Boehner Implies Dems Refused to Work with GOP on Torture/'Roo Court Bills

[BurtWorm]

http://mediamatters.org/items/rss/200609280008

In September 28 articles on the House's passage of a Republican bill governing the detention, interrogation, and prosecution of terrorism suspects, the Los Angeles Times and the Associated Press reported House Majority Leader John Boehner's (R-OH) suggestion that Democratic opponents of the measure were refusing to "work with Republicans to give the president the tools he needs to continue to stop terrorist attacks." But neither outlet noted that Democrats had offered 15 amendments to the bill -- all of which the Republican-led House Rules Committee barred from consideration on the House floor.

On September 27, the House passed the GOP-backed Military Commissions Act of 2006 by a vote of 253-168, with 34 Democrats voting in favor and seven Republicans voting against.

In the floor debate prior to the vote, Boehner expressed hope that his "Democrat friends" would "stand together" with Republicans on the bill:

BOEHNER: he question is, will my Democrat friends work with Republicans to preserve this crucial program or oppose giving the president the tools that he needs to protect the American people? Will my Democrat friends work with Republicans to give the president the tools he needs to continue to stop terrorist attacks before they happen, or will they vote to force him to fight the terrorists with one arm tied behind his back?

Now, I do not, and will never, question the integrity or the patriotism of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle. This is about giving our president the tools he needs to wage war against terrorists who are trying to kill us. And I hope that we will stand together this week and vote to give our president the tools that we need to fight and win in our war against terrorists all over the world.

But as Washington Post staff writer Dana Milbank reported in his September 28 "Washington Sketch" column, far from attempting to "work with" their fellow Democrats, the House Rules Committee -- chaired by Rep. David Dreier (R-CA) -- had on September 26 "ruled that the House would not consider some 15 amendments the Democrats had proposed to legislation on military commissions." Both the Post and New York Times articles on the passage of the bill also noted that Democrats had been "prevented from offering any amendments" -- including one "that would have extended the habeas corpus right to detainees."

[katsy]

1. "to wage war against terrorists who are trying to kill us"

I wish the terrorists would kill ONLY you.

Sorry for that. Vile little slug that he is. Well, nevermind.

[bullimiami]

2. I wont say anything because we dont live in a free country.

[BlueStater]

3. How will torture stop terrorists attacks?

Won't it have a completely opposite effect and antagonize the terrorists more?

Fuck that bastard Boner. He's a goddamn disgrace as a politician and as an American.

[sunwyn]

4. Beohner is a piece of dung

that reeks to high heaven. I have been fighting with him since the day he took office. Mr. Spray on Tan is a joke in my community....the district he represents.

[GeorgeGist]

5. And down and down they slide...

as they give another pass to those who lied.

Some might call it journalistic suicide.

But it's really homicide...

by proxy.

[w4rma]

6. Filibuster this crap. They are full of themselves because they don't think

Dems will filibuster it.

[Blackhatjack]

7. It is time Democrats Held A Press Conference on Steps of Congress...

If they do not counter outright lies like this, it will just reverberate throughout the MSM with the connotation that it is true.

Where are the DEMS on this?