Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court Challenge to New Detainee Law May Come In "Days" (TPM)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 02:11 PM
Original message
Court Challenge to New Detainee Law May Come In "Days" (TPM)
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/001637.php

Court Challenge to New Detainee Law May Come In "Days"

By Justin Rood - September 29, 2006, 1:02 PM
With President Bush poised to sign the White House-backed detainee treatment bill into law, groups are promising to challenge it in court "in days."

“I don’t think there’s a snowball’s chance in ‘H’ that this will be found constitutional,” Michael Ratner, president of the Center for Constitutional Rights, told Congressional Quarterly (sub. req.). CCR represents a number of Guantanamo prisoners.

Strangely, some senators who voted for the bill weren't convinced of its constitutionality. Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA), who voted for the bill even after his amendment to preserve certain rights for detainees was defeated, called the proposal "patently unconstitutional on its face," The Washington Post reported. When CQ asked Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), who negotiated with the White House to win minor concessions on the legislation, if the bill was constitutional, he responded "I think so."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Unless the courts are completly corrupt, this bill will be struck down.
McCain is a bastard!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Before the ink is dry..........
if not sooner! McCain.....thinking doesn't seem to be your strong suit anymore. It may be time for him to retire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thank goodness for CCR.
Edited on Fri Sep-29-06 02:18 PM by mmonk
Real patriots and vigilant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. THAT'S exactly what I wrote on another post where everyone was
pitching a fit about the 34 Dems voting for it! I think this was the PLAN all along for those Dems. They can tell their constituents that they voted to save "W" ass, but it was unconstitutional...sorry!!!!!

I think a move like this by the SCOTUS will be MORE damaging to the PUBS than any NO vote by the Dems ever could have been!!!! U see this as the Dems giving the Pubs enough rope.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. My opinion is there is
no excuse for an action against the constitution (and this certainly was).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. Dupe, already posted in LBN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. so they KNEW it's unconstitutional and voted for it anyway? how
on earth could we possibly have any respect for them after that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC