Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Not to rain on the pedophile gloat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:08 PM
Original message
Not to rain on the pedophile gloat
We should take a moment to remember Congressman Gerry Studds (D-MA)

HIs cas was far worse.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerry_Studds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. please explain how that was worse
from that article, it seems that case wasn't as bad and the congressman went on to accomplish good things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Worse because...?
Because we presume Studds actually had sex with that page, and that Foley never progressed beyond hot chat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Was it, really? Diddling minors is always bad, no matter who does it.
But I don't recall that this guy made such a HUGH!1!! deal of being a super-moral family values kinda guy, unlike (now former) Congressman Foley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. He actually "did the act"...
as I recall the young man claimed it was consensual, but he was only 17 or 18?

One thing about Foley though, he was involved in legislation against pedophilia. I don't think Studds ever was, but I could be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Hey, you and everybody -- see post #6.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Yeah, there is something extra sick here...Its the Preist thing...
the one person who you should be able to trust, the head guy who takes care of exploited children. Its a double whammy, for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. He was 27 in '83
It happened in '73, the censure was 10 years later when the young man was 27. So he was old enough to stand up for himself if he felt he had been molested. It is possible for 17 year olds to have consentual relationships, although I don't think adults should ever put 17 year olds in the position of having to make that choice. Especially when there's power involved. In fact, these cases came out in reference to something else that was going on at the time, and I don't remember what just now. I'm not sure if we were trying to pass sexual harrassment legislation or what exactly, but it was something to that affect that brought this out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Niche Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. A pedophile WHO EVER it is - is sick. What's your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. Maybe the point is that we should smack ourselves in the head
Regularly. For general purposes. Whether we need it or not. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. I see you fail to mention Dan Crane
Which was a Republican and busted for the same thing at the same time as Studds. It's even mentioned in the page you linked: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Crane

So, on whose parade I am raining now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. That's true, good point....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. Oh dear, I think you just introduced a thunder cloud to the OP!
Very good point. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. Well that wouldn't have served Senor Perky's purpose now, would it?
Edited on Fri Sep-29-06 07:24 PM by Mayberry Machiavelli
I suspect you may not see Senor Perky back on this thread.

They'll be back again, when duty calls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. And I'll be here waiting.
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. What was the age of consent?
I know here in MA, it's 16 now...I don't know about anywhere else, especially D.C., the non-state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. His case was legal
How was it far worse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tpsbmam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. That was then and ancient history....
this is now. And I have zero doubt that the emails and IMs are just the tip of the iceberg -- Foley just hasn't gotten caught for the rest. You think pedophiles are happy to stop with just emails? I don't.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. We've got RW talk radio scum that brings Studds up all the time out here.
Edited on Fri Sep-29-06 07:21 PM by Lastlaughin08
and it's over 30 years later. One particular hatemonger on WXTK radio in Hyannis launches every chance he gets.

Now I want to hear these pious, righteous holier-than-thou RW hypocrite asswipes ride Foley into the ground for at least that long.

Wanna bet it won't happen? Because they think they're God's chosen few, that's why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Well, call them and bring up Dan Crane then. (See post #6)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. No point in that. It's like a three-hour infomercial for the RW.
They aren't interested in facts, at least not the ones that paint their party in a negative way. And their callers are just as brainwashed as they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. did you actually read the entry
the House read their censure of him, Studds turned his back and ignored them. Later, at a press conference with the former page standing beside him, the two stated that what had happened between them was nobody's business but their own.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
14. it's not pedophilia in either case if they were in their teen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
15. actually desiring a 16 year old
Edited on Fri Sep-29-06 07:24 PM by notmypresident
is not pedophilia

I know we all like to be glib about this and consider anyone under 18 to be a child and all.

But the fact is pedophilia is an unnatural sexual attraction to sexually immature people, that is, true children.

Wanting to be with an underage but still sexually mature person is against the law and the rules of our society but it is NOT pedophilia.

Of course, I expect to be condemned to hell and back for pointing this out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. SHAME!!!
social mores are made to be followed blindly in all situations, questioning them only gives power to the terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. Both are perverts
Both Foley and Studds are sick individuals, no question about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sleepless In NY Donating Member (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. The Worst? Phil Giordano(R) having sex with 8 &10 year old girls
Sorry but I don't think you can get any sicker than former Mayor Phil Giordano of the "Family Values" Republican Party:

Philip Giordano (1963-) is the former Republican mayor of Waterbury, Connecticut and a convicted sex offender.

While investigating municipal corruption, the FBI discovered phone records of Giordano arranging meetings with a prostitute named Guitana Jones, her 17 year old niece, and her daughters, aged 8 and 10.

He was arrested on July 26, 2001 and, in March 2003, was convicted of 14 counts of using an interstate device, his cell phone, to arrange sexual contact with children. He was also convicted of violating the girls' civil rights. He was sentenced to 37 years in prison
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Giordano

Then of course there is the other "moral" hypocrite Mayor Jim West(R):

James Elton West (March 28, 1951 – July 22, 2006), best known as Jim West, was the mayor of Spokane, Washington. He was recalled during a special election held on December 6, 2005. On December 16, the day the votes were certified, he was officially stripped of his duties as mayor.While in the legislature he served as Senate Majority Leader.

During these years, West supported many anti-gay bills, including one that would have banned gays and lesbians from working in schools and day care centers. He also proposed a law that would ban all sexual activity among persons under the age of of 18 .

West was involved in a sex scandal in 2005. He was accused of sexually abusing two young boys in the 1970s and 1980s when he was a sheriff's deputy and Boy Scout leader. He was also accused of misusing his office as mayor to lure teenage boys for sexual relationships. He admitted to having private online relationships in the past year http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_E._West_%28politician%29
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truthiness Inspector Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
25. Good post
No matter how fucked up this country might be, NO party is FOR pedophilia.

As I said in an earlier post, pedophiles are shunned by all humans. It's not a "political bean bag" to toss around. Kids are hurt everyday by perverts, many of whom have no political affiliation. They are SICK bastards who happen to be R, D, I, G, or whatever.

They should all be in prison.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
28. The page was 17 at the time,how is that far worse?
Plus more skeletons may emerge in Foley's case.



"As the House read their censure of him, Studds turned his back and ignored them. Later, at a press conference with the former page standing beside him, the two stated that what had happened between them was nobody's business but their own.

Studds was re-elected five more terms after the censure"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. I don't like what he did, but he was a great congressman for us.
That's why he was elected over and over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
30. The point is that these guys regardless of party are sick human
beings.

The point is that this is not simply a republican issue.

The point is Studds toook it further much further then this guy did.


The point is this is a sad thing to have happen and there but for the grace of God go many many people.

I can not rejoice in this tragedy and am slightly shocked at the amount og myopic glee

ANYBODY..REGARDLESS OF PARTY WHO IS A PEDOPHILE SHOULD BE SCORNED....
THOUGH I SUSPECT IF THOS HAD BEEN A DEMOCRAT MANY ON HERE WOULD BE SAYING IT WAS ENTRAPMENT.

IT IS JUST SICK AND VERY VERY SAD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
31. Republicans pretend to be God's gift to civilization
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC