Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

so, I'm now pro torture for defending Reid, who voted against the bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:49 PM
Original message
so, I'm now pro torture for defending Reid, who voted against the bill
I almost never make a post like this, but, this is the absolute worst I've experienced here. I've advocated for years against the type of suppression that this bill demonstrates. I've railed here for months against these detentions and the justifications used to hold them there I've advocated against this bill.

It's completely out of hand, and wrong to start feeding on those of us who already DISAGREE with the bill, just because we DARE to defend OUR party. Folks who make these kind of attacks on loyal party members don't deserve anyone's support.

I want to make it clear to any who will read this that I will never be intimidated away from support of my party; not by the opposition, nor by those within our party who take a different course or adopt a different opinion than I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Anakin Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. I Don't Think This Issue Should Divide Us.
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 08:14 PM by Anakin Skywalker
It's exactly what the rightwing wants. With Dems divided, they will win the election again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Reid voted against the bill but failed to lead his caucus
to block the bill's passage. For that he is a failure and should resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. he lead, his 'caucus' didn't follow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well that is the point, isn't it?
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 07:54 PM by Warren Stupidity
As the leader of the supposed opposition party he is completely ineffective and has been for the last two years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. that's crap, at least on this issue
the control that you want from him doesn't exist anymore, maybe shouldn't. That type of top down dominance did a great deal of damage in blocking grass roots efforts on other meaningful legislation and initiatives.

The votes have to come from the individual members. He was short. It has happened over the years to the best of leaders in that body. Just imagining that control and wishing it were so doesn't mean that option actually existed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theanarch Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. disagree:
on matters of seminal importance, indeed, issues that (supposedly) define the differences between the major Parties, partisan discipline is of utmost importance. Reid had the discipline on a series of amendments/alternatives to the bill that passed--even Ben Nelson voted with his Party on some of them, along with one (Chafee) or two (Sununu) Republicans. There is absolutely no excuse for Democrats to NOT have filibustered, or engaged in whatever parlimentary guerilla warfare was necessary to, at the very least, kill the bill for this term. Instead, when their opposition mattered most, a dirty dozen Democrats defected to the dark side, effectively euthanizing the concept and practice of habeus corpus in this country. I can guarantee that those cowards who voted for the WH plan with their elections in mind have lost more votes from their base than they'll ever gain elsewhere from the electorate...and with it, the DNC can kiss its wet dream of recapturing the Senate...and the House...good-bye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hey, at least you're not a tramp like I am for suggesting somebody
calm down. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thank you for this post. I agree absolutely!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. You're not wrong
Thanks for the post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. My friend, never change who you are - if people here haven't bothered to
get to know your heart and your head after all this time, then why bother with them?

No one who KNOWS your work and your efforts for all these years could possibly challenge your integrity.

Now - Let's go get those Bush bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC