back to Congress.

The flip side is that if this amendment passes, the House will have to come back (at a time when many want to be home campaigning)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #43
115. Very good asessment, CornField.
The ammendment just failed, and I can't say I'm disappointed. Now this will be stricken down by the SCOTUS on account of the unconstitutionality of HC suspension. This will probably occur after Democrats have regained a majority in at least one house of Congress - too late for the GOP to try agian to give the Bush junta the 'get out of jail free' cards they desperately desire. Then we'll release the hounds!

If this ammendment had passed, the House would have reconvened to make the adjustments necessary to send it to Junior for his signature. The Decider wants this pretty bad.

And, there are three more ammendments being considered after this one. Passage of any one would require the House to reconvene, as you described in your second scenario. It's not likely that any of them will, however, just because they are all authored by Democrats.

Check it out, two of these ammendments are being submitted by my 2 WV Senators. Go, Jay & Bobby!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
17. K & R - 5th vote - off the Greatest Page!
This is scary...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. Feingold voted for the amendment
Good grief. I thought he would reject the entire bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:56 AM
Original message
The amendment is to restore habeas corpus. He had to vote for it
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 10:57 AM by Mass
It does not mean he will support the bill.

He is a co-sponsor of the amendment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
29. THanks for that n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
22. What was that, maybe 15 votes total???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Still going - this is on Specter's amendment.
Seems a bit chaotic there, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Lieberman voted yes for the amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
23. clinton, wyden says YEA, lots of repug say no including Warner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. Lieberman "aye" - for what it's worth. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #23
30. Leiberman and Durban say YEA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. Murry, yea, Inohug NO ----------Allen NO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
25. Did Sununu just vote for the amendment?
My,my,my...if true, that's an interesting development
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. yes he did
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
31. This may pass!
Smith & Sunnunu votes aye. PLEASE keep this up, have to leave computer soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. I worry that if it passes, Dems won't filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
32. GO PATTY!!! WOO HOO!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #32
49. AND MARIA TOO!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
36. Reid's office taking all calls. They are being flooded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArmchairMeme Donating Member (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
37. C-Span
I have been watching this on the internet as C-Span on tv is strangely unavailable today - no message - just black. This is unusual as this is where I usually watch Senate sessions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #37
58. I am here wondering why
thi sis not on MSM live for everyone to see what their Senate thinks about their rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
38. is this the Specter amendment vote??
Just turned it on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:59 AM
Original message
yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. Yes! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
39. Question??
If they preserve HC isn't there other things tremendously wrong with this bill. Also couldn't a signing statement alter what the ammendment actually seeks to protect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. Yes and Maybe.
There are plenty of other things tremendously wrong with this bill. and whether a signing statement could alter anything hasn't been decided yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. Chafee voted yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #42
51. Good for him. I still hope he gets creamed in November.
No decent human being should call him/herself a Republican anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #39
53. If the amendment passes, it is doubtful they can get it passed before
they go out on recess. They don't have time to get together with the house and compromise and re-vote before the adjournment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
44. Mike DeWine voted no...get to work OH DUer's!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
45. Mc Cain"no"
jerk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
46. McCain you scum!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. I do not understand his vote AT ALL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #47
52. You know what it means?
It means his intial outrage and resistance was an ACT. He could care less. Asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #52
57. it's not his resistance, it's that he was tortured himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:07 AM
Original message
I know that - but he obviously doesn't have a conscience.
No other explanation; why on earth would he deny a detainee the right to a trial? They are all assuming detainees are already guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
71. I just don't get it...i mean i cannot comprehend it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #71
89. Me neither.
Other than money and power are ultimately more important than anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #57
75. Doesn't mean he wouldn't want to torture OTHERS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
48. McCain votes no...
Well, that seals the deal on how genuine the Republican opposition to torture was...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohinoaklawnillinois Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
50. McCain voted No.
:banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #50
55. What's the score now? Anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tex-wyo-dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #50
60. McCain is all an act...
he's been promised the WH if he complies with the fascists...he's sold his soul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #60
63. Funny thing is, they will NEVER let him have the WH either
so he sold his soul for NOTHING. And he does not even know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tex-wyo-dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #63
66. True that n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #63
81. Cf. "Richard" in "A Man for All Seasons"~~~"But for WALES??"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
54. do we just have 2 republicans, where are the women from maine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #54
78. Well, Specter voted for it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
56. votes
Nelson, Schumer, Biden - AYE
Kerry, Rockefeller, Feinstein - AYE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
59. Did Landrieu and the 2 Nelsons already vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #59
61. Landrieu jumped the shark yesterday, so expect her to do the same today
she has become a tool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #59
62. Florida Nelson "aye", Nebraska Nelson "no" n/t
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 11:13 AM by sparosnare
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ralps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #62
72. Nelson of Nebraska- No!!
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:13 AM
Original message
Crap - I'll edit. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #59
90. Landrieu NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #90
95. I heard Landrieu Aye...
Did she change her vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunnystarr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #95
123. Landreu did vote YES ... but where is Byrd?
I didn't hear a vote from Byrd and the final was 48-51 so must be he didn't vote. If he had voted and Nelson Nebraska voted like a Dem the vote would have been 50-50!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
64. Grassley -- No -- that f-in' figures
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
65. Coleman's office won't say how he is voting
Guess that means he is voting against Specter's amendment.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohinoaklawnillinois Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #65
73. Count on it. Coleman's a sleaze...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alizaryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
67. I have officially lost count
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
68. I like how they can sit there and socialize...
not realizing that they are crumbling this great country to pieces... :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #68
77. Exactly..."after we vote to torture people and remove the right of Habeus
Corpus, wanna go grab a burger down the street? Some of the others are joinging us, we can have some drinks and celebrate"

Bleh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #77
97. they're talking about hitting the fundraising trail tomorrow.
All these assholes care about is money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
69. Has ANY Democrat voted against the amendment?
:shrug:

How many Republican defections so far?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #69
80. Nelson (Nebraska) voted No. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:14 AM
Original message
Nelson of Nebraska votes no...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
70. Collins "no" its over
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #70
74. Grrrrrrrr...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #70
76. The last day of America was a beautiful one ;_;
At least the sun was shining as the country came to an end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #76
82. It is rainy and effing cold here
our country was just destroyed by less than 200 people...amazing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:15 AM
Original message
I'm sorry -- here in Washington it's sunny
but I'd rather have lousy weather than lousy leaders any day
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
92. Murray and Cantwell voted yes.
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 11:17 AM by MrCoffee
sorry, thought you meant WA state, not the district. my bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
93. That's OK, you will have our weather tomorrow
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #70
85. I`m sick.
Thought she might come to her senses and go over to the bright side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wiley50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
79. Man, This vote is clearly showing true colors n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
83. Landrieu voted aye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #83
88. I am quite frankly shocked
and will extend an apology...this one time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
84. Landrieu voted yes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #84
86. Aye!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #86
94. Kat, I thought I heard NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #94
98. I rescind my apology upthread until I can confirm Landrieu's vote
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 11:18 AM by mtnester
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #98
108. Kat is probably right. She can hear better than me. Sorry
for the confussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #94
100. Nope. I heard aye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #84
91. No she didn't, unless I'm hearing things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #91
96. I think she voted Aye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #96
104. Ammendment fails, sorry getting old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #91
102. Well, it failed.
Bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
87. Harkin - Yes -- Iowa just nullified itself again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #87
99. Iowa's bipolar? lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohinoaklawnillinois Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #87
101. Doesn't that happen all the time?? I mean come on, there
can't be two more polar opposites than Tom Harkin and Grassley. I sometimes wonder if Iowa isn't a bi-polar state. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
103. THREAD 3 ---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
105. FUCK, IT FAILS 48-51????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ralps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
106. Grrr Yays 48 Nays 51
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArmchairMeme Donating Member (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
107. Amendment Fails!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
109. It failed 48-51. McCain could have made it 49-50. Who else was a
big disappointment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #109
111. drats. so so so SO close. damm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #109
113. NELSON - NEBRASKA
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
110. they want the chamber brought to ORDER KERRY UP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #110
112. this board is slow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #110
114. oops Rockerfeller is first
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
116. Jay - complaining about GOP rushing this legislation through
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 11:38 AM by Lasher
Says Democrats were not given time to review it.

Kerry speaking now. Would this bill squander our moral authority? Does it make clear we support the Geneva Convention? Does it make clear the US does not engage in torture? The answer is no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
117. Kerry. Please get visibly angry. PLEASE.
We need some OUTRAGE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
118. Kerry is up now - talking about election year politics
Comparing this vote with the Irag war vote in 2002.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
119. Kerry: The only gurantee we will have against torture is word of Dubya
We're supposed to trust him? Unconstitutional suspension of writs of HC. We are not in rebellion or being invaded, believes the SCOTUS will rule unconstitutional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
120. Kit Bond (R) just said this ammendment would hold up interogation
Heh heh, Jay just asked him how this could hold up ongoing interrogation since the CIA currently is holding no detainees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
121. THREAD 3 IS OPEN NOW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
122. Is it time for a new thread?
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 11:54 AM by Lasher
Well over 100 posts now.

Edit: Oops, already done. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC