Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Hearings S3930 (Kennedy/Rockefeller/Byrd Amends) -- THREAD 7

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:44 PM
Original message
Senate Hearings S3930 (Kennedy/Rockefeller/Byrd Amends) -- THREAD 7
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 02:45 PM by CornField
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. CornField, you are the bomb!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. This is the last one I can do -- I've got to leave soon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. So are you noticing the new spin? We're "rendering" justice
not people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
38. Ah yes and those against this bill are infact, against justice.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes indeedie,
Thank you CornField
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. (from last post) Is Graham Voting For Kennedy's Ammendmnt?
He just made a very strong argument saying that by telling people they will be war criminals if they harm our soldiers DETERS bad treatment of our soldiers and even ENCOURAGES RELEASE of those already captured. Isn't the the crux of Kennedy's ammendment?

(I posted this in thread 6 but then it ended so reposted here)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think he's arguing that Kennedy's amendment is irrelevant/redundant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. oh ok
but they are still arguing Kennedy's ammendment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Graham: zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 02:48 PM by LSK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:49 PM
Original message
He's just blowing shit out of his mouth...it's unreal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. I cant even follow him
Im confused. What are we talking about again??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. but Lindsey--there is a retrospecive clause in the this bill that provides
for immunity for war crimes----UP the chain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
importDavid Donating Member (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. Graham....
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 02:50 PM by importDavid
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Good God... who needs NyQuil?

Five more minutes? AHHH!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. fuck, 5 more min for graham. lol n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. he's talking about some imaginary bill that he wrote in crayon last night
he's so far detatched from the reality of this bill that it's ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. lol he said we're still trying to figure out legal standards
after 5 years of war...as if our legal standards of the last TWOO HUNDRED + years havent worked just fine!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Oh My 200 Cases
have been brought by the detainees - CLOGGING the system...lol...where oh where will we ever find enough lawyers to handle these cases? 200 WOW!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southern_belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. How does Graham
sleep at night? He disgusts me. :rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. maybe he can bring Mrs Alito out to cry again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. ~
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
19. "The military is far more comptent to determine who is an enemy combatant
than the federal courts." - Graham

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:56 PM
Original message
Because that term doesn't exist!
Of course the courts don't know how to define it. It's like defining an "enemy of freedom". It's an empty label, w/o precedent, that Bush can use to label people & strip any rights or legal protection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Efilroft Sul Donating Member (827 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Yeah, but look who's the Commander-in-Chief.
Get back to me about that competency thing, willya, Lindsey?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
20. Best news of the day - Graham's time is up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. more self-congratulations from warmer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
21. They never get tired of patting each other on the back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
22. did Graham just call this Act a product?
"We need to somehow make this product better" - was what he said in closing after he clapped his dainty hands. Did he say product? Did he realize it after he said it like I think he did?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #22
33. Not sure but he DID say that since other countries don't have HabeasCorpus
we don't need it either.

I guess international law applies now :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
23. Sknnnnnnn...snort snort, smack
Umm, what was that? Graham must have stopped 'speaking' and woke me up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
24. Allow us to protect our asshats from prosecution in world court...wrong
I think they all know what is at the bottom of this bill...saving their own asses in the future, if war crimes are ever brought to the fore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Precisely. That's exactly what Warner and Graham
are arguing for..it's at the very heart of their arguments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
27. Here comes Cornyn...then the vote on the amendments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
31. Cornyn - It's "outlandish" to suggest this bill permits torture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. And no Democrat has time to reply?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. I think the Dems are out of time on the amendments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. Cornyn claims we didn't know we were at war until 9/11
Uh yes we did moron, didn't you see the Clinton interview? We you awake during the 90's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
32. Some Clarification Please
Is it just the Kennedy ammendment being debated now or what? They just said they are going to vote oin successionon 3 ammendments...the 3 listed in the title of this thread? What bill is Coryn debating on now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. After Cornyn, they'll vote on 3 amendments
Rockefeller - Requires CIA to give quarterly reports to Congress re: military tribunals/torture technique
Kennedy - Requires Condi to tell other countries that if they torture americans, they'll be treated as war criminals
Byrd - 5 year sunset provision on the bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. Thanks...it seems like
the repugs are arguing for these ammendments...or is it just me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. It also seems like...
they are arguing for a completely different bill that would be a mirror of the house bill that passed yesterday. Have they voted on such bill yet? If not, when?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. They're arguing for the bill without the amendments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. gotcha...thx....n/t
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 03:06 PM by Scoot420fla
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. I don't know how they're going to do it.
Kennedy's first maybe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
35. The republican Sssssnaketongue Cooryn's doublespeak :
we are not allowing torture, but making sure tha we comply with our international obligations.

When interpreting them, you only have to make everything opposite and you get the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #35
44. We are not torturing!
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 03:05 PM by Marie26
Just using "aggressive measures". :eyes: Yet then says the brave interrogators are at risk of conviction for war crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
41. oh-----Cornballs from TX--saying he is going to correct 'outlandish'
claims made by dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
42. I wish to thank the distinguished Senator from South Carolina...
For finally shutting up!! How in the world did he manage to fit about a year of drivel into his 15 minutes of alloted time?

He could have better spent that time attending a course on Bonehead Constitution 010, where they teach you that you cannot simultaneously participate in both the Legislative and Judicial branches of government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
45. Aggressive interrogation techniques retained by the compromise...
do substantially aid our intelligence, those methods have proven successful...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #45
52. he cites 86 Al Quaeda names given up during torture
of which half are arrested now. Isq this verifiable & verified??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
46. Cornyn - "We're not torturing people. We're using legal, agressive
interrogation techniques consistent with the Constitution, US and international law."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. They're eeevvviiillll
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 03:06 PM by Marie26
Do you understand how evil? Coryn will go on at length about it. Because if you get mad enough, maybe you'll stop thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
51. The dems just want the bad people to go away
STFU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
53. Some say this is all about Iraq...no, it is not about Iraq...what about
the foiled plot at Heathrow?

We have been successful, thank goodness, in preventing another terra attack on our own soil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. oh yeah, the made up plot based on bad info derived by torture,
how could i forget?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #57
65. Got toothpaste? LOL!
Not sure about international flight, but the carry-on restrictions have already been generally lifted in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
54. GO TEDDY!!! KICK ASS! TAKE NO PRISONERS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
55. Ted Kennedy getting fired up!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #55
58. His hands are shaking he's so fired up
GO TEDDY! Just dont keel over on us! lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #55
60. it takes him all of 4 seconds to get riled up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
56. I like the way Kennedy always adds "execution" when he talks about
being prosecuted for war crimes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #56
61. LOL LOL
Calling them on the "shall" excuse - 10+ laws instructing State Dept. it "shall" do something. Go Kennedy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
59. Kennedy is holding up the army manual
I am sure the army istelf would NOT participate in general in such torture.
They have to use private contractors or some such to gve the orders.

In the end, it will come down on whose side the army choses. I have confidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #59
62. He is painting his amandment as very very patriot
will provide for excellent ammo for blasting the naysayers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #62
77. Right, once the thugs throw at his amendment, the thrust of filibuster
has been rightly set with his good argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #59
63. I don't think the Army is fully aware of what all is going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #63
66. Here comes the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #66
70. Wait...did they call for the yeas and nays on all amendments and the bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #70
73. That's what I thought I heard too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #66
81. I gurantee all three amendments will fail
Repukes make sure all legislation will fail, no matter what, if it is introduced by a Democrat. I can't wait to hear all the repuke squeals and moans when they get the same treatment when we are the majority party.

But don't dispair, fellow CSPAN geeks. This POS will certainly be ruled unconstitutional by even this right-wing SCOTUS. By that time we'll be in control of the House or Senate, or both. And with no get-out-of-jail-free card for The Decider. Where to start...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #81
89. C-SPAN geeks??? I only watch for the music, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #81
106. By then, you or I could be dissapeared! I am not comforted by the
fact that it will be in the hands of SCOTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #63
67. Agreed. I think the majority take their oath and the classes on
geneva seriously. After all, it's also their butt on the line. Gives you perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
64. The dems are battling so damn hard
:cry:

We need to take control of Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
importDavid Donating Member (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
68. Drum roll please....
(crossing fingers)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
69. Oh geeze, Cornyn
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 03:16 PM by blogslut
my psycho Senator.

He doesn't like that we're calling it a torture bill. Blow me, Cornyn. You sucked. Remember when you gave Tom Coleman the "Lawman of the Year" award?

How'd that work out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
71. WTF...they're voting on all the amendments and the bill???
Does Rockefeller's 2 minutes go to the bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #71
72. Yep they are.
Rockefeller?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #72
75. He was asking about his time right before the quorum call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #71
74. i think...
they are voting on the bill first then the amendments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #74
76. they vote on amendments first then the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #76
79. yup youre right n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #76
80. Rockefeller first, Byrd second, Kennedy third.
With 4 minutes equally divided before each vote.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
78. We're getting 12 min of Leahy! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #78
82. and he's pissed about the timing!!
There is going to be 10 min of debate and a vote on the border fence bill in between
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
83. Leahy...he thinks it's a farce, a farce in the Senate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #83
85. this makes me think a filibuster is coming
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #85
87. I'm totally lost...is there time for debate on the bill left?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #87
90. yes, we are still on amendments i think
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #85
88. yeah right...
that would imply there are enough dems with spines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #85
107. There sure as hell better be!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #83
86. well, he's right. and he's PISSED
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spuddonna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
84. Sen. Leahy, you rock... It is a farce... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #84
92. Just got off the phone with Reids office (NV)
Staffer said it was too late to filibuster. Anybody know if this is true? I thought you could filibuster down to the wire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #92
94. The way my limited understanding says it goes is, a No vote on cloture
needing 41 votes constitutes a filibuster.
But I don't know if a vote on cloture is always held. LSK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #94
96. they need 60 Yes votes on Cloture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #92
95. there is time
The question is will they do it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #95
97. They wouldn't have
to filibuster long, right? Congress leaves session tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #97
99. if it doesnt pass cloture, it usually goes away
At least thats what happened with the ANWR bill last winter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #97
104. I asked the Reid Staffer
If the debate didn't end today or tomorrow would that be more or less the same thing? He said he was certain it would come to vote today and assured me Reid would vote against it. I'm calling Boxer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #95
98. The cloture vote after the amendments and before the vote on the bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #98
100. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spuddonna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #95
101. Just called the DC switchboard & told a Reid staffer "Filibuster!"
So if anyone wants to call while the votes are being tallied:

Call DC switchboard, 1-800-828-0498, and ask for Sen Reid's office... Press 1 to talk to a person! :)

We can try...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
91. Voting on the Rockefeller amendment now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
93. Vote on Rockefeller Amendment now - new thread time?
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 03:27 PM by LSK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #93
102. PLEASE!!!!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #93
103. do it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
105. NEW THREAD HERE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC