Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Hearings S3930 (Kennedy/Rockefeller/Byrd Amends) -- THREAD 8

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:34 PM
Original message
Senate Hearings S3930 (Kennedy/Rockefeller/Byrd Amends) -- THREAD 8
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 03:41 PM by LSK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spuddonna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks much! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Any aisle-crossers on the Rockefeller amendment?
Haven't heard any, although I came in part-way

Is there a woodpecker? I can hear incessant tapping
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Jeffords is a LOUD voter, lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinksrival Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Can you imagine what it will be like watching c-span......
if Dems have control?!! I so want to put these republipigs in their place!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Are thet still voting on amendments? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
54. Thanks all n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. voting on the Rockefeller amendment now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Nelson-FL Aye on Rockafeller
He scares me sometimes, never know how he's gonna vote. Only reason he's getting my vote this Nov is to keep Harris out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
importDavid Donating Member (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. anyone keeping count?
C'mon!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. i do not have a running total. sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Only the link back to thread 7 works for me, others are "not found"
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. check the greatest page..they all had at least 5 recs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. May be good to repost the gist of Rockefeller's amendment (I don't know)
as they are voting on it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
importDavid Donating Member (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. from previous thread...
Rockefeller - Requires CIA to give quarterly reports to Congress re: military tribunals/torture technique
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. work now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. yep! thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. Link to the text of all the amendments here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
20. Split in FL - Nelson Aye, Martinez No on Rockafeller
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
21. Why don't they just walk out?
The Dems need to UNANIMOUSLY WALK and proclaim with ONE, LOUD VOICE that they will not be part of this charade. The SCOTUS has already issued that this is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and therefore makes this bill illegitimate. Would this be a good idea?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spuddonna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. I was kinda hopin' Leahy would there...
When he yelled 'this is a farce'...

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. I thought so too & gave it a go in this thread
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 03:46 PM by BelgianMadCow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
importDavid Donating Member (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. it's not over until it's over...
waiting for this is "torture" ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #24
53. All of a sudden the rec's for that thread are set to 0
I'm not amused. It was an honest suggestion.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Coz the Repukes would just pass it without them
It's not like they give a damn about Senate rules, and they know it's only political junkies like us watching
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. Walking out is a bad idea...do you really want the visual of a bunch of
cut and run democrats running from the Senate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spuddonna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #28
40. Well I'd rather Leahy go over and start screaming in their faces...
And then possibly clock someone... Graham would be good!

I have daydreams like this often when I watch CSPAN2 lately. They never come true... :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #40
84. ROTF! Me too! Shredding papers, whole "amendment" ripped in half...
and dumped on the floor at the front desk, too, except making confetti of the damn thing to fill the room would be more visually stimulating!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spuddonna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #84
100. Yeah, papers flying...
(sigh) :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
63. Honoring and protecting our CONSTITUTION isn't cutting and running.
It's doing the right thing. They are already trying to pass this off as a bi-partisan bill when it is CLEARLY not! Let the Repukes OWN this. All. The. Way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
80. I suggested the same thing but the dems should fight this one
out this is just too important. my senator chafee (R) voted yes. they have to kick ass, if not, we will have to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
23. Lieberman voted yes for the Rockefeller amendment...FWIW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:47 PM
Original message
I noticed that too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
32. Workin' hard to prove his anti-war cred. wanker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
61. Leiberman voted yes on Levin ammendment yesterday too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
27. Is it too late to call again? Phone in hand.
I'm dying to tell them that their loyalty is to the Constitution, not some BS coerced agreement with the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. keep calling. i am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Dialing..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jo March Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
31. Read in another thread that Dole voted No on Rockefeller
big shock there. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. yeah someone said she was on the fence
but I heard them call her for NO...I wasnt too shocked either lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jo March Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #33
99. Her office told me that she was "undecided"
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
34. I'm still predicting a filibuster on the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Hope your right
Not getting hopes up too much though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #34
42. They'd have to wait for all 3 amendments to be voted down
first, I think. Kennedy and Leahy look mad enough to start one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. that's what they're doing. sizing up the support.
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 03:53 PM by MrCoffee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #34
47. Dems agreed NOT to filly if they could put forth amendments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. If they let that stop them...they're more worthless than i thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #47
62. Really? Well then they will have to put forward about 50 amendments.
This must be stopped, one way or another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #34
57. I had to leave the computer for quite a while, and I don't have C-Span
Is the vote on the bill imminent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #57
64. here's the c-span 2 feed link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #64
71. Thanks.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
35. 53-46 Rockafeller Ammend Defeated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
36. 46-53 Rockefeller amendment FAILS nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
38. 46 -53 against on the Rockefeller amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ralps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
39. Yays 46 Nays 53 on Rockefeller amendment
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 03:52 PM by ralps
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
41. Rockefeller Amendment fails 46-53
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
43. You give them hell, Mr. Senator Robert Byrd!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
44. "Friends, Senators, lend me your ears!" - Byrd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #44
59. Warner - "No idea how long this war on terrorism will go on"
It may be years until some terra perpetrators are taken prisoner, so this "sunset" amendment does not adequately cover the intent of this bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
45. How many ammendments left to vote on? Just Byrd's? Or is Kennedy's
still floating?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. both
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. Byrd's then Kennedy's then the bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #45
50. Byrd first, then Kennedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #45
52. so Byrd and Kennedy still have debate time?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #52
58. nope, Byrd Amendment vote time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #52
60. thanks all for listening with me. I have ha had to fade in and out today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
55. Voting now on Byrd amendment nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
56. Voting on the Byrd (5 year sunset) amendment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #56
65. most of the amendments have been so so close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. I can not hear any of the votes can any of you hear?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #67
70. they're not voting, they're calling the roll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #70
73. voting I think, I heard ayes & nays
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #56
69. Just got off the phone with Boxer's DC office
Staffer said too late to filibuster (same as Reids staffer). I urged a no on cloture. She said she wasn't sure what Boxer would do to stop the bill but she would vote against it. I don't think a filibuster is coming. Very sad day for the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
68. LOL, the clerk isn't putting up with any crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #68
72. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #72
74. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
75. REC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #75
77. well, at least both NELSON's voted AYE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #77
81. Lieberman and Clinton AYE, Kohl, AYE, Boxer AYE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #81
82. Feingold AYE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #82
83. Colman NO NO NO NO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #83
85. Coleman is a son of a bitch!
Former Democrat my ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #75
78. rodeodance, can you start the next thread?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
76. so far 37 Ayes n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #76
79. I thought they were just voting now??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoot420fla Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #79
87. I think that was a preliminary count
He read of the list of Ayes and Nays, then started calling the roll again...so Im guessing that was a preliminary count
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #76
86. We would have enough for a fillibuster! Damn them all if they don't!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #86
88. We'll see.
I really think that they might just do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #88
98. They have more than enough for a filibuster
Double damn them if they don't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
89. Specter voted AYE!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #89
91. McCain no.
Sellout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #89
93. I posted earlier that he was against this, and was shot down!
Everyone, without exception, said Arlen was an empty suit just speechifying until he could vote in Bush's favor. I have no love for Specter, but I do have a bit more respect for him now. He said his concern was for the rule of law, and it appears he is holding true to his words. At least for now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
90. thread # HERE NEW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #90
94. that brings a new post rodeodance, not a new thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nictuku Donating Member (907 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #90
95. Link doesn't work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #90
96. link takes me to posting page, try this link
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 04:11 PM by uppityperson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
92. can someone start thread 9 please
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
97. THREAD 9 IS UP NOW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC