|
Edited on Fri Sep-29-06 06:39 PM by OrangeCountyDemocrat
It seems to me, that given the internet and it's role in history, assuming you expect it along with technology in general, to provide an accurate record of what transpired.
Given that, one thing I notice about records on the internet, you are most often remembered by THE LAST THING(S) SOMEONE DID. In other words, people chronicle history in terms of your last act, not necessarily what preceded it.
So the final Wikipedia entry for Budd Dwyer shows how he was indicted, and 24 hours away form being sentenced to prison and convicted for serious crimes while in office. So, he calls a press conference, and on live tv and in front of reporters, ends it all. When you look this guy up on the internet, there is not much about his overall tenure, but more about his career ending crimes, and most prevalent of all, his conclusion.
So, how will history remember Foley? Resigning his COVETED & PRIZED office of 12 years? Resigning his COVETED & PRIZED office DURING A CAMPAIGN he was widely expected to win in a blowout?
Or will that be the preface, the introduction to the novel about to follow on how he propositioned a 16 year old boy, in a story so ripe with trivia and suggestion as to make a romance novel writer cringe?
Make sure you remember the "good" things about Mr. Foley. Whatever decent qualities he has, Foley deserves to be remembered for those final acts which brought about his demise.
I hate when bad things happen to good people, don't you?
|