Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Cole was bombed on October 12, 2000, Bush coddled the Taliban all 2001

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 08:40 PM
Original message
The Cole was bombed on October 12, 2000, Bush coddled the Taliban all 2001

Some are failing to draw a distinction between the aid Clinton provided to Afghanistan in 2000 against Bush's coddling of the Taliban (for the UNOCAL oil pipeline) in 2001.

There are serious problems with that conflation.

As mentioned in the title, the Cole was bombed on October 12, 2000, but blame was not certified to al qaeda, being sheltered by the Taliban, until December of 2000. That's all of 2000. Clinton was completely justified in providing aid to Afghanistan when he did. The point is that once the attack had been certified to al qaeda, in December of 2000, and attack plans drawn up to hit al qaeda in Afghanistan in order to break it up, Bush, in his zeal to completely overturn or reverse anything Clinton had done, turned to a policy of appeasement instead, with the disasterous result that in September of 2001, after Bush had made himself the world's largest supporter of the Taliban (certified by the Clinton Administration as sheltering al qaeda), and having sat on what now turns out to be Clinton's prescient attack plan to disrupt al qaeda to prevent further attacks, a wheat-stuffed and fully monetized al qaeda hit the United States (not that the August 6, 2001, presidential daily briefing entitled "Bin Laden determined to strike in US" hadn't made it even more crystal clear).

Bush sought a policy of appeasement with a rogue government certified as sheltering a terrorist enemy that had already attacked the U.S. by bombing the Cole.

Any aid Clinton had provided in 2000 is irrelevant, because this certification didn't take place until December. Bush was handed attack plans for Afghanistan and sat on them, throwing away the opportunity that Clinton would have acted upon to disrupt al qaeda and prevent the attacks on the United States. He was even warned in August that the attack was coming at home and still did nothing, after having made his administration the world's largest supporter of the Taliban in 2001.

See this link for earlier discussion:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x2235310

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GCP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Looks like you have 2000 where 2001 should be
At least, I'm hoping this is the case
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Nope. Bush knew al qaeda was in Afghanistan and gave them $43 million

He knew that Afghanistan was certified as having a rogue government sheltering terrorists who had attacked the United States, with a Clinton administration attack plan for Afghanistan in his hands, and he gave them money and wheat and aid instead, nurturing the little al qaedites so they could grow up and become suicide attackers on planes that according to Condi Rice no one could imagine and blow up Americans on American soil, just like it said in the August 2001 Presidential Daily Brief.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sorry, but criticizing Bush for giving food aid to starving people
is not a principled approach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Except it's not to "starving people" it's to the al qaeda who are there

It's to appease the Taliban after the Clinton administration put together a plan to disrupt al qaeda that would have stopped 9/11.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GCP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. nevermind
Edited on Fri Sep-29-06 09:18 PM by Godlesscommieprevert
my mistake
continue to charge!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I will indeed

Bush coddled the Taliban.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC