Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gonzales Cautions Judges on Interfering

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
tpsbmam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 06:40 PM
Original message
Gonzales Cautions Judges on Interfering
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/29/AR2006092900511_pf.html
or
http://snipurl.com/xmkn

<snip>

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, who is defending President
Bush's anti-terrorism tactics in multiple court battles, said Friday that
federal judges should not substitute their personal views for the
president's judgments in wartime.

He said the Constitution makes the president commander in chief and the
Supreme Court has long recognized the president's pre-eminent role in
foreign affairs. "The Constitution, by contrast, provides the courts with
relatively few tools to superintend military and foreign policy decisions,
especially during wartime," the attorney general told a conference on the
judiciary at Georgetown University Law Center.


"Judges must resist the temptation to supplement those tools based on their
own personal views about the wisdom of the policies under review," Gonzales
said.

<snip>
The administration contends that despite the statute's language, the
president has inherent authority from the Constitution to order such
eavesdropping without court permission. Justice lawyers also have argued
that the challenges to the NSA program should be thrown out of court because
trials would expose state secrets. Most of the judges' rulings and
proceedings have been stayed pending appeal.

Gonzales also said he thought more states should move away from having
judges stand in partisan elections to keep their seats. Gonzales himself as
a Texas Supreme Court justice "had to raise enough money to run print ads
and place television spots around the state in order to retain my seat."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dupe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ecumenist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who the F&CK does this piss assed idiot
Edited on Fri Sep-29-06 06:55 PM by Ecumenist
think he is? Why the f#ck are they allowed to make threats? The minute he's thrown in prison, he'd started slobbering and whining although he seems think that it's quite alright to treat other human beings with less respect than a rotted carcass of a turkey vulture. WAKE THE F#CK UP, AMERICA!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Justified anger on your part. Well-justified, indeed; we're doomed.
We've lost America.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. You know, it's funny...
when Ashcroft was appointed A.G., I thought we had scraped the very bottom of the barrel. Obviously, I was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ecumenist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. My Aunt has this saying
Edited on Fri Sep-29-06 06:57 PM by Ecumenist
about the mates her children choose, "They don't scrape the bottom of the barrel, oh no! They pick it up and scrape what's underneath!" I believe that this applies VERY well to the current slime infesting our government at the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Does he have some Anthrax and a book of stamps handy?
Edited on Fri Sep-29-06 06:48 PM by Kurovski
Is that his plan?

The lousy totalitarian mother fucker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. There are two problems with this rationel.
Edited on Fri Sep-29-06 06:53 PM by Vincardog
1 We are not at a state of WAR.
Congress declaires war. They have not done that.

2 The constitution See Section 9

<http://www.midnightbeach.com/jon/US-Constitution.htm#1.9:|The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.>


I do not believe that "rebellion or invasion" includes invasion of a foreign country that posed no threat to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. True, except...
this administration doesn't give a flying fuck about Congress or the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. That is why WE have to make them give a flying fuck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. circular reasoning
We need to get rid of this asshole too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WHEN CRABS ROAR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. Let me get this right
Bush calls for an unjust war, and then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusEarl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. AG Gonzales is giving attorneys a bad name!
This from the chief law enforcement officer in the country, amazing really amazing!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. unfreaking believable! Wonder if the Supremes are happy NOW.
They installed BushCo and this idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. STFU, Torquemada!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
14. The Judiciary is the only Branch left for checks and balances...
if any of those criminal bastards gives a rat's ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. He should be disbarred and tried, he's a disgrace n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave502d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. Let's hope Gonzales will be in jail someday. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MzNov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'm hoping Fat Tony will get really pissed and the Supremes
will once again put Jr. and his gang in their places. We can hope anyway. I wouldn't want to piss off the SCOTUS, right wingers or not.

:dem:

"Let's Landslide"

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zonkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
19. Thank God this man is not on the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC