Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Hearings S3930 (Kennedy/ Rockefeller/Byrd Amends) -- THREAD 6

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:56 PM
Original message
Senate Hearings S3930 (Kennedy/ Rockefeller/Byrd Amends) -- THREAD 6
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'll repeat
How can they deny a sundown?

The GOP IS INSANE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. me too then : cause they plan to stay in power forever
otherwise, it makes no sense at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. they have gone rabid. there is no cure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I just don't see how a Sunset Amendment changes anything...unless
there's some "loophole" that is getting Warner upset. Warner says this is going to be a VERY LONG WAR... Disgusting.

There must be something in the "Sunset" that allows that bill to be changed or why would Warner freak out. Of course, Repugs never give an inch so he could just be bloviating the "take no prisoners" line that they love.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. "Sunsetting" a bill just mandates an automatic review date by Congress
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 02:07 PM by CornField
That is, sunsetting forces the issue back to the table whether or not those in power at the time want to discuss it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
59. There is no statue of limitations to war crimes?
If this were to sunset, would they be held responsible to war crimes at a later date?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Warner yields the floor to Byrd -- who is now thanking Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Byrd given unlimited time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Byrd is back, thanking Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Did Warner vitiate the debate schedule?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Byrd asks to read for the THIRD time the text of the amendment
BOING
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. !!! Warner : "this war against the people we GENERICALLY call terrorists
what is that supposed to mean. More extrapolating to leftists and antiglobalists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. Where do I apply for certification as a CSPAN geek?
I've got practical experience that could be considered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. ask LSK I think
:-)

The appointment has a sunset clause though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
35. LOL, heh heh.
So I guess LSK is the Geek Pro Tempore, right?

Oooo, check it out the Lion of the Senate is back up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. Warner is dead wrong.
If the sunset goes into effect, it tells terrorists that if they don't get caught before the sunset date, they get off scot free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. If he's so worried about what the terrorists think of the sunset provision
why isn't he worried about what they'll think of the parts where we say waterboarding is OK?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. That's the thing: If I'm willing to strap a bomb to my chest, I doubt
I'll give a frog's ass about the U.S.'s torture policy if I'm caught. The truth is that this bill -- and the torture we currently employ -- don't matter one iota to "the terrorists." They are important because of OUR STANDING IN THE EYES OF THE OTHER LAW-ABIDING PEOPLE IN THE WORLD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. Protecting America means protecting her laws
it means not doing the horrible - especially in the worst of times...of eroding those laws.

by changing our laws government is saying to us...America only works in the best of time but when faced with a crisis, America resorts to the thinking of tyrants and that screams America doesn't really work

The nature of our laws are to protect the innocent by giving the suspected guilty full and complete due process....even when that means the guilty walk free...because we believe it is better for a guilty person to walk than it is for a single innocent person to ever hang



Warner is angering me greatly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddhamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. Bush is the world's bin Laden
Warner :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. Oh don't vote for sunset..
a snide challenge for impeachment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
19. The lie that Bush hasn't already shown he will break and abuse the law
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 02:12 PM by Solly Mack
being put forth by Warner in his argument against sunset is criminal

by saying "If this president...ever does that"

Bush already has...and we already know he will



----
Please don't take that for support of the sunset clause..for I don't support it

simply because I support NOTHING about this bill...nothing

this bill is wrong

and nothing mitigates that fact

pretending it's ok to pass the bill for 5 years and eradictae due process is still eradicating due process...and remember

power never yields anything willingly

once power gains and grows bigger...it's harder to take power back

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
22. Pubs have 80 mins left, Dems some 30
sucks bigtime - gonna get a lot of repubs now I fear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. Kennedy amendment : no abusive interrogation of AMERICANS captured
during the war.

he is trying to keep americans from being tortured. He must not have KBR stock (the US detention camp builders). Sends a fine message in and of itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
23. Question...Do the Dems still have time in debate on the bill itself?
i'm sure you know why i'm asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
24. Know why repukes are so opposed to this 5 year sunset clause?
If the law sunsets, wouldn't Junior's get-out-of-jail-free card also expire?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. According to Warner, it tells the terrorists that they have a...
"statute of limitations" wherein if they don't get caught before the sunset, they don't get prosecuted.

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Efilroft Sul Donating Member (827 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #27
54. Warner and company are worried more about hypotheticals than...
...what this nation is indeed becoming.

God help us win back Democratic majorities in both houses in November. And may We the People be so bold afterward as to hold our own Democrats responsible for passing pro-torture legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnfantTerrible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
25. Gee
You mean we'll only throw away the Bill Of Rights and turn overtly Fascist for 5 years instead of forever? Well... okay then. Sign me up!

What a fucking joke... 'cept it just aint the least bit funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. exactly!!
nothing about any of this is good or accecptable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
26. Text of Kennedy Amendment (from earlier in the threads)
On page 83, between lines 8 and 9, insert the following:

(2) PROTECTION OF UNITED STATES PERSONS.--The Secretary of State shall notify other parties to the Geneva Conventions that--

(A) the United States has historically interpreted the law of war and the Geneva Conventions, including in particular common Article 3, to prohibit a wide variety of cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment of members of the United States Armed Forces and United States persons;

(B) during and following previous armed conflicts, the United States Government has prosecuted persons for engaging in cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment, including the use of waterboarding techniques, stress positions, including prolonged standing, the use of extreme temperatures, beatings, sleep deprivation, and other similar acts;

(C) this Act and the amendments made by this Act preserve the capacity of the United States to prosecute nationals of enemy powers for engaging in acts against members of the United States Armed Forces and United States persons that have been prosecuted by the United States as war crimes in the past; and

(D) should any United States person be subjected to the following acts, without limitation, under circumstances in which the Geneva Conventions are applicable, the United States would consider such acts to constitute punishable offenses under common Article 3 and would act accordingly: forcing the person to be naked, perform sexual acts, or pose in a sexual manner; applying beatings, electric shocks, burns, or other forms of physical pain to the person; waterboarding the person; using dogs on the person; inducing hypothermia or heat injury in the person; conducting a mock execution of the person; and depriving the person of necessary food, water, or medical care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
29. Warner - Please don't hate us for rejecting Kennedy's amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
31. Kennedy back up -- Burden to state department?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. So... Kennedy has his own special tone in dealing with Warner. LOL!
He's basically bouncing his voice off the walls as he questions Warner's reading of his amendment which (in his words) "PROTECTS AMERICANS"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
32. Thansk CORNfield---i had to leave a while
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Dems agreed NOT to filly this bill:






Thu Sep-28-06 01:58 PM
Original message
Senate Nears Final Vote on Detainee Bill

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/28/washington/29detaincn...

WASHINGTON, Sept. 28 — The Senate today rejected an amendment to a bill creating a new system for interrogating and trying terror suspects that would have guaranteed such suspects access to the courts to challenge their imprisonment.

The vote was 51 to 48 against the amendment, which was offered by the Republican and Democratic leaders of the Judiciary Committee, Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania and Senator Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont. The action set the stage for final passage of the bill, which was approved on Wednesday by the House of Representatives.

The bill’s ultimate passage was assured on Wednesday when Democrats agreed to forgo a filibuster in return for consideration of the amendment. Any changes in the Senate bill, however, would have made it impossible for Republican leaders to meet their goal of sending the bill to the White House before adjourning on Friday to hit the campaign trail.

Underscoring the political stakes involved, White House spokesman Tony Snow said today that President Bush will emphasize Democratic opposition to the bill in campaign appearances.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. here-Snow said Bush will empasize Dem OPPOSITION on the stump!




...Underscoring the political stakes involved, White House spokesman Tony Snow said today that President Bush will emphasize Democratic opposition to the bill in campaign appearances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. They will do that whether dems stop it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. i will not believe it until i see it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #41
55. ditto that
there is fire in the Dems
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
importDavid Donating Member (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #33
42. Screw them.
Filibuster it.

Screw the deal.

Make them stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
34. whoa Teddy
my my
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. Whoaaa yessss!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
37. Kennedy is pissed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
39. Kennedy on FIRE : my amendment protects AMERICANS!
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 02:12 PM by BelgianMadCow
He is destroying them. Intellectually of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. lots of little people with little minds who want this bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
45. BITE ME WARNER
You put the word "shall" in the amendment...what an ass. Whiny damned baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
46. WTF?!?! Congress cannot direct the executive branch to fulfill a duty?
Is that what Warner is saying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #46
60. It's nuts
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 02:23 PM by Marie26
They do that ALL the time. That's what laws do! What's the real reason he's opposing this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
47. WARNER: THE SENATE MAKES THE LAWS
THE PRESIDENT ENFORCES THE LAWS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
48. Warner rebuttal attempt
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 02:16 PM by BelgianMadCow
Saying Kennedy, by ordering the State dept to inform other countries what the US thinks unacceptable is a breach of separation of power.

He has a logical point but it ir soooo low. If that's all he's got.

Now he wants to proceed to the vote. Chicken!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. I can't believe that's the only thing he could pull out of his ass
Congress has the right to set the law. By definition, the law is the rules/policies by which our nation is governed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
49. Yahs and Nahs on all remaining amendments??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Quorum, they are figuring out what to do
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 02:17 PM by LSK
I think Kennedy was just pissed and asked for votes early.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. Yeah Warner did a time trick again as well - did you catch it?
yesterday you said this is just a way to bide time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. He asked his remaining amendment debate time be move to the bill
The request was granted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #52
58. yes so this time does not count against any debate time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. yes -- should be interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
57. Did I just attend an african-american baptist church service?
That's what I feel like when I watch one of Kennedy's best speeches. Amen! Yes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
61. Do the Dems have any debate time left on the bill itself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
62. AAAGGHGHH! i just went totally deaf...thank you C-SPAN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. rather LOUD music playing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
63. I hate it when they start with the flutes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #63
66. They should be playing William Tell Overture for this interlude!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #63
70. i love flutes, but softly playing would be nice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #63
72. Saxby Chambliss, I am forgetting your name as I type
I commend the president...

nuff said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
64. While many a Duer listens to the interludium : what do y'all think so far?
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 02:26 PM by BelgianMadCow
For me, the dem amendments not only rock but are crafted in a manner of intelligent ways that if nothing else, make naysayers look really bad and provides ammo to counter the surefire "dem weak on natl security" spin theme.

Besides, they were on fire.

I don't know about a filibuster. The atmosphere is right, but can it still be done ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
67. back, discussing time remaining
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
68. Crap, Chambliss up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
69. Saxby rises in support of giving * a reacharound.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
71. Sen. Chambliss is dutifully wagging his tongue across Bush's butt now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #71
74. I cannot see his head, actually
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #74
83. Brings a whole new meaning to "old fart" doesn't it?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinksrival Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #71
90. Hi, I just got home from work. Trying to catch up.
I only have c-span 1. Are you all on c-span 2? All I see is congress trying to pass Gyno cancer month.

I e-mailed Durbin and Obama last night. Is it to late to do anything more?

Thanks Cornfield
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #90
95. c-span 2 is carrying the senate debate.
http://www.c-span.org/watch/cs_cspan2_wm.asp?Cat=TV&Code=CS2

there are several threads to call Dems and encourage the filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinksrival Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #95
103. Thanks MrCoffee
I'll call Obama. He is not as reliable as Durbin is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
73. How does the "changing nature of war" justify scrapping the constitution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #73
75. Chambliss "continue the program to ensure we continue to receive critical
info"

Hown many terrorist attacks have been avoided through the illegal rendition and torture again?
How many terrorists convicted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #75
84. WTF, "critical info" has been received?
LIARS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #73
77. Chambliss thinks we need to stoop to the enemy level..Beheading?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #73
78. blahblahblah
He really is commending the president alot, isn't he? And Mr. Saxby Chambliss is so knowledgeable about the nature of war - he's never served, of course, but he did attack Max Cleland, an war veteran amputee, for not being committed enough to national security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #73
79. Before we fought nation against nation
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 02:36 PM by CornField
so, if you tortured your enemies soldiers, it would no doubt be brought back to the UN or other international body for investigation. This "war on terror" is new. First, it is never-ending (much like the 'war on drugs'). Second, it isn't a war against another government entity, but against individual people who act in ways contrary to international laws. The difference is that when we torture these individuals, there is no oversight, except that which we place on ourselves. If we can delude the debate enough to remove torture restrictions in relation to our own laws/policies, our government will not be accountable to anyone -- not the other nations, not the UN, not NATO and, most importantly, not to the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
76. Saxby's argument - Don't make us do more work. We're tired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
80. Lindsey Graham gets 15 minutes...kill me now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #80
82. only if you reciprocate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #80
86. Come on, Graham
He was fighting this, once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
81. 15 mins of Graham
uh oh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
85. Repukes Want To Go Home!!
Words fail me but what I'm thinking CAN'T be put into words!!!

I'm turning off C-Span and THIS WHOLE sham taking place!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #85
89. They're trying to cover bush's ass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #89
93. this bill is so Blantantly Political-----yet the WH/repugs clap themselves
on the back as heros for saving americans. sickening
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
87. Graham is not making the slightest bit of sense.
The Geneva Conventions helped put pressure on the NVA to stop torturing John McCain, so let's ignore the Geneva Conventions??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
88. No, Lindsey, you got it right the first time... "unconstitutional"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:40 PM
Original message
Something's off with him
He's nervous, shifting feet, won't look up. He doesn't believe what he's saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
96. He's filming a tv commercial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
100. He rocks himself, like a baby
whenever he's doing something wrong. Drives me nuts, he did the same thing during the Clinton impeachment. Wish the squirt would just lay down in the fetal position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #88
94. ....
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 02:41 PM by Marie26
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
91. Does 'Lil Lindsey ALWAYS have to do that
'I'm such a soft, thoughtful, moderate' shtick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #91
92. "I'm Lindsey Graham, I'm your buddy, I'm your pal"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #92
101. I respect him for laying it out as he sees it. yet I STRONGLY Disagree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
97. The pukes are all about Somalia these days...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
98. Is Graham voting for Kennedy's ammendment?
He just said that telling people they will be war criminals if they torture our service men DETERS bad treatment, and even ENCOURAGES RELEASE of those already captured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
99. ~*~*~ THREAD 7 OPEN ~*~*~*~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Efilroft Sul Donating Member (827 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
102. Yo, Republicans and Vichy Dems:
Upholding the Geneva Conventions, due process, and Habeas Corpus during these times IS a sign of strong national security.

How dare the Republicans accuse real Democrats of being soft on terrorism when the Republicans are creating a terror state themselves? Ah, but they hate us for our freedoms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC