Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge received death threats after ruling on intelligent design

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:40 PM
Original message
Judge received death threats after ruling on intelligent design
LAWRENCE, Kan. - A judge who struck down a Dover, Penn., school board's decision to teach intelligent design in public schools said he was stunned by the reaction, which included death threats and a week of protection from federal marshals.

Pennsylvania U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III told an audience in Lawrence Tuesday that the case illustrated why judges must issue rulings free of political whims or hopes of receiving a favor.

In a 139-page decision last year, Jones ruled that the Dover school board intended to promote religion when it instituted a policy requiring students to hear a statement about intelligent design before ninth-grade biology lessons on evolution. He ruled that it is unconstitutional to teach intelligent design as an alternative to evolution.

"And if you would have told me when I got on the bench four years ago that I would have death threats in a case like this as opposed to, for example, a crack cocaine case where I mete out a heavy sentence, I would have told you that you were crazy," he said. "But I did. And that's a sad statement."

http://www.rawstory.com/showoutarticle.php?src=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kansas.com%2Fmld%2Fkansas%2Fnews%2Fstate%2F15621028.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yea....and * has made it okay to make threats against judges.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Judges, the new abortion doctors. Well, the new targets of
Crazy People wrath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh please
Surely you don't mean "the radical Christians" that Rosie O'Donnell spoke of and was soundly trounced by the RW punditry?
Say it isn't so? I know because I heard it on the TeeVee. They are just harmless folk. Well cepting for blowing up abortion clinics and all, they are harmless. Cepting for blowing up Federal buildings in Oklahoma and all, they are harmless. Cepting for planting bombs at the Olympics in Atlanta, they are harmless. Cepting for threatening Michael Schiavo's entire family--including his small children and all, they are harmless.
The list could go on and on, cepting I am going to stop so I can :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. well it really is his own fault...
he shouldn't be such an activist.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeNearMcChord Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. So when do we start seeing radical fundie Christians
declared enemy combatants? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC